This election was so corupt that even a young man and his home computer can show it.
We’ll be waiting a long time to get his last question answered: “if anyone’s able to make sense of these numbers without saying it’s fraud, please let me know in the comments”.
Um, anyone who has ever mailed anything through the US mail knows it is impossible that that many letters were mailed out, completed and return mailed and received the same day
But that isn’t all. Thousands were received back from the government before they were mailed out.
But somehow that’s not considered evidence to the leftist minions.
This explains why those same minions still think Schiff did have evidence of Russian collusion: because to them, whatever they are told to believe is settled fact.
That is who we conservatives are “arguing” against in trying to get them to wake up and smell the coffee.
Very impressive, apparently.
TommyRadd wrote:
We’ll be waiting a long time to get his last question answered: “if anyone’s able to make sense of these numbers without saying it’s fraud, please let me know in the comments”.
Um, anyone who has ever mailed anything through the US mail knows it is impossible that that many letters were mailed out, completed and return mailed and received the same day
But that isn’t all. Thousands were received back from the government before they were mailed out.
But somehow that’s not considered evidence to the leftist minions.
This explains why those same minions still think Schiff did have evidence of Russian collusion: because to them, whatever they are told to believe is settled fact.
That is who we conservatives are “arguing” against in trying to get them to wake up and smell the coffee.
We’ll be waiting a long time to get his last quest... (
show quote)
Do you also remember how much information trump and his minions blocked schiff,from getting and the testimonys they never got. That's not propaganda.so yes liberals still do believe there was Russian collusion.
roy wrote:
Do you also remember how much information trump and his minions blocked schiff,from getting and the testimonys they never got. That's not propaganda.so yes liberals still do believe there was Russian collusion.
Can you answer the young man’s question:
“if anyone’s able to make sense of these numbers without saying it’s fraud, please let me know in the comments”.
These are the kinds of people Trump had to deal with. They don’t deserve encouragement.
roy wrote:
Do you also remember how much information trump and his minions blocked schiff,from getting and the testimonys they never got. That's not propaganda.so yes liberals still do believe there was Russian collusion.
Answer the young man's question instead of trying to divert from it.
I took mine to the post office an hour after I got it
Lonewolf wrote:
I took mine to the post office an hour after I got it
Did you also receive it before they sent it?
roy wrote:
Do you also remember how much information trump and his minions blocked schiff,from getting and the testimonys they never got. That's not propaganda.so yes liberals still do believe there was Russian collusion.
Just curious, have you ever heard of the 5th amendment? It is based on the principle that no one can be coerced to testify against themselves.
It’s a teal thing.
Another question: have you ever heard of slander or false accusations?
It’s also a real thing.
Schiff swore for years under oath that he had proof against Trump, but in the end, provided none. That’s slander.
I’ll defend Trump for not willingly incriminating himself, while you defend Schiff and company for slander.
No moral equivalence here, folks.
Lonewolf wrote:
I took mine to the post office an hour after I got it
Yeah, and I suppose it was returned back to the government...........fifteens minutes later.......through the mail?
I didn't know that the Post Office had next minute mail.
I've heard of next day mail, which costs extra and frankly, every time I paid extra for it, I didn't get it the next day.
But here it was accomplished, about 11,000 times and that's only one third of the data set, through the mail!
TommyRadd wrote:
Did you also receive it before they sent it?
I've been getting my ballot automatically in the mail for 25± years.
kemmer wrote:
I've been getting my ballot automatically in the mail for 25± years.
I received an invitation for a mail-in ballot, returned it marked yes send ballot.
Still waiting.
Voter registration was received at this address 4 years ago.
Planed on voting at the polls anyway and no problem, vote accepted.
Anybody standing behind this fraud is aiding and abetting.
And is unAmerican
TommyRadd wrote:
Just curious, have you ever heard of the 5th amendment? It is based on the principle that no one can be coerced to testify against themselves.
It’s a teal thing.
Another question: have you ever heard of slander or false accusations?
It’s also a real thing.
Schiff swore for years under oath that he had proof against Trump, but in the end, provided none. That’s slander.
I’ll defend Trump for not willingly incriminating himself, while you defend Schiff and company for slander.
No moral equivalence here, folks.
Just curious, have you ever heard of the 5th amend... (
show quote)
Well trump not only blocked information on himself,but others on his team.He blocked many from testifying.So how was supposed to get to the whole truth,so you can't truthfully say Schiff slandered anybody ,and you can't say he lied,way I look at it it's still ongoing investigation.
roy wrote:
Well trump not only blocked information on himself,but others on his team.He blocked many from testifying.So how was supposed to get to the whole truth,so you can't truthfully say Schiff slandered anybody ,and you can't say he lied,way I look at it it's still ongoing investigation.
It was the prosecutions responsibility to prove guilt. It was not their responsibility to go hunting for evidence.
There is no way you will convince me that if you had enemies that were fabricating a hoax against you (which evidence has shown that Hillary commissioned and paid for the manufacture of the hoax) that you would volunteer to supply them information.
Like I said, I’ll defend Trump for not wanting to testify against himself while you defend Schiff for slander.
What part of Schiff claiming over and over that “they already had all the evidence they needed” don’t you comprehend?
If someone was lying and slandering you and making up a story against you, and they adamantly claimed they already had enough evidence against you, and yet still demanded you testify against yourself (against what you knew to be a lie) you would be an idiot to supply them anything.
I shudder that I have to explain this to a voting American.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.