One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Shocker: Why is this substance in the Moderna COVID vaccine?
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 19, 2021 14:10:37   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/19/shocker-why-is-this-substance-in-the-moderna-covid-vaccine/

It’s called SM-102.

Verifying that it is in the Moderna COVID vaccine, I find a 12/30/20 CDC document titled: “COVID-19 Vaccines: Update on Allergic Reactions, Contraindications, and Precautions.” [1]

If you scroll down halfway through the document, you’ll see a chart titled, “Ingredients Included in mRNA COVID vaccines.” (pg 20)

The right-hand side of the chart shows ingredients in the Moderna vaccine. The fifth ingredient down is “SM-102: heptadecan-9-yl 8-((2-hydroxyethyl) (6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy) hexyl) amino) octanoate.”

Now we go to a document published by the Cayman Chemical Company of Ann Arbor, Michigan: “Safety Data Sheet acc. to OSHA HCS.” (04/11/2021) [2]

This data sheet lists the effects of SM-102. Here is the opening note: “For research use only, not for human or veterinary use.”

Far from comforting.

Then the safety data sheet lights up with adverse effects/warnings re SM-102. For example: “Suspected of causing cancer. Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child. Causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure. Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects.”

Several things to point out here. First, what dosage level of, and what duration of exposure to, SM-102 are we talking about? Details on these toxicity factors need to be known. HOWEVER, all that is overridden by the fact that SM-102 is being INJECTED into the body via the Moderna shot. We’re not just talking about inhalation or skin contact.

Obviously, the human body has layers of defense against attack. With injection, a number of those layers are bypassed.

And once deep within the body, where does SM-102 travel as it causes damage along the way?

I doubt that the Cayman safety data sheet even considered the possibility that SM-102 would be injected.

The experts and authorities will assure us SM-102 is safe. They’ll say only miniscule amounts are being injected. They’ll say the clinical trials of the vaccine revealed no problems. They’ll parrot, over and over again, as they always do: “safe and effective.”

You’re walking along a country path. You see a snake lying just ahead of you. He slowly raises his head and looks at you. On his hood, you read the words: “emergency use authorization granted.”

SOURCES:

[1] https://emergency.cdc.gov/coca/ppt/2020/dec-30-coca-call.pdf

[1b] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RcgAXSKQyw

[1b1] https://youtu.be/9RcgAXSKQyw?t=638

[1b2] https://youtu.be/9RcgAXSKQyw?t=840

[2] https://www.caymanchem.com/msdss/33474m.pdf

Reply
May 19, 2021 14:22:17   #
skyrider
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/19/shocker-why-is-this-substance-in-the-moderna-covid-vaccine/

It’s called SM-102.

Verifying that it is in the Moderna COVID vaccine, I find a 12/30/20 CDC document titled: “COVID-19 Vaccines: Update on Allergic Reactions, Contraindications, and Precautions.” [1]

If you scroll down halfway through the document, you’ll see a chart titled, “Ingredients Included in mRNA COVID vaccines.” (pg 20)

The right-hand side of the chart shows ingredients in the Moderna vaccine. The fifth ingredient down is “SM-102: heptadecan-9-yl 8-((2-hydroxyethyl) (6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy) hexyl) amino) octanoate.”

Now we go to a document published by the Cayman Chemical Company of Ann Arbor, Michigan: “Safety Data Sheet acc. to OSHA HCS.” (04/11/2021) [2]

This data sheet lists the effects of SM-102. Here is the opening note: “For research use only, not for human or veterinary use.”

Far from comforting.

Then the safety data sheet lights up with adverse effects/warnings re SM-102. For example: “Suspected of causing cancer. Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child. Causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure. Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects.”

Several things to point out here. First, what dosage level of, and what duration of exposure to, SM-102 are we talking about? Details on these toxicity factors need to be known. HOWEVER, all that is overridden by the fact that SM-102 is being INJECTED into the body via the Moderna shot. We’re not just talking about inhalation or skin contact.

Obviously, the human body has layers of defense against attack. With injection, a number of those layers are bypassed.

And once deep within the body, where does SM-102 travel as it causes damage along the way?

I doubt that the Cayman safety data sheet even considered the possibility that SM-102 would be injected.

The experts and authorities will assure us SM-102 is safe. They’ll say only miniscule amounts are being injected. They’ll say the clinical trials of the vaccine revealed no problems. They’ll parrot, over and over again, as they always do: “safe and effective.”

You’re walking along a country path. You see a snake lying just ahead of you. He slowly raises his head and looks at you. On his hood, you read the words: “emergency use authorization granted.”

SOURCES:

[1] https://emergency.cdc.gov/coca/ppt/2020/dec-30-coca-call.pdf

[1b] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RcgAXSKQyw

[1b1] https://youtu.be/9RcgAXSKQyw?t=638

[1b2] https://youtu.be/9RcgAXSKQyw?t=840

[2] https://www.caymanchem.com/msdss/33474m.pdf
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/19/shocker... (show quote)


Ginny, In a normal world, with all the negative information about the "Vax" which is verifiable, even the dumbest
of people should be able to take notice. The fact that they don't reinforces my opinion that the biggest pandemic of all time is mass insanity.

Reply
May 19, 2021 14:37:41   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
And the list goes on, growing and growing every day. If not confident that it is for you, don't. Just say no.

Remember that campaign. Just say no.

Also remember some friend telling you to take a puff on your first cigarette. You'll like it. Then it was take a drink, you'll like it and it makes you feel good. Let's have sex. It is fun. Don't worry, we'll use a condom. (Until we don't). Then it was grass. It'll make you feel good, then meth and heroin and finally fentanyl. You won't die from an overdose. (Until you do.)

It is no longer a friend trying to talk you into some questionable thing. It is a know nothing politician taking advice from a medical mouth piece who hasn't worked in his field to any great extent (Fauci) in years. And he flips back and forth according to the winds of the time (Politics). Now it is a vaccine, untested and not approved by the FDA except as an emergency experimental drug. First the President tells you to take it. Then pushes it. And the the Governor and Mayor and then your boss (if you want to keep your job) and your school (or you can't come) and now your friends, (or we won't play with or associate with you. And then rules that you can't go anywhere without a vaccine passport.

These drugs were hastily put together and unproven to satisfactory levels to stop a virus that doesn't often kill and then usually only the unhealthy for various reasons. And often you don't even know you had it or when or where you might have caught it.

People have died from the drugs and are all to often suffering form weird reactions that might be permanent. They may affect reproductive issues far into the future. And now we are finding out that the drug might, in slight levels, (but possibly harmful), be passed on through casual contact, breathing and with sexual contact.

And all along, these so called leaders say to follow the science and then deny any hints of alternative science from reputable experts, to their unproven drugs.

No thanks. I'll take my chances. You be the guinea pigs.

Reply
 
 
May 19, 2021 14:50:44   #
SWMBO
 
skyrider wrote:
Ginny, In a normal world, with all the negative information about the "Vax" which is verifiable, even the dumbest
of people should be able to take notice. The fact that they don't reinforces my opinion that the biggest pandemic of all time is mass insanity.


You are right on target!!

SWMBO

Reply
May 19, 2021 14:57:41   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
skyrider wrote:
Ginny, In a normal world, with all the negative information about the "Vax" which is verifiable, even the dumbest
of people should be able to take notice. The fact that they don't reinforces my opinion that the biggest pandemic of all time is mass insanity.


I agree!!

Reply
May 19, 2021 15:01:46   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
And the list goes on, growing and growing every day. If not confident that it is for you, don't. Just say no.

Remember that campaign. Just say no.

Also remember some friend telling you to take a puff on your first cigarette. You'll like it. Then it was take a drink, you'll like it and it makes you feel good. Let's have sex. It is fun. Don't worry, we'll use a condom. (Until we don't). Then it was grass. It'll make you feel good, then meth and heroin and finally fentanyl. You won't die from an overdose. (Until you do.)

It is no longer a friend trying to talk you into some questionable thing. It is a know nothing politician taking advice from a medical mouth piece who hasn't worked in his field to any great extent (Fauci) in years. And he flips back and forth according to the winds of the time (Politics). Now it is a vaccine, untested and not approved by the FDA except as an emergency experimental drug. First the President tells you to take it. Then pushes it. And the the Governor and Mayor and then your boss (if you want to keep your job) and your school (or you can't come) and now your friends, (or we won't play with or associate with you. And then rules that you can't go anywhere without a vaccine passport.

These drugs were hastily put together and unproven to satisfactory levels to stop a virus that doesn't often kill and then usually only the unhealthy for various reasons. And often you don't even know you had it or when or where you might have caught it.

People have died from the drugs and are all to often suffering form weird reactions that might be permanent. They may affect reproductive issues far into the future. And now we are finding out that the drug might, in slight levels, (but possibly harmful), be passed on through casual contact, breathing and with sexual contact.

And all along, these so called leaders say to follow the science and then deny any hints of alternative science from reputable experts, to their unproven drugs.

No thanks. I'll take my chances. You be the guinea pigs.
And the list goes on, growing and growing every da... (show quote)




I said 'no' and will keep saying 'no' for as long as I'm alive. I wonder if the "Vaccination Passport" will become a county by county thing eventually?

Reply
May 19, 2021 15:18:55   #
skyrider
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:


I said 'no' and will keep saying 'no' for as long as I'm alive. I wonder if the "Vaccination Passport" will become a county by county thing eventually?


You forgot the "r" . It will become a country by country thing. "your papers please".
Seriously depressing.

Reply
 
 
May 19, 2021 15:27:53   #
BearK Loc: TN
 
Epidemics and pandemics with at least 1 million deaths
Rank Epidemics/pandemics Disease Death toll Global population lost Regional population lost Date Location
1 Black Death Bubonic plague 75–200 million [Note 1] 30–60% of European population[8] 1346–1353 Europe, Asia, and North Africa
2 Spanish flu Influenza A/H1N1 17–100 million 1–5.4%[9][10] – 1918–1920 Worldwide
3 Plague of Justinian Bubonic plague 15–100 million [Note 1] 25–60% of European population[11] 541–549 Europe and West Asia
4 HIV/AIDS pandemic HIV/AIDS 35 million+ (as of 2018) [Note 2] – 1981–present Worldwide
5 Third plague pandemic Plague 12–15 million [Note 2] – 1855–1960 Worldwide
6 Cocoliztli Epidemic of 1545–1548 Cocoliztli 5–15 million [Note 1] 27–80% of Mexican population[12] 1545–1548 Mexico
7 Antonine Plague Smallpox or measles 5–10 million 3–6%[7] 25–33% of Roman population[13] 165–180 (possibly up to 190) Roman Empire
8 1520 Mexico smallpox epidemic Smallpox 5–8 million [Note 1] 23–37% of Mexican population[12] 1519–1520 Mexico
9 COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 3.4 million+ (reported)–
7.2 million (estimated) (as of May 2021)

0.04%–
0.1% (estimated)[6]

– 2020–present Worldwide
10 1918–1922 Russia typhus epidemic Typhus 2–3 million 0.1–0.16%[14][Note 3] 1–1.6% of Russian population[15] 1918–1922 Russia
11 1957–1958 influenza pandemic Influenza A/H2N2 1–4 million 0.03–0.1%[6] – 1957–1958 Worldwide
Hong Kong flu Influenza A/H3N2 1–4 million 0.03–0.1%[6] – 1968–1969 Worldwide
13 Cocoliztli epidemic of 1576 Cocoliztli 2–2.5 million 0.4–0.5%[7] 50% of Mexican population[12] 1576–1580 Mexico
14 735–737 Japanese smallpox epidemic Smallpox 2 million 1%[7] 33% of Japanese population[16] 735–737 Japan
1772–1773 Persian Plague Bubonic plague 2 million 0.2–0.3%[7] [Note 4] 1772–1773 Persia
16 Naples Plague Plague 1.25 million 0.2%[7] [Note 4] 1656–1658 Southern Italy
17 Third cholera pandemic Cholera 1 million+ 0.08%[7] – 1846–1860 Worldwide
18 1629–1631 Italian plague Bubonic plague 1 million 0.2%[7] [Note 4] 1629–1631 Italy
1889–1890 flu pandemic Influenza 1 million 0.07%[7] – 1889–1890 Worldwide

Reply
May 19, 2021 16:58:25   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/19/shocker-why-is-this-substance-in-the-moderna-covid-vaccine/

It’s called SM-102.

Verifying that it is in the Moderna COVID vaccine, I find a 12/30/20 CDC document titled: “COVID-19 Vaccines: Update on Allergic Reactions, Contraindications, and Precautions.” [1]

If you scroll down halfway through the document, you’ll see a chart titled, “Ingredients Included in mRNA COVID vaccines.” (pg 20)

The right-hand side of the chart shows ingredients in the Moderna vaccine. The fifth ingredient down is “SM-102: heptadecan-9-yl 8-((2-hydroxyethyl) (6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy) hexyl) amino) octanoate.”

Now we go to a document published by the Cayman Chemical Company of Ann Arbor, Michigan: “Safety Data Sheet acc. to OSHA HCS.” (04/11/2021) [2]

This data sheet lists the effects of SM-102. Here is the opening note: “For research use only, not for human or veterinary use.”

Far from comforting.

Then the safety data sheet lights up with adverse effects/warnings re SM-102. For example: “Suspected of causing cancer. Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child. Causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure. Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects.”

Several things to point out here. First, what dosage level of, and what duration of exposure to, SM-102 are we talking about? Details on these toxicity factors need to be known. HOWEVER, all that is overridden by the fact that SM-102 is being INJECTED into the body via the Moderna shot. We’re not just talking about inhalation or skin contact.

Obviously, the human body has layers of defense against attack. With injection, a number of those layers are bypassed.

And once deep within the body, where does SM-102 travel as it causes damage along the way?

I doubt that the Cayman safety data sheet even considered the possibility that SM-102 would be injected.

The experts and authorities will assure us SM-102 is safe. They’ll say only miniscule amounts are being injected. They’ll say the clinical trials of the vaccine revealed no problems. They’ll parrot, over and over again, as they always do: “safe and effective.”

You’re walking along a country path. You see a snake lying just ahead of you. He slowly raises his head and looks at you. On his hood, you read the words: “emergency use authorization granted.”

SOURCES:

[1] https://emergency.cdc.gov/coca/ppt/2020/dec-30-coca-call.pdf

[1b] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RcgAXSKQyw

[1b1] https://youtu.be/9RcgAXSKQyw?t=638

[1b2] https://youtu.be/9RcgAXSKQyw?t=840

[2] https://www.caymanchem.com/msdss/33474m.pdf
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/19/shocker... (show quote)


Do you know how much is in each injection? You inhale more carcinogens with each breath.

Reply
May 19, 2021 16:59:19   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
skyrider wrote:
You forgot the "r" . It will become a country by country thing. "your papers please".
Seriously depressing.


No, I meant county. Dems are nitpicky! A lot of us never travel outside of the country - so they'll find a way to get us, too.

Reply
May 19, 2021 17:05:27   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
BearK wrote:
Epidemics and pandemics with at least 1 million deaths
Rank Epidemics/pandemics Disease Death toll Global population lost Regional population lost Date Location
1 Black Death Bubonic plague 75–200 million [Note 1] 30–60% of European population[8] 1346–1353 Europe, Asia, and North Africa
2 Spanish flu Influenza A/H1N1 17–100 million 1–5.4%[9][10] – 1918–1920 Worldwide
3 Plague of Justinian Bubonic plague 15–100 million [Note 1] 25–60% of European population[11] 541–549 Europe and West Asia
4 HIV/AIDS pandemic HIV/AIDS 35 million+ (as of 2018) [Note 2] – 1981–present Worldwide
5 Third plague pandemic Plague 12–15 million [Note 2] – 1855–1960 Worldwide
6 Cocoliztli Epidemic of 1545–1548 Cocoliztli 5–15 million [Note 1] 27–80% of Mexican population[12] 1545–1548 Mexico
7 Antonine Plague Smallpox or measles 5–10 million 3–6%[7] 25–33% of Roman population[13] 165–180 (possibly up to 190) Roman Empire
8 1520 Mexico smallpox epidemic Smallpox 5–8 million [Note 1] 23–37% of Mexican population[12] 1519–1520 Mexico
9 COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 3.4 million+ (reported)–
7.2 million (estimated) (as of May 2021)

0.04%–
0.1% (estimated)[6]

– 2020–present Worldwide
10 1918–1922 Russia typhus epidemic Typhus 2–3 million 0.1–0.16%[14][Note 3] 1–1.6% of Russian population[15] 1918–1922 Russia
11 1957–1958 influenza pandemic Influenza A/H2N2 1–4 million 0.03–0.1%[6] – 1957–1958 Worldwide
Hong Kong flu Influenza A/H3N2 1–4 million 0.03–0.1%[6] – 1968–1969 Worldwide
13 Cocoliztli epidemic of 1576 Cocoliztli 2–2.5 million 0.4–0.5%[7] 50% of Mexican population[12] 1576–1580 Mexico
14 735–737 Japanese smallpox epidemic Smallpox 2 million 1%[7] 33% of Japanese population[16] 735–737 Japan
1772–1773 Persian Plague Bubonic plague 2 million 0.2–0.3%[7] [Note 4] 1772–1773 Persia
16 Naples Plague Plague 1.25 million 0.2%[7] [Note 4] 1656–1658 Southern Italy
17 Third cholera pandemic Cholera 1 million+ 0.08%[7] – 1846–1860 Worldwide
18 1629–1631 Italian plague Bubonic plague 1 million 0.2%[7] [Note 4] 1629–1631 Italy
1889–1890 flu pandemic Influenza 1 million 0.07%[7] – 1889–1890 Worldwide
Epidemics and pandemics with at least 1 million de... (show quote)


"9 COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 3.4 million+ (reported)–
7.2 million (estimated) (as of May 2021)"

The number of deaths related to COVID-19 is skewed because, in the beginning, CDC ordered doctors to falsify ALL death certificate by attributing every death to COVID-19.

Reply
 
 
May 19, 2021 17:09:41   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Do you know how much is in each injection? You inhale more carcinogens with each breath.


I know there's enough in each jab to kill a person!!

You don't seem to realize that some in our government have been in the genocide business for many years.

Reply
May 21, 2021 12:00:23   #
peg w
 
I really think you have to look at SM 102 this way:
Vaccines have to be safe and effictive, and are tested by the FDA. If SM 102 was in a high enough dose to be harmful, the vaccine would not have been approved for use.
Also, about 40% of people vaccinated in the US have gotten Mederna vaccine. There haven't been any of the side affects noted.
So what is the problem?

Reply
May 21, 2021 12:20:40   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Do you know how much is in each injection? You inhale more carcinogens with each breath.


I know there's enough in the "jab" to kill you!!

Reply
May 21, 2021 12:54:03   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
peg w wrote:
I really think you have to look at SM 102 this way:
Vaccines have to be safe and effictive, and are tested by the FDA. If SM 102 was in a high enough dose to be harmful, the vaccine would not have been approved for use.
Also, about 40% of people vaccinated in the US have gotten Mederna vaccine. There haven't been any of the side affects noted.
So what is the problem?


The "vaccine" is still in the experimental stage. Most vaccines are tested over a period years!
The FDA works for Big Pharma. To my knowledge the FDA never approved these so-called "vaccines." All the COVID "vaccines" have nefarious side effects. And there's no warning on the box of the ingredients or its side effects.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.