One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The World Order in Transition. (Second part)
Sep 8, 2022 18:53:02   #
Alber
 
Antonio Gramsci (1891-1973), founder of the Italian Communist Party, in his famous “Jail Notebooks”, says that orthodox socialism, based on the analysis of social phenomena, giving preference to economic factors and class struggle , could not conquer the mind of the population, while they were imbued with the values and principles of Western civilization, proposing the destruction of these values and principles, replacing them with others that would eliminate the natural resistance to Marxism; and for this, it was necessary to take control of the means of education, especially the universities, the media and culture in general. It was necessary to battle in the world of ideas, considering that winning that battle was as important as controlling the means of production. Admitting that it is a slow path, but essential to: teach, train or tame the people, instilling in them the idea of socialism before making the revolution, while they exist within a capitalist society, so that when the system is imposed; it be accepted in the most natural way, since possible resistance would be neutralized beforehand. Phenomena such as Antifa, Black Lives Matter, the LGBT Movement, the Woke or the Cancel Culture, are possible precisely because of the impact caused by the Marxist professors in North American universities who have been teaching their ideas for years, tending to the destruction of the principles and values of Western civilization, according to the doctrines of Gramsci, being able to enumerate a series of tendencies to achieve this end; such as: the critical theory of race, which confronts the races rejecting equality to impose equity and make exceptions benefiting minorities to the detriment of the majority; anthropogenic climate change, to impose rules of conduct on human beings through scientific information manipulated in an intimidating way; feminism, which, trying to eliminate patriarchy, devalues the figure of the father, leading to the crisis of the family, which is the fundamental basis of society; gender ideology and sexual liberation, to pervert the human being, making behaviors that go against nature to be accepted; identity politics, to classify people and be able to manipulate them according to the group they belong to; the dictatorship of what is politically correct, as a gag law to impose what can be expressed, which together with the cancel culture is a threat to the free expression of thought; to which we must add the totalitarian use of the media that impose these trends, censoring and condemning everything that is opposed to them. Particularly noteworthy is the socialist infiltration within the Democratic Party, whose spokespersons include well-known radicals such as Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; but this makes me think that there is some kind of alliance that goes from “real socialism”, passing through “21st century socialism” to reach “globalist progressivism”, because as David Horowitz says in his book The Shadow Party: “ Soros owns the Democratic Party, [through] his networks and it would be really impossible for any democratic politician to run for office, even one holding office, and get elected without the support of the Soros Network.” No wonder that there is collusion between George Soros and Bernie Sanders, because after reading the article 'The secret history of the shadow campaign that saved the 2020 elections', published in Time Magazine on February 4, 2021, written by Molly Ball, it would not be unreasonable to think that there may be other plots to "save democracy", where apparently contrary forces, which control the media, manipulate society, promoting the destruction of the values and principles of Western civilization, trying not to save but to "mold" democracy to the political ideas they support. The SPF, applying tactics similar to those used by the promoters of the NOW, puts into practice the Hegelian dialectic (thesis/antithesis/synthesis), in order to refloat the political entity and position itself before the different challenges of globalization; develops alliances with the European Left; forges the Puebla Group, as its executor, trying to achieve a reconversion on the transnational corruption and criminality scandals that have contaminated the political spaces that it managed to control in Latin America; it marries the UN and its Sustainable Development Program (2030 Agenda); it approaches the Davos Economic Forum, coinciding with the capitalist project of the Great Reset, under a denominator that is common to them: the alienation of democracy and the rule of law; and converges for the future in the Progressive International, born in 2020, in which Bernie Sanders and Yanis Varoufakis assume their global leadership, with their banners of: environmentalism, feminism, deliberative and participatory democracy, post-capitalism, pacifism, liberated identities, etc.. Following in the tactical strategy the teachings for the dismantling of western culture elaborated by the Italian Antonio Gramsci. The SPF has been an instrument similar to the bagpipe, that being the piper dead the bagpipe continues to play; and in this case, the piper was Fidel Castro, who when he was alive, served those who exercised power over the pre-existing world order, first as a “simple collaborator”, when he was recruited by the CIA for his participation in the Bogotazo; and later in 1955, fresh out of prison, on his trip to New York before climbing the Sierra Maestra, he was received at the CFR by David Rockefeller, who became his mentor and “helped him” in his revolutionary efforts, so he became a “pawn” in that game of chess; being received by the tycoon with all honors in 1959, after obtaining power in Cuba, becoming a " knight" in that game. In October 1995, with the USSR having disappeared, Castro visited New York for five days (to attend the celebration of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations), where he would again be invited to a meeting of the CFR, staying at the Rockefeller mansion in Westchester County, when he had already begun to cooperate (as always, from the shadow) to bring about the transition that the group he served wants to impose on the world; to which several countries are opposed, among which are those whose initial letter form BRICS’ group.
China suffered the imposition of Western powers in the nineteenth century, through the introduction of opium and later in part of the twentieth; manaing to emerge like the phoenix, placing itself in an advantageous position, thanks to the fact that it was used by the power group as a counterweight to the USSR fifty years ago; situation that five years later, Den Xiaoping took advantage of to introduce the changes that brought about the resurgence of the country, so the power group of the Asatic Giant fears that would lose the power it has achieved if accepts integration into the NOM. For its part, Russia, which dominated the former USSR, is now its executor, having remained a power due to its great armament; as well as for its territory, equal to that of China and the United States together; in which there are great economic resources, and is trying to recover the power it had under the Soviet empire. China and Russia, economically, in different ways, have developed "cronies' capitalism", as the economists called, to the application that the fascists and the national socialists gave to Marxism in the economic field, being the same thing that the Western group try to impose with its NOM; but they do not reach any tripartite agreement, although they interact, because all the parties intend to maintain hegemony. The truth is that the attempt to impose the NOM is an ambition of the elites, to the detriment of ordinary human beings, whom they try to manipulate by telling them something that is burlesque: “You will have nothing and will be happy”; implying this, that people will not have any property or what is the same: the power to use, enjoy and dispose of any good freely; they will have to depend on someone to make use of something, which is contrary to freedom. Perhaps the elite is considering that it can achieve automation of the production of goods and services; and not needing any manpower, they can do without the majority of human beings, who will find happiness in another life; that is, after death. “You can fool everyone some time. You can fool some all the time. But you can't fool everyone all the time." Abraham Lincoln.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.