336Robin wrote:
Judge Cannon may have temporarily stopped the investigation of the document seized at Maralago but there is another issue-----the missing documents-----they found the folders, where are they?
Trump seems to be causing his own problems and taking and redistributing documents that are the property of the US Government isn't going to help his cause.
Justice Department can move forward with investigation on document Trump still has: former US Attorney
Raw Story - Yesterday 5:46 PM
By Sarah K. Burris
© provided by RawStory
A Justice Department filing on Tuesday revealed its belief that Trump still has documents in his possession despite multiple claims that he has handed over everything.
National Archives staff told the DOJ weeks ago that they believed there were still missing documents, which was echoed in the Tuesday filing.
While U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon has put a temporary stop to any investigation involving the documents seized by the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago, she has no control over the DOJ probe into those Trump still has in his possession, noted former U.S. Attorney Joyce White Vance, who now teaches at the University of Alabama Law School and co-hosts the "Sisters in Law" podcast.
"If there's one takeaway here and it's not certain, but there's more of an implication in this newly released information that the former president did play a role in the provision of information about documents to whoever the lawyer was who certified this information to the Justice Department," Vance explained.
"There's this implication that documents were stored in storage areas and that there was nothing in personal offices," Vance continued. "That seems like the sort of information that would have been likely to come from the former president. This gives DOJ more of a basis to move forward. And, of course, because this involves the grand jury subpoenas and not documents ultimately seized in the search, DOJ is free to move forward without violating Judge Cannon's order."
Judge Cannon may have temporarily stopped the inve... (
show quote)
So, you and your clone are sharing Raw Story! Do you think that you will have better luck under this character’s name? It’s little more than a tabloid! Why do you use these left biased sources while demanding that conservatives use “neutral” sources? You are a pompous arrogant person! Your mind is owned by Trump 24/7! 😎
“Put a link from a reliable neutral source. You're quoting sources that aren't telling you straight. You're allowing your mind to be under their control”………Robin’s statement on the 12th to Parky
https://www.thefactual.com/blog/is-raw-story-a-reliable-news-source/How Factual Is Raw Story?
The Factual’s news-rating algorithm analyzes more than 10,000 articles a day along four metrics: author expertise, publication history, writing tone, and cited sources and quotes. These metrics combine to produce a single percentage score — what we call a Factual Grade — which indicates the overall quality of an article. (See our How It Works page to learn more.) For this study, we analyzed 1,000 articles each from 245 major news sources.
Over a dataset of 1,000 articles, Raw Story scored an average Factual Grade of 56.5%. This is below the 61.9% average for all 245 news sources that we analyzed. This places Raw Story in the 20th percentile of our dataset.
These low scores are driven by Raw Story’s tendency to use inflammatory, emotionally laden language, typical of its click-bait format. At any given time, the homepage of the site showcases numerous articles with problematic titles, such as “Chaos reigns: A Cold War deja vu crisis and a press corps too dumb to understand it” or “Ohio Republicans throw temper tantrum as attempts to cheat with gerrymandering shot down.” Articles also generally lack diverse or extensive evidence, meaning they frequently only link to a handful of sources or link only to other Raw Story articles.
How Opinionated Is Raw Story?
The Factual measures how opinionated an article is using a sophisticated natural language processing algorithm, producing a score we call the Writing Tone. For this metric, the algorithm looks for signs of subjective commentary (e.g., first person pronouns, unnecessary adverbs), as well as the emotional nature of selected words, and sees how prevalent they are for a given length of text. Text which is less opinionated gets higher ratings, with “0” being the most opinionated and “1” being the most neutral.
Raw Story had an average Writing Tone score of 0.45, placing it in the 28th percentile in our dataset. This suggests that articles from the site are often highly opinionated in their writing tone. For reference, the average Writing Tone score for all 245 sources that we analyzed was 0.56.