If the only way to win an election is to support the murder of innocent unborn children then I would rather lose. Others may win short term political victories but there will be long term consequences. I do not want the GOP to win the House, the Senate, or the White House if it requires the sacrifice of the innocent. There are enough issues on which they can win if they battle like warriors and not wimps.
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the only way to win an election is to support the murder of innocent unborn children then I would rather lose. Others may win short term political victories but there will be long term consequences. I do not want the GOP to win the House, the Senate, or the White House if it requires the sacrifice of the innocent. There are enough issues on which they can win if they battle like warriors and not wimps.
Are you willing to sacrifice your humanity
For unborn gambles in future humanity ?
Assailing women who don’t want to be pregnant to save unborn , unrecognized , zygotes that’s may or may not become babies ? Unwanted babies.
Do you believe , somehow you are on a mission to save humanity ?
From wretched murderous women who refuse to be forced into motherhood by
Religious zealots ?
Do you , really ?
Really ?
Milosia2 wrote:
Are you willing to sacrifice your humanity
For unborn gambles in future humanity ?
Assailing women who don’t want to be pregnant to save unborn , unrecognized , zygotes that’s may or may not become babies ? Unwanted babies.
Do you believe , somehow you are on a mission to save humanity ?
From wretched murderous women who refuse to be forced into motherhood by
Religious zealots ?
Do you , really ?
Really ?
In other words……you support the murder of unwanted babies because some women simply don’t want to be responsible for their mistake of getting pregnant! Here’s the deal…..we are more concerned about the laws of God than pleasing some of society made up of Godless humans like you, little man!
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the only way to win an election is to support the murder of innocent unborn children then I would rather lose. Others may win short term political victories but there will be long term consequences. I do not want the GOP to win the House, the Senate, or the White House if it requires the sacrifice of the innocent. There are enough issues on which they can win if they battle like warriors and not wimps.
I think people are much more concerned with being able to feed the babies they have now than worry about having an unwanted baby down the road!…..and it’s only going to get worse!
TexaCan wrote:
I think people are much more concerned with being able to feed the babies they have now than worry about having an unwanted baby down the road!…..and it’s only going to get worse!
True, but the GOP must be proactive, more pointed on message and get out the vote.
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the only way to win an election is to support the murder of innocent unborn children then I would rather lose. Others may win short term political victories but there will be long term consequences. I do not want the GOP to win the House, the Senate, or the White House if it requires the sacrifice of the innocent. There are enough issues on which they can win if they battle like warriors and not wimps.
Absolutely & well said. Abortion is the central issue of our time & far worse than Auschwitz and The Killing Fields where they had only six years to realize the horrors. This ruthless slaughter had been going on for more than fifty years, way more than sufficient time to organize opposition.
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the only way to win an election is to support the murder of innocent unborn children then I would rather lose. Others may win short term political victories but there will be long term consequences. I do not want the GOP to win the House, the Senate, or the White House if it requires the sacrifice of the innocent. There are enough issues on which they can win if they battle like warriors and not wimps.
I cannot figure out how GOP losses in the House, Senate or White House would require the sacrifice of the innocent. I would think GOP victories would ring in a stronger pro-life era. Evidently you feel otherwise, but I don't get how. Maybe you could restate your thinking on this?
Liberty Tree wrote:
True, but the GOP must be proactive, more pointed on message and get out the vote.
Most definitely! Or, as Trump said……….”fight like hell!”
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the only way to win an election is to support the murder of innocent unborn children then I would rather lose. Others may win short term political victories but there will be long term consequences. I do not want the GOP to win the House, the Senate, or the White House if it requires the sacrifice of the innocent. There are enough issues on which they can win if they battle like warriors and not wimps.
While I agree in principal, in practice we need to win the elections to save that one life, and millions more. I'm opting for moderation in order to win the war. We just won one battle and it is like the Japanese attacking Pearl Harbor. They won that battle, but enraged a furious enemy and lost the war. Let's win the war. We will never be able to eliminate abortion. But we need to minimize it as much as possible. Incremental steps.
Cheers. We are on the same side. Just different approaches.
Logically Right
TexaCan wrote:
In other words……you support the murder of unwanted babies because some women simply don’t want to be responsible for their mistake of getting pregnant! Here’s the deal…..we are more concerned about the laws of God than pleasing some of society made up of Godless humans like you, little man!
It isn’t in other words anything . It is written as it was written.
It’s not in other words anything.
Ive been around this country a lot.
And I haven’t seen one ADT - security protection sign replaced by a
Protected by Jesus Sign !!!!!
Nor a Protected by God sign.
Godless humans like me ?
You don’t know me !!!
I’ll go with ADT Anyday .
And if you’re so protected by the lord , why do you need your basement filled with guns and ammo ?
Seems a bit faulty for a belief , no ?
LogicallyRight wrote:
YES.
Halfwit of the day award goes to ……you !
LogicallyRight wrote:
While I agree in principal, in practice we need to win the elections to save that one life, and millions more. I'm opting for moderation in order to win the war. We just won one battle and it is like the Japanese attacking Pearl Harbor. They won that battle, but enraged a furious enemy and lost the war. Let's win the war. We will never be able to eliminate abortion. But we need to minimize it as much as possible. Incremental steps.
Cheers. We are on the same side. Just different approaches.
Logically Right
While I agree in principal, in practice we need to... (
show quote)
Where is it written that Any Candidate supports murder , of anything ?
That’s quite a leap even for you.
Milosia2 wrote:
Are you willing to sacrifice your humanity
For unborn gambles in future humanity ?
Assailing women who don’t want to be pregnant to save unborn , unrecognized , zygotes that’s may or may not become babies ? Unwanted babies.
Do you believe , somehow you are on a mission to save humanity ?
From wretched murderous women who refuse to be forced into motherhood by
Religious zealots ?
Do you , really ?
Really ?
Apparently you sacrificed your intelligence to post such mindless crap....but thanks for your consistency
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.