One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
US ranks last in election integrity. Why??
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Nov 12, 2022 10:36:54   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2020-10-07/us-elections-compare-poorly-to-other-democracies-research-shows

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 11:07:40   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2020-10-07/us-elections-compare-poorly-to-other-democracies-research-shows


Unfortunately not a shock.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 11:17:46   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
JFlorio wrote:
Unfortunately not a shock.


I know. It is very sad and is leading to our destruction. It certainly is eating away at our way of life.

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2022 11:22:58   #
pegw
 
US News and World report leans slightly left and has a high degree of reliability. Just remember that the Democrats had a bill in Congress to insure more reliable voting, and the Republicans blocked it.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 11:26:31   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
pegw wrote:
US News and World report leans slightly left and has a high degree of reliability. Just remember that the Democrats had a bill in Congress to insure more reliable voting, and the Republicans blocked it.


Such a dimwit. They want to federalize elections. The stupidity you show is amazing.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 11:32:16   #
American Vet
 
pegw wrote:
US News and World report leans slightly left and has a high degree of reliability. Just remember that the Democrats had a bill in Congress to insure more reliable voting, and the Republicans blocked it.


Weak-minded ELWNJ response - attack the source.

A democrat bill to 'insure more reliable voting'? Couldn't find it - need something more substantial than you.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 11:33:53   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
American Vet wrote:
Weak-minded ELWNJ response - attack the source.

A democrat bill to 'insure more reliable voting'? Couldn't find it - need something more substantial than you.


I wonder if these stupid progressives have ever had an original thought?

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2022 12:03:35   #
okie don
 
Hillary Good- sell uranium to Russia.
Orange man Bad -Friends with Russia want no wars..

Biden - Good Sell.reserve oil to China.
Biden - Good. Want nuclear war with Russia.

Democrats have screws loose somewhere and unable to add 2+2.
Maybe 3 rd grade educations?

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 12:37:00   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
American Vet wrote:
Weak-minded ELWNJ response - attack the source.

A democrat bill to 'insure more reliable voting'? Couldn't find it - need something more substantial than you.


It was their voting reform bill that would insure that only democrats ever got elected from then on.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 12:38:02   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
okie don wrote:
Hillary Good- sell uranium to Russia.
Orange man Bad -Friends with Russia want no wars..

Biden - Good Sell.reserve oil to China.
Biden - Good. Want nuclear war with Russia.

Democrats have screws loose somewhere and unable to add 2+2.
Maybe 3 rd grade educations?


The left (dems) - 2+2=4 is racist!!

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 13:11:54   #
Weswill
 
pegw wrote:
US News and World report leans slightly left and has a high degree of reliability. Just remember that the Democrats had a bill in Congress to insure more reliable voting, and the Republicans blocked it.


Election laws and how to run an election goes through the states' legislatures. Not Congress. So anything that Congress passes on election laws and procedures will be unconstitutional.

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2022 15:52:58   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
pegw wrote:
US News and World report leans slightly left and has a high degree of reliability. Just remember that the Democrats had a bill in Congress to insure more reliable voting, and the Republicans blocked it.


The respondents clearly did not read the article, which called for more centralized control of elections (instead of 50 different election administrations), and less litigation (in other words, the losers conceding when they lost), among other reforms. I don't know if newsweek is leftist or not, but the authors were writing pre 2020, and that election certainly proved their points. Slates of 'alternate electors' do not lead to election integrity.

Election integrity is not high on the list of issues for Trump supporters, unless 'integrity' is redefined as Republicans winning all races all the time. They are interested in establishing a one party state, that is all.Then elections will have integrity, according to them.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 15:55:56   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Wrong. You’re so indoctrinated you’d trust the bureaucrats in D.C. to run fair elections. Brilliant. In a Democratic Republic we have the right, and obligation to challenge elections when there are irregularities.

working class stiff wrote:
The respondents clearly did not read the article, which called for more centralized control of elections (instead of 50 different election administrations), and less litigation (in other words, the losers conceding when they lost), among other reforms. I don't know if newsweek is leftist or not, but the authors were writing pre 2020, and that election certainly proved their points. Slates of 'alternate electors' do not lead to election integrity.

Election integrity is not high on the list of issues for Trump supporters, unless 'integrity' is redefined as Republicans winning all races all the time. They are interested in establishing a one party state, that is all.Then elections will have integrity, according to them.
The respondents clearly did not read the article, ... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 16:16:44   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
working class stiff wrote:
The respondents clearly did not read the article, which called for more centralized control of elections (instead of 50 different election administrations), and less litigation (in other words, the losers conceding when they lost), among other reforms. I don't know if newsweek is leftist or not, but the authors were writing pre 2020, and that election certainly proved their points. Slates of 'alternate electors' do not lead to election integrity.

Election integrity is not high on the list of issues for Trump supporters, unless 'integrity' is redefined as Republicans winning all races all the time. They are interested in establishing a one party state, that is all.Then elections will have integrity, according to them.
The respondents clearly did not read the article, ... (show quote)


"Election integrity is not high on the list of issues for Trump supporters," Wut? What is that statement based on??

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 16:28:57   #
American Vet
 
working class stiff wrote:
The respondents clearly did not read the article, which called for more centralized control of elections (instead of 50 different election administrations), and less litigation (in other words, the losers conceding when they lost), among other reforms. I don't know if newsweek is leftist or not, but the authors were writing pre 2020, and that election certainly proved their points. Slates of 'alternate electors' do not lead to election integrity.

Election integrity is not high on the list of issues for Trump supporters, unless 'integrity' is redefined as Republicans winning all races all the time. They are interested in establishing a one party state, that is all.Then elections will have integrity, according to them.
The respondents clearly did not read the article, ... (show quote)


ELWNJ rant and plainly opposed to the Constitution.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.