Scientific Journal Censorship
Jan 21, 2022 06:02:34 #
What does the man behind the curtain do when a researcher announces information that conflicts with the Vaccine "Narrative" that has been promoted since the beginning of the pandemic? Answer: CENSORSHIP.
BACKSTORY:
Jessica Rose is an academic who received her PhD in computational biology from the Bar-Ilan University in Israel. "She teamed up with Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, to write a paper on VAERS reports of myocarditis in youth—an issue already acknowledged as a side effect of the vaccination, though usually described as rare."
They published an academic paper on the website of the scientific journal Elsevier, which reported "19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for{the 12-15 yr old} age group.”
After two weeks, on Oct. 15, the paper disappeared from the Elsevier website, replaced by a notice of “Temporary Removal.” Not only weren’t the authors told why, they weren’t informed at all, according to Rose.
When they brought up the issue with the journal, they were first told the paper was pulled because it wasn’t “invited,” Rose said. That was shot down as irrelevant by McCullough, who threatened to sue for breach of contract. The journal then turned to its terms of use, saying it has the right to refuse any paper for any reason.
It’s still not clear why the paper was pulled.
“I do apologise, but Elsevier cannot comment on this enquiry,” said Jonathan Davis, the journal’s communications officer".
My Comment:
Perhaps the answer to the reason behind the "censorship" of this paper is contained in the following additional information in the article:
"The paper also called the vaccines “injectable biological products”—a reference to the fact that they are distinct from all other traditional vaccines.
A traditional vaccine uses “whole live or attenuated pathogens” while the COVID vaccines use “mRNA in lipid nanoparticles,” Rose explained via email. She said the lipid nanoparticles include “cationic lipids which are highly toxic.” Pfizer, the manufacturer of the most popular COVID-19 vaccine in many countries, addressed the issue by saying the dose is sufficiently low to ensure “an acceptable safety margin,” according to the European drug authority, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (pdf).
I'm pretty sure that reassurance will be of little comfort to those young people who will need to live with the consequences of myocarditis for the rest of their lives, all because of a "virus" that has an absolute risk of death of 2 in million!
https://www.theepochtimes.com/researcher-calls-out-censorship-after-journal-pulls-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-events-analysis_4221081.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge
BACKSTORY:
Jessica Rose is an academic who received her PhD in computational biology from the Bar-Ilan University in Israel. "She teamed up with Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, to write a paper on VAERS reports of myocarditis in youth—an issue already acknowledged as a side effect of the vaccination, though usually described as rare."
They published an academic paper on the website of the scientific journal Elsevier, which reported "19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for{the 12-15 yr old} age group.”
After two weeks, on Oct. 15, the paper disappeared from the Elsevier website, replaced by a notice of “Temporary Removal.” Not only weren’t the authors told why, they weren’t informed at all, according to Rose.
When they brought up the issue with the journal, they were first told the paper was pulled because it wasn’t “invited,” Rose said. That was shot down as irrelevant by McCullough, who threatened to sue for breach of contract. The journal then turned to its terms of use, saying it has the right to refuse any paper for any reason.
It’s still not clear why the paper was pulled.
“I do apologise, but Elsevier cannot comment on this enquiry,” said Jonathan Davis, the journal’s communications officer".
My Comment:
Perhaps the answer to the reason behind the "censorship" of this paper is contained in the following additional information in the article:
"The paper also called the vaccines “injectable biological products”—a reference to the fact that they are distinct from all other traditional vaccines.
A traditional vaccine uses “whole live or attenuated pathogens” while the COVID vaccines use “mRNA in lipid nanoparticles,” Rose explained via email. She said the lipid nanoparticles include “cationic lipids which are highly toxic.” Pfizer, the manufacturer of the most popular COVID-19 vaccine in many countries, addressed the issue by saying the dose is sufficiently low to ensure “an acceptable safety margin,” according to the European drug authority, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (pdf).
I'm pretty sure that reassurance will be of little comfort to those young people who will need to live with the consequences of myocarditis for the rest of their lives, all because of a "virus" that has an absolute risk of death of 2 in million!
https://www.theepochtimes.com/researcher-calls-out-censorship-after-journal-pulls-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-events-analysis_4221081.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.