grazeem Loc: Arizona

It seems to me that If Mrs. Clinton were to run in 2016, she would be unbeatiable.

That's why Republicans are making such a fuss about the regretable deaths in Libia. It's all they have.

Other than Libia, her record as Secratary of State, is quite good.

If "LIFE" was really important to you, you wouldn't be making a fuss about allowing millions of Americans health care. Health care, that will save lives

But I don't remember much flap about the 4347 American lives lost, in Iraq, since the "Mission Accomplished" speach, that Bush made on 5/1/03. That's ten years, and still you are silent.

I don't hear a wild cry to investagate the lies of the Bush adminstration. I guess, in your eyes, some lies are more acceptable, should we say, than others.

In truth, you don't give a damn, about loss of life, or much else, for that matter, well guns maybe, as long as you can make a political point about it.


The lives of the poor, or of people that don't agree with you, have no value.

The only life worth loosing, is one that you can try to make political hay with.

Other than that, you really don't care.

Bert

Who is this Hillory your talking about?

The Dutchman

Bert, I think he meant thunder thighs hellory.

Bert

You're probably right. Thanks.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

I guess somebody needs to tell you that Hillary is very beatable especially after all the lying about Benghazi which she did more than a little of. She won't even be nominated if she and her leader lose in this one, and I am sure they will. Then it will be your turn to be fearful about the election of 2016.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

He isn't the best left leaning speller in the world but it has to be thunder thighs he is talking about. He was a bit wild in what he had to say but was saying it like a leaner with no control.

Dragnet

Remember your royal highness voted for the war resolution regarding Iraq.
Other than that, I know of nothing she has done positive for our country.

If she runs, she will probably win, and it will certainly not be for any accomplishment (we already have a president with no prior accomplishment -
still hasn't for that matter). She will win simply because most don't care she turned her back on 4 men in trouble, and care only about what our totally incompetent gov will give them.

By the way, President Bush would have sent help immediately to Benghazi.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

Were Democrat voters knowledgeable OR informed OR good citizens, Hillary wouldn't have a chance of winning. However, considering all democrat voters vote the way their handlers, AKA, the DNC, tell them how to vote, for whom, where, how many times, under what names, I see no reason for Republicans to attempt to tar her. She's already as tainted as one can get without going to prison - the RNC can't hurt her. If the DNC had a few decent humans in its coterie, THEY could hurt her - that's WHY they don't have decent humans in their midst. Hillary could teach Obama to lie even better than he does. She's a lot older and a lot more experienced at it.

The DNC's 2nd worse gift to America

Frank

Hello, I'm new here and I usually just read, but I felt I needed to respond. The one thing that has always amused me is the notion that President Bush lied. Democrats saw the same intelligence that he did and they agreed that Saddam had WMDs. The one mistake that Bush made was giving him (Saddam)30 days to comply, he should have given him about 2. Just how many WMDs or materials to make them were transported out of Iraq in that 30 days? My nephew was on the ground in Iraq during the initial invasion and he told me that there were thousands upon thousands of empty chemical drums spread all over the desert where they had been dumped so that the contents could evaporate. Chemical weapons are WMDs.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your nephew is quite right. I was glued to the TV all during that time. Initially, before MSM got the memo from the DNC (probably), it covered the convoy of tarp covered trucks hauling things to Syria, and it was touted at that time that it was WMD in those trucks, or at the very least chemicals necessary in the production of same. To have been the most effective, we should have bombed the devil out of Hussein's compounds September 12. Al Qaida had a training camp there(we may could have taken out dozens of them), and he was in the process of producing some dangerous weapons of warfare. No, it was no mistake for President Bush to go to Iraq - Congress, on the basis of several high rankinig democrats blessing and touting our going, readily approved going to Iraq. Additionally, the UN believed the reports as did the international communities.

The left did everything in their power to destroy Bush while he was running a war - and that is treason, or would have been had it been the Republicans doing what that Democrat Congress was doing. Bush didn't "lie".......some black preachers lied about Bush and it caught on and atrocities were committed amongst the left, and they will never regain any integrity - they only get worse.

I will never trust a democrat again - they are evil, and without souls.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

I can't agree with you about Democrats being so bad but any progressive Democrats are just what you said, IMO.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

As an unemployed, retired old man back in those days, I saw the same things on TV as tasmine describes. I also read, many times, about the Russian troops who came in to dismantle various weapons they had supplied Saddam. illegally, according to international law. Ah yes, they are having quite a time lying about what took place back then.

My problem about TV is that I couldn't even watch Fox back then and had to depend on CNN where they told a story in the morning and then never again all day if it looked like anything that Bush might use to make himself look good.

grazeem Loc: Arizona

Well, you guys all seem to have your heads in your ass.

Of course Bush lied, Cheney admitted to it. He said they used the WMD thing , because it would be easier to sell to Congress.

As to Hill"A"ry running, who would you run aginst her? You guys are like a two headed dog, with the "RINO's" as you call them, being eaten up by the extremeist's.

You will beat each other up, for 6 months, and then run someone like Rand Paul, who will get 42% of the vote.

I am thrilled to see all the infighting, keep it up boys, keep it up.

As to health care:

Old roy wrote:

"Is there a chance that the millions who lose their health care because employers drop their coverage because it cost them so much will be hurt more than those who are on Medicaid now but will get some cheap insurance from Obamacare. Do you not understand that what you people keep howling about being health care is nothing but health insurance? I wish you could understand that part."

Of course I understand it, what you don't seem to understand, mostly because you listen to "FOX so called News" all the time is, that this is way of broadening the base, by including more people in it, thus lowering the cost.

The cost of insuring everyone, regardless of "preexisting condition" is $69 a year. BECAUSE EVERYONE IS PAYING THE $69.

My health care costs me $1400 a month, for the two of us. I ran onto some retired milataty guy, bitching that his just went up to $600 a year, poor guy.

RETW Loc: Washington

Rand Paul is right as rain on this when he said Clinton is responsible. Just realizing what Clinton said in reference to what does it mater. Well Miz Clinton, you may not feel that four peoples life mater, But I do, as well as most of the country's population. Also, if you think this will blow over soon, think again. The truth will win out here. And you were the Secretary at the time of this attack, so that makes you responsible. And least we forget, do you not answer directly to the president? Now that's what I learned in school back in the early forty's. And in all this time it has not changed. So as I see this, you and the President are responsible for the loss of these four brave Americans. How you two fools can even sleep at night is a wonder. And to even entertain the idea, that some one would vote for you, and put you back in a position of responsibility is just to horrible to contemplate. And you want to have her run for the office of the president. I ask you, what are you thinking? It is clear you have no regard for the thoughts or opinions of the folks that write here. Because of this you must know . No reasonable person would, or could take your comments with even a modicum of truth. You have every right to write , and respond as any of us. But be for warned, you have so far proven to be imbecilic by far, and a fool at best.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Love you, Roy, but you must know some democrats I'm not familiar with. I can't point to one decent one, not in politics. Every one of them will vote party line every time, and their constituents continue voting for them even after disastrous votes. That's pretty bad - it demonstrates no character except weak ones. Even when they vote for something that could be considered "good", their motives are for the wrong reasons. Tell me the name of one who doesn't vote "progressive". I need to know about at least one with character and integrity.