Capt-jack Loc: Home

DOMINION VOTING Releases Terrifying Statement That Is WIll Turn Your Blood Cold

The Denver-based company, Dominion Voting Systems, released a very revealing statement on Thursday.

The Arizona Senate’s demand for passwords to ballot tabulators- and Dominion has a response to their request.

Maricopa County elections witness Jan Bryant testified before the Arizona legislature back on November 30, 2020. Bryant said that Maricopa County officials DID NOT RUN THE ELECTION!

Two Dominion employees in the audit center ran the election. This explains why Maricopa County officials do not have Admin passwords or access to the Dominion voting machines. They never had them!

Dominion was refusing to comply with the subpoena to turn over the passwords, according to America’s Audit Director Ken Bennett told OAN earlier in the week.

What are they hiding?

In their statement published today Dominion attacked the forensic auditing team performing the audit.

Dominion defended the controversial EAC group that rubber-stamped the previous counting of ballots.

And Dominion then said they will not release the passwords to the Maricopa County voting machines.
They will NOT ALLOW any auditors to look at their machines.

This is very telling. What are they afraid of?

According to Brahm Resnik Twitter post, “NEW “No company should be compelled to participate in such an irresponsible act”: Dominion Voting Systems responds to Arizona Senate Republicans’ demand for passwords to ballot tabulators.”

NEW “No company should be compelled to participate in such an irresponsible act”: Dominion Voting Systems responds to Arizona Senate Republicans’ demand for passwords to ballot tabulators.

If Dominion had access to the machines, and Maricopa County did not, then WHO DELETED THE DATABASE?
Subpoena their asses, NOW!

Now, one must conclude if all is on the up and up, why would they act this way?
They are indeed hiding a lot of cheating!

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Capt-jack Loc: Home

A loss for words.

Gatsby

It appears that Dominion has much to Hide , much to Lose , and much to Fear .

Michael10

Trump refused 9 Subpoenas, by your logic he must have a lot to hide, lose and fear.

tbutkovich

Dominion worked the voting machines in Venezuela and look what happened to that country. Now, they are working the machines in America. The outcome will be the same, a single party dictatorship like Chavez and the Chavistas, his supporters. The only way to preclude this from happening in this country is to indict, charge and prosecute these senior officials. The charge should be “treason” and the penalty “life imprisonment!”

vernon

Is Soros one of the investors in dominion ?

vernon

Name one president that honored a subpoena from congress.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Presidents do that. It's called Executive Privilege. Often they use National Security as the reason. Guess you conveniently forgot Eric Holder and Fast and Furious. What a dishonest poster you are. fortunately most see your hate and bias for what it is.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I also wonder how leftists like the ones on this site don't want these questions answered. Because, if there was cheating, they don't want it to be found out, such is their hate for the USA.

Capt-jack Loc: Home

Since you had a poor education you do not understand much. You can not, sue, indite, or subpoena a seating President.

Keep up the funny posts, I love them, lol.

Michael10

Bill Clinton, the subpoena was withdrawn when he agreed to testify.

America 1 Loc: South Miami

The difference between a president and a company.
Most subpoenas are used to require a person who is not already a party in the case to attend the hearing or bring documents. If the person is already a party in the case, you do not have to complete a subpoena. Instead, you can use a Notice to Attend Hearing or Trial.

Michael10

That is not true, once again your ignorance precedes you. justices ruled in 1974 that President Richard Nixon could be subpoenaed. He resigned before he had to testify,

_ Thomas Jefferson was subpoenaed declined to comply but ultimately produced material in the treason trial of his former vice president, Aaron Burr.

— Nixon was subpoenaed resigned and the issue went away.

— The Clinton subpoena was withdrawn when he agreed to testify voluntarily.

The question if presidential subpoenaed falls under Executive Privilege which is never talked about in the Constitution of the United States

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

When someone is subpoenaed they have a right under the law to challenge the subpoena. The court will decide if the subpoena is valid or not. If the subpoena is valid, the person under subpoena is compelled to comply or face penalties from the court. Has Trump failed to comply with any subpoenas that have been ruled valid by a court? Of so, please cite the case.