Disinformation, political correctness and tyranny.
Disinformation can take several forms: completely false matters are propagated, harmful facts are hidden for convenience or facts are disclosed in a partial and distorted way. Examples of the above are: 1) The Russiagate, created by Hillary Clinton, through a false file created to slander her political opponent in the elections. 2) The laptop forgotten by Hunter Biden containing information about influence peddling involving the "Big Guy" that was ignored by the media. 3) The distortion of the facts, showing them in a partial and sensational way, to exacerbate emotions, as happened in the case of the death of George Floyd, with the aim of using the card of racism.
Now Mr. Joseph Biden, following the orders of those who manage him, creates a repressive organ within the Department of Homeland Security in order to “control disinformation”, which may have the objective of “fighting it”, but which can also serve to “ promote it” and “protect it”.
The creation of this organ is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment and is contrary to the division of powers, since the Executive assumes faculties that correspond to the Legislative and Judicial powers, intending to establish what it considers "politically correct", which constitutes a form of censorship, which would lead us to a tyranny exercised by any party that holds power.
It is ridiculous that this Administration promotes the creation of this repressive organ to combat disinformation, when the party in power is responsible for the disinformation created by the media, which are mostly favorable to it, the basic examples being those that we have mentioned previously.
I think that the creation of this body occurs as a response to the alleged acquisition of Twitter by Mr. Elon Musk, who expressed his opposition to the censorship imposed by this medium, restricting freedom of expression, which would be null and void if he obtains dominance over Twitter.
It seems that this repressive body created by Mr. Biden is a copy of those created by the communists and fascists in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany at the time; that they served Orwel to describe the functions of the Ministry of Truth in his book "1984"; or perhaps by those existing in communist China (now fascist), in Cuba or North Korea.
It is to be hoped that an appeal of unconstitutionality will be imposed against the creation of this repressive body of freedom of expression by any person or organization.
Alber wrote:
Disinformation can take several forms: completely false matters are propagated, harmful facts are hidden for convenience or facts are disclosed in a partial and distorted way. Examples of the above are: 1) The Russiagate, created by Hillary Clinton, through a false file created to slander her political opponent in the elections. 2) The laptop forgotten by Hunter Biden containing information about influence peddling involving the "Big Guy" that was ignored by the media. 3) The distortion of the facts, showing them in a partial and sensational way, to exacerbate emotions, as happened in the case of the death of George Floyd, with the aim of using the card of racism.
Now Mr. Joseph Biden, following the orders of those who manage him, creates a repressive organ within the Department of Homeland Security in order to “control disinformation”, which may have the objective of “fighting it”, but which can also serve to “ promote it” and “protect it”.
The creation of this organ is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment and is contrary to the division of powers, since the Executive assumes faculties that correspond to the Legislative and Judicial powers, intending to establish what it considers "politically correct", which constitutes a form of censorship, which would lead us to a tyranny exercised by any party that holds power.
It is ridiculous that this Administration promotes the creation of this repressive organ to combat disinformation, when the party in power is responsible for the disinformation created by the media, which are mostly favorable to it, the basic examples being those that we have mentioned previously.
I think that the creation of this body occurs as a response to the alleged acquisition of Twitter by Mr. Elon Musk, who expressed his opposition to the censorship imposed by this medium, restricting freedom of expression, which would be null and void if he obtains dominance over Twitter.
It seems that this repressive body created by Mr. Biden is a copy of those created by the communists and fascists in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany at the time; that they served Orwel to describe the functions of the Ministry of Truth in his book "1984"; or perhaps by those existing in communist China (now fascist), in Cuba or North Korea.
It is to be hoped that an appeal of unconstitutionality will be imposed against the creation of this repressive body of freedom of expression by any person or organization.
Disinformation can take several forms: completely ... (
show quote)
The Russians and Iranians are the primary original source of this disinformation. Russian disinformation led to the electoral college putting Trump in office and caused the British to narrowly pass Brexit. Both were designed to weaken the EU and NATO and both nations. Russia, Iran and China have no first amendment rights to pollute our airways or social media with lies and propaganda. Sadly traitorous idiots in both nations read and either believe or support this nonsense at the expense of freedom and democracy. They then spread it virally to their weak minded fellow travelers. Homeland security understands this threat as do patriotic Americans.
And what purpose is served by Homeland Security by eliminating the southern border?
Alber wrote:
Disinformation can take several forms: completely false matters are propagated, harmful facts are hidden for convenience or facts are disclosed in a partial and distorted way. Examples of the above are: 1) The Russiagate, created by Hillary Clinton, through a false file created to slander her political opponent in the elections. 2) The laptop forgotten by Hunter Biden containing information about influence peddling involving the "Big Guy" that was ignored by the media. 3) The distortion of the facts, showing them in a partial and sensational way, to exacerbate emotions, as happened in the case of the death of George Floyd, with the aim of using the card of racism.
Now Mr. Joseph Biden, following the orders of those who manage him, creates a repressive organ within the Department of Homeland Security in order to “control disinformation”, which may have the objective of “fighting it”, but which can also serve to “ promote it” and “protect it”.
The creation of this organ is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment and is contrary to the division of powers, since the Executive assumes faculties that correspond to the Legislative and Judicial powers, intending to establish what it considers "politically correct", which constitutes a form of censorship, which would lead us to a tyranny exercised by any party that holds power.
It is ridiculous that this Administration promotes the creation of this repressive organ to combat disinformation, when the party in power is responsible for the disinformation created by the media, which are mostly favorable to it, the basic examples being those that we have mentioned previously.
I think that the creation of this body occurs as a response to the alleged acquisition of Twitter by Mr. Elon Musk, who expressed his opposition to the censorship imposed by this medium, restricting freedom of expression, which would be null and void if he obtains dominance over Twitter.
It seems that this repressive body created by Mr. Biden is a copy of those created by the communists and fascists in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany at the time; that they served Orwel to describe the functions of the Ministry of Truth in his book "1984"; or perhaps by those existing in communist China (now fascist), in Cuba or North Korea.
It is to be hoped that an appeal of unconstitutionality will be imposed against the creation of this repressive body of freedom of expression by any person or organization.
Disinformation can take several forms: completely ... (
show quote)
Looks like you have swallowed the right wing disinformation campaign. Don't you realize this is meant to destabilize American democracy?
pegw wrote:
Looks like you have swallowed the right wing disinformation campaign. Don't you realize this is meant to destabilize American democracy?
And the left disinformation? You have been had!
Alber wrote:
Disinformation can take several forms: completely false matters are propagated, harmful facts are hidden for convenience or facts are disclosed in a partial and distorted way. Examples of the above are: 1) The Russiagate, created by Hillary Clinton, through a false file created to slander her political opponent in the elections. 2) The laptop forgotten by Hunter Biden containing information about influence peddling involving the "Big Guy" that was ignored by the media. 3) The distortion of the facts, showing them in a partial and sensational way, to exacerbate emotions, as happened in the case of the death of George Floyd, with the aim of using the card of racism.
Now Mr. Joseph Biden, following the orders of those who manage him, creates a repressive organ within the Department of Homeland Security in order to “control disinformation”, which may have the objective of “fighting it”, but which can also serve to “ promote it” and “protect it”.
The creation of this organ is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment and is contrary to the division of powers, since the Executive assumes faculties that correspond to the Legislative and Judicial powers, intending to establish what it considers "politically correct", which constitutes a form of censorship, which would lead us to a tyranny exercised by any party that holds power.
It is ridiculous that this Administration promotes the creation of this repressive organ to combat disinformation, when the party in power is responsible for the disinformation created by the media, which are mostly favorable to it, the basic examples being those that we have mentioned previously.
I think that the creation of this body occurs as a response to the alleged acquisition of Twitter by Mr. Elon Musk, who expressed his opposition to the censorship imposed by this medium, restricting freedom of expression, which would be null and void if he obtains dominance over Twitter.
It seems that this repressive body created by Mr. Biden is a copy of those created by the communists and fascists in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany at the time; that they served Orwel to describe the functions of the Ministry of Truth in his book "1984"; or perhaps by those existing in communist China (now fascist), in Cuba or North Korea.
It is to be hoped that an appeal of unconstitutionality will be imposed against the creation of this repressive body of freedom of expression by any person or organization.
Disinformation can take several forms: completely ... (
show quote)
Gotta laugh....any thread about 'disinformation, political correctness, and tyranny' that skips over the big lie of the stolen election narrative cannot be taken seriously because the presentation itself is , inevitably, disinformation. And shows why the department might be needed.
Combating disinformation is also a form of freedom of speech and trying to stop the exposing of disinformation is a form of censure. We wouldn't need a disinformation bureau if a third of the country's people wouldn't keep spreading manure and false information. You know who I'm talking about.
Kevyn wrote:
The Russians and
Iranians are the primary original source of this disinformation. Russian disinformation led to the electoral college putting Trump in office and caused the British to narrowly pass Brexit. Both were designed to weaken the EU and NATO and both nations. Russia, Iran and China have no first amendment rights to pollute our airways or social media with lies and propaganda. Sadly traitorous idiots in both nations read and either believe or support this nonsense at the expense of freedom and democracy. They then spread it virally to their weak minded fellow travelers. Homeland security understands this threat as do patriotic Americans.
The Russians and br Iranians are the primary orig... (
show quote)
You keep repeating the same lie over and over as it is the gospel truth to spread to your fellow weak-minded travelers. It doesn't matter how often you repeat a lie, it is still a lie. Russian disinformation did not lead to the electoral college putting Trump in Office. The electoral college worked in spite of Russian disinformation. Look in the mirror if you want to see how a traitorous idiot is spreading lies and propaganda to weak-minded fellow travelers undermining liberty.
Clinton’s Campaign Lawyer was working for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and it has revealed:
1) FBI agents confirmed the Department of Justice handed them faulty allegations that originated from Clinton Campaign attorney Michael Sussmann…
2) The New York Post reported a top FBI official “testified he is 100% confident” Sussmann hid his political ties with Hillary Clinton…
3) And now we know Hillary Clinton allegedly PERSONALLY APPROVED the Russia Hoax leak to the media!
Everything we’ve learned so far from the very beginning ties back to Clinton’s Campaign and the massive lies they’ve spread about President Trump.
dtucker300 wrote:
You keep repeating the same lie over and over as it is the gospel truth to spread to your fellow weak-minded travelers. It doesn't matter how often you repeat a lie, it is still a lie. Russian disinformation did not lead to the electoral college putting Trump in Office. The electoral college worked in spite of Russian disinformation. Look in the mirror if you want to see how a traitorous idiot is spreading lies and propaganda to weak-minded fellow travelers undermining liberty.
And you continue to believe Americans would have elected a failure without hostile to America interference.
RascalRiley wrote:
And you continue to believe Americans would have elected a looser without hostile to America interference.
You weren't elected president!
JR-57
Loc: South Carolina
RascalRiley wrote:
And you continue to believe Americans would have elected a failure without hostile to America interference.
Are you talking about Biden?
JR-57
Loc: South Carolina
RascalRiley wrote:
Nice deflection.
Deflection? I stayed on topic trying to clarify your innuendo.
JR-57 wrote:
Deflection? I stayed on topic trying to clarify your innuendo.
Trump’s win is the topic of discussion.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.