PeterS

Oh, I don't...

America 1 Loc: South Miami

No doubt you and the Rev. cannot face reality.

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

What a loser.....

Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle

I don't recognize the Jesus this "reverend "
claims to follow.
The Jesus i know gave a commission to preach good news and make deciples, leaving judgment to God.
This is one of the non gracious Judiazers
that the apostle Paul warned about.

Kevyn

Wow! You are finally recognizing Trumps humiliating defeat and the big lie.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

That’s,
Invincible Defeat !

3507

I do "blame", at least within my own mind, in the way I think about things. I blame Trump for lots of things. But I think it's more important to "blame" or to "figure out" what it was that made such a person become the President of the U.S.A.

Also, the reverend is right ("Name all those who have ... covered for [Trump]").

There are lots of inexperienced, or ignorant, or sleazy, or mean-spirited people. Mr. Trump isn't the only one. But why would so many people think that's all there is to humanity, or to governing, or to reasoning?

I can't imagine the Democrat party (fault-ridden as it may also be) coming up with such people as these Republican presidents (whom I really dislike a lot, and whom I think were very bad presidents) as primary election winners and endorsed candidates for the general elections: Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, and Donald Trump.

But this is what the Republican Party (collectively, in the majority of it, to an overwhelming degree) has become -- a party of know-nothings. They want a "good 'ol boy" and after that point they stop thinking.

ChJoe

If we end up in a war, I blame Obama. He's the one who has stirred up all the racism world wide, empowering radical Islam, negotiating with Islamic terrorists, releasing terrorists, etc, etc.

I mean, seriously, Trump had all kinds of opportunities to go to war and yet he didn't.

3507

Obama "stirred up racism"? "empowered radical Islam"? I don't see it.

As for "negotiating with Islamic terrorists", wouldn't that description fit Reagan better?

(It's a curious thing, but in this country (the U.S.A.) one doesn't often hear about "negotiating with Jewish terrorists" or other countries "negotiating with American terrorists".)

I think you are right about Trump not going "to war" in the conventional sense of "going to war". And that is one good thing about the Trump presidency. I'm glad the U.S. didn't go to war in that sense. But I think any other recent president (except George W. Bush) or any other recent presidential candidate would have done as well in that.

However, he (Trump) empowered a lot of hatred and bigotry, and he "aided and abetted" the Covid-19 virus, and he did all he could to destroy democracy. It's not clear to me how this stacks up against a conventional "going to war" -- which is worse or better.

But at least my children aren't getting shot at yet, nor having to kill for somebody else's excuse for a war. And for this I'm happy. None of my immediate family has any long-term effects from Covid yet either; I hope their good health continues.

Trump was involved (being the primary instigator) with the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection (which isn't entirely over yet) but so far that doesn't look like a conventional war (though pretty close to it, on Jan. 6 -- maybe the difference has been a matter of luck).

We still don't know whether there will be a war ("civil-" or otherwise) coming later as a result of the Trump presidency; for example, North Korea or Russia or even China might start one as a development stemming, in part, from the Trump presidency. The effects of presidential terms are not self-contained in neat four-year packages. The most likely war stemming from the Trump presidency would probably be a civil war within the U.S. I bet Russia would be proud if that occurs. And some other countries might be happy about it too.

Another _good_ thing about the Trump presidency is that he didn't actually personally shoot anybody gratuitously while in office. (Nor, in Trump's case, while not in office.) But I think all the other presidents could claim the same distinction. I wonder how the next Republican presidency will turn out?

ChJoe

"Obama "stirred up racism"? "empowered radical Islam"? I don't see it." You had your eyes shut. Are you Don Lemon?

Review "Barack Obama's negotiation with the Taliban Five."

""aided and abetted" the Covid-19 virus" ???????? Right. Operation Warp Speed, vaccines in under a year. Are you Joe Biden who got vaccinated during the Trump administration and later claimed there was no vaccine when he became president??


So much of your post is hardly worth responding to, it is so full of lies, innuendo, twisted truth (lies), and blind Trump hate. Reading it was like listening to the most idiotic of CNN's "reporting."

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

Do you even understand the English language?

3507

Thank you for the feedback.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Your eyes were wide shut.

In February, 1979, the Islamic revolution in Iran replaced the pro-western Shah with an Islamic theocracy known as the Islamic Republic of Iran. Nine months later, in November, 1979, Iranian militants took over the American embassy in Tehran and held 55 Americans hostage. 444 days later, on January 20, 1981, Ronald Reagan was inaugurated as POTUS. On that same day, Iran released the hostages.

Yeah, president Reagan "negotiated" with the Iranian terrorists without saying a word to them. Those subhuman cockroaches were under no illusions that Reagan was not a man with whom to fk.

Dragnet

Trump is the greatest president since Lincoln.
Trump ‘24 !!!!

microphor Loc: Home is TN

if we end up in war, it will be Biden doing it. Trumps gone people
And when he left, we were at peace with the exception of a small military remaining iln the middle east, we had pretty much put that to bed till Biden decided to start the flow of money into then hands of Iran/Hamas.