rumitoid wrote:
Very nice and informative; you do have a flare for being clear and succinct, ginnyt. I would like to address this comment first: "So, I submit to you that if a person is truly following the laws or walking in the footsteps of Jesus, then we would remain in the dark on their charity and love toward their neighbors. If one is a keeper of the law, then loving others flow naturally and is not a point to brag about. One can not judge all people as not being able to always be altruistic. To use such a broad stroke for all of human kind is being very un-altruistic."
I agree and disagree with your above statement. For me, and the idea of grace put forth in the NT, "following the law" can never be altruistic: the very intent and effort necessary to do so makes altruism impossible. Why? True integrity of spirit is beyond intent and there is to be "no boast" in Christ: this is the crucial distinction between the Old and New Covenant. Being a "keeper of the law" cannot help but diminish or block the natural flow of God's love, for it is based on personal understanding, intent, and effort. This was the one and only thing that Jesus openly criticized as concerned the practice of the Chosen People.
Very nice and informative; you do have a flare for... (
show quote)
In response, I ask you just one question. If someone you care about or love unconditionally asks you to do something inconvenient or unpleasant, something you didn't feel like doing, you would do it, wouldn't you? It is a very shallow and meaningless kind of love if you aren't willing to do something inconvenient for the one you love. How much more so should we be willing to perform some occasionally inconvenient tasks that were set before us by our Creator, who assigned those tasks to us for our own good? Furthermore, my God knows everything, has complete understanding, knows my abilities and my faults. Would my God who is perfect, without fault, without malice toward me set me up to fail? Then He would never give me standards that are beyond my ability.
And I have to question your understanding, that of following the law "can not help but diminish or block the natural flow of God's love. " I submit from the Christian point of view the following:
The Messiah was prophesied in the Law. (Time out, for a better understanding of this word. For many Christians, there is a mistranslation and understanding of the word Messiah. To them the term "mashiach" is related to the Hebrew term "moshiah" (savior) because they sound similar, but the similarity is not as strong as it appears to one unfamiliar with Hebrew. The Hebrew word "mashiach" comes from the root Mem-Shin-Chet, which means to paint, smear, or annoint. The word "moshiah" comes from the root Yod-Shin-Ayin, which means to help or save. The only letter these roots have in common is Shin, the most common letter in the Hebrew language. The "m" sound at the beginning of the word moshiah (savior) is a common prefix used to turn a verb into a noun. For example, the verb tzavah (to command) becomes mitzvah (commandment). Saying that "mashiach" is related to "moshiah" is a bit like saying that ring is related to surfing because they both end in "ing.") Moses prophesied of a "prophet from among their brethren" being raised up and that he would be like unto Moses (Deut. 18: 18). The apostle Peter showed this prophecy was fulfilled in Christ (Acts 3: 22, 23). The Hebrew Scriptures prophesied of Messiahs birth, life, and death (Micah 5: 2; Isa. 53: 1-12). Jesus said of the Hebrew Scriptures, "
they are they which testify of me" (Jn. 5: 39). Therefore the birth of Jesus was part of the covenant with the *Hebrew nation. To go on, the mashiach will be a great political leader descended from King David (Jeremiah 23:5). The mashiach is often referred to as "mashiach ben David" (mashiach, son of David). He will be well-versed in Jewish law, and observant of its commandments (Isaiah 11:2-5). He will be a charismatic leader, inspiring others to follow his example. He will be a great military leader. He will be a great judge, who makes righteous decisions (Jeremiah 33:15). But above all, he will be a human being, not a god, demi-god or other supernatural being.
It is written that Jesus lived and died under the law. "But when the fullness of the time was come," Paul wrote, "God sent forth his Son, made of a woman,
made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law
" Again, this references the lost tribes of Israelites. (Gal. 4: 4, 5). The fact Messiah will be no accident. God has planned for the birth and introduction to the world (Dan. 2).
Also consider, in the NKJ version, Jesus recognized the authority of the Law. When asked "what shall I do to inherit eternal life"
Jesus replied, "What is written in the law? How readest thou?" (Lk. 10: 25, 26). When the man correctly answered by alluding to the Ten Commandments, Jesus said "Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live" (vs. 27, 28).
Jesus recognized the resident authority of the Hebrew scriptures when he quoted them to defeat the Tempter (Matt. 4, 7, 10, Deut. 8: 3; Ps. 91: 11, 12; Deut. 6: 16).
Christ perfectly kept the Law of Moses.
Jesus himself claimed to have been obedient to the law under which he lived, the Law of Moses (Jn. 8: 29, 55). In fact, the Israelites were unable to convict Jesus of any transgression of the law (Jn. 8: 46). It is affirmed in the New Testament that Jesus "did no sin" and "was without sin" (I Pet. 2: 22; Heb. 4: 15).
Christ taught others to keep the law. As seen, Jesus recognized the authority of the law in his life and taught others to keep the law (Lk. 10: 25-28).[b] Jesus instructed his disciples to obey the law (Matt. 23: 2, 3).
Christ defended the law and severely condemned those who perverted the Hebrew scripture (Mk. 7: 7-13; Matt. 23: 16-22).
In conclusion, God is perfect, just, loving, and knows all things. God, because of his love for his people, would never ask the impossible. I could argue the teachings of Jesus and to whom he came to teach, but I fear that would anger you and make you blindly hostile to engaging in further discussion with me. I do assure you, I have no intent to persuade you in your beliefs or convert you. Do not be jealous or overly concerned with the the Chosen People. God chose the Jewish nation because they were the lowliest of nations, and their success would be attributed to God's might rather than their own ability. Clearly, these are not the ideas of a people who think they are better than other nations.
I also send you back to the definition of altruism.
al·tru·ism
[ áltroo ìzzəm ]
1.selflessness: an attitude or way of behaving marked by unselfish concern for the welfare of others
2.belief in acting for others' good: the belief that acting for the benefit of others is right and good
Which part of the definition causes you to believe that altruism is not work? And what part says that it is not "based on personal understanding, intent, and effort"?