Jack2014 wrote:
If it's not a living Constitution,how do you remotely justify guns of all types in private possession w/o being connected to lo
Al militia? Or,better yet,why aren't they restricted to musketss
Try hard on this one,this time Kokomo jomo!
Try reading the Federalist Papers some time idiot and you will find out exactly what it means. But then idiots like you can't understand all those big words, so you just spout off knowing nothing about what is being discussed or what you are talking about. The second amendment was put in there for idiots like you in simple words so even you can understand it, but you still can't understand what they were talking about can you.
Just this once I am going to give you an education on the 2nd amendment, but this is the last time. I don't have time to educate you on everything you are lacking in.
***************************************************
"Of course we have the God-given right to keep and bear arms, to self-defense, etc., etc. Our Declaration of Independence (2nd para) recognizes that our Rights come from God and are unalienable.
The 2nd Amendment to our federal Constitution recognizes that this God-given right to keep and bear arms is to be free from any interference WHATSOEVER from the federal government.
Our Framers were all for an armed American People they understood that arms are our ultimate defense in the event the federal government oversteps its bounds. See, e.g., what James Madison, Father of Our Constitution, writes in the second half of Federalist Paper No. 46! The reason the Citizens the Militia are armed is to defend ourselves, our families, our neighborhoods, communities, and States from an overreaching, tyrannical federal government.
Accordingly, the federal government is nowhere in the Constitution granted authority to abridge, restrict, or infringe, in any fashion whatsoever, guns, ammunition, etc. Thus, ALL such restrictive laws made by Congress, and ALL regulations made by the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, and Tobacco (ATF), are unconstitutional as outside the scope of the powers granted to Congress and to the Executive Branch by our Constitution. Restriction of arms and ammunition is NOT one of the enumerated powers delegated to Congress or the Executive Branch.
Furthermore, all pretended regulations made by the ATF are also unconstitutional as in violation of Art. I, Sec. 1, U.S. Constitution, which vests ALL legislative powers granted by the Constitution in CONGRESS. Executive agencies have no lawful authority whatsoever to make rules or regulations of general application to The People!
In addition, the President and the Senate may not lawfully by treaty do anything the Constitution does not authorize them to do directly. Since the Constitution does not authorize the federal government to disarm us, the federal government may not lawfully do it by Treaty. See,
http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/2009/09/19/the-treaty-making-power-of-the-united-states/"The above quotes are taken for here;
http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/2nd-amendment/***************************************************
You can go there to read the entire article and maybe you will learn something. Try reading EVERYTHING she wrote and you will know more about the Constitution them most people ever learn.
You have a choice, you can either do some reading and educate yourself, or you can remain ignorant and continue to spout off about things you know little to nothing about. It's up to you to do the education, because we are not responsible for your education, you are.
By the way, what the heck is a lo Al militia????????