One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Ex Obama Secret Service on Obama's gun control policy
May 31, 2013 11:56:44   #
zonkedout1 Loc: Wyoming
 
It's not about gun control. It's about people control.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EbPjUJY0sx8

Reply
May 31, 2013 12:19:19   #
usmc4
 
zonkedout1 wrote:
It's not about gun control. It's about people control.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EbPjUJY0sx8


Don Bongino would be a great asset to getting the word out there about the real agenda behind this administrations "people control".

Reply
May 31, 2013 12:22:46   #
zonkedout1 Loc: Wyoming
 
usmc4 wrote:
Don Bongino would be a great asset to getting the word out there about the real agenda behind this administrations "people control".


agreed

Reply
 
 
May 31, 2013 12:38:52   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
usmc4 wrote:
Don Bongino would be a great asset to getting the word out there about the real agenda behind this administrations "people control".


I understand he ran for US Senate in MD during the last election and did well against Ben Cardin.

Do not know what he is doing now.

Oh, not sure, rumor has it he was on Obama's protection detail before leaving Secret Service

Reply
May 31, 2013 12:56:29   #
usmc4
 
AuntiE wrote:
I understand he ran for US Senate in MD during the last election and did well against Ben Cardin.

Do not know what he is doing now.

Oh, not sure, rumor has it he was on Obama's protection detail before leaving Secret Service


Yes, he was the lead agent on the obama detail. He excelled in every stage of training for the Secret Service. He was also chosen to be the Agent in charge of the advanced security detail for obama. I believe he and his wife have started some sort of business. I know one thing for sure, I'd vote for him.

Reply
May 31, 2013 12:58:14   #
willy7
 
zonkedout1 wrote:
It's not about gun control. It's about people control.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EbPjUJY0sx8


Been saying that for years. Nice to know I'm not alone.

Reply
May 31, 2013 13:08:10   #
usmc4
 
AuntiE wrote:
I understand he ran for US Senate in MD during the last election and did well against Ben Cardin.

Do not know what he is doing now.

Oh, not sure, rumor has it he was on Obama's protection detail before leaving Secret Service


AuntiE, I believe his is thinking about running in 2014 for Gov. of Maryland.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 13:02:07   #
zip98053
 
The role of government is to regulate. One of the most visible manifestations of this regulation is the police who try to prevent crimes of violence and enforce things like traffic laws. There are things other than car traffic that needs to be regulated and for them we have different kinds of "police". For example, we have the FAA to regulate airplane traffic and the FDA that regulates the drug industry. History has shown that these industries need this type of policing so that they do less harm to the public.

So, yes, Obama and every other President and legislator who has ever served is about controlling peoples actions. Some individuals think that not being able to do as they damn well please means that the government is attacking their liberties. This is a self-centered view. The government is not trying to limit your ability to do something the government is trying to prevent the other SOB from doing something bad to you. Sometimes, you are the other SOB and that's when the regulations help. Most of the people who were involved in mass shootings were law abiding citizens until that first shot killed that first other person. The purpose of gun control is to try to make sure that law abiding citizens remain law abiding.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 14:09:36   #
zonkedout1 Loc: Wyoming
 
zip98053 wrote:
The role of government is to regulate. One of the most visible manifestations of this regulation is the police who try to prevent crimes of violence and enforce things like traffic laws. There are things other than car traffic that needs to be regulated and for them we have different kinds of "police". For example, we have the FAA to regulate airplane traffic and the FDA that regulates the drug industry. History has shown that these industries need this type of policing so that they do less harm to the public.

So, yes, Obama and every other President and legislator who has ever served is about controlling peoples actions. Some individuals think that not being able to do as they damn well please means that the government is attacking their liberties. This is a self-centered view. The government is not trying to limit your ability to do something the government is trying to prevent the other SOB from doing something bad to you. Sometimes, you are the other SOB and that's when the regulations help. Most of the people who were involved in mass shootings were law abiding citizens until that first shot killed that first other person. The purpose of gun control is to try to make sure that law abiding citizens remain law abiding.
The role of government is to regulate. One of the ... (show quote)


Any fool can write a law, and any fool will follow it.----Henry David Thoreau

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 15:04:31   #
willy7
 
zonkedout1 wrote:
Any fool can write a law, and any fool will follow it.----Henry David Thoreau


Zonker, I think he missed something: to regulate in accordance with the will of the people and always within the limitations of the Constitution of these United States.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 21:44:19   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
willy7 wrote:
Zonker, I think he missed something: to regulate in accordance with the will of the people and always within the limitations of the Constitution of these United States.


And the Constitution of these United States states "shall not be infringed".

If per chance you missed my personal forum some weeks ago relating to the 2nd Amendment please do seek it out. It is called "The Second Amendment Then (1791) The Second Amendment Now (2013).

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 22:10:57   #
zonkedout1 Loc: Wyoming
 
willy7 wrote:
Zonker, I think he missed something: to regulate in accordance with the will of the people and always within the limitations of the Constitution of these United States.


And let's face it. The constitution is plainly written and restrictive. The states have the right to override and restrict the feds (10th). Not applied often, but it will be. Our friends in DC have accrued a lot of power. I used to think Marbury v. Madison was helpful. I'm not so sure. You hear Alito (conservative) say 'Is it moral?' That's not his job. The question is 'Is it constitutional?' and the 4 moonbats up there on that bench are worse.
I've tried to write this post 3 times. My wireless is sketchy. This post gets shorter and less well conceived every time. And homophones have not been my friend that last couple of days. Please forgive any error.

Reply
Jun 2, 2013 01:15:04   #
ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio
 
Precisely the Point!



Reply
Jun 2, 2013 12:29:56   #
willy7
 
AuntiE wrote:
And the Constitution of these United States states "shall not be infringed".

If per chance you missed my personal forum some weeks ago relating to the 2nd Amendment please do seek it out. It is called "The Second Amendment Then (1791) The Second Amendment Now (2013).


Thank you, always appreciate more information.

Reply
Jun 2, 2013 14:18:52   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
zip98053 wrote:
The role of government is to regulate. One of the most visible manifestations of this regulation is the police who try to prevent crimes of violence and enforce things like traffic laws. There are things other than car traffic that needs to be regulated and for them we have different kinds of "police". For example, we have the FAA to regulate airplane traffic and the FDA that regulates the drug industry. History has shown that these industries need this type of policing so that they do less harm to the public.

So, yes, Obama and every other President and legislator who has ever served is about controlling peoples actions. Some individuals think that not being able to do as they damn well please means that the government is attacking their liberties. This is a self-centered view. The government is not trying to limit your ability to do something the government is trying to prevent the other SOB from doing something bad to you. Sometimes, you are the other SOB and that's when the regulations help. Most of the people who were involved in mass shootings were law abiding citizens until that first shot killed that first other person. The purpose of gun control is to try to make sure that law abiding citizens remain law abiding.
The role of government is to regulate. One of the ... (show quote)


If I hadn't read this thread from start to your post I would have wondered what the topic was. You wanted to convince people that government control is so very necessary but I didn't see you talk much about gun control compared to what it really is, people control. Did you watch the introductory link before you wrote? It doesn't seem that you did.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.