PeterS wrote:
And does she use religion in her decisions? Say a case to overturn RvW come up. Does she vote to take away a woman's right to control her body based on a none religious reason? What is it?
If women have the right to control their bodies, wouldn't that include taking steps to avoid getting pregnant?
Since 85% of the people on this earth are, to one degree or other, religious, how can religion not be relevant? A person's beliefs and faith in something greater than herself informs her world view, so how can she be forced to abandon her faith whether or not she is in public office?
Our founders certainly did not abandon their faith in God when they declared independence from a tyrannical king and established a new nation.
In seeking answers to the age old questions - Origin, Meaning, Morality, and Destiny - five fields of study must be equally and honestly applied, ignore one and the search for answers to these questions will lead nowhere.
Metaphysics - the branch of philosophy that deals with first principles, abstract concepts, such as being, knowing, substance, cause, identity, time and space.
Epistemology - the theory of knowledge with regard to its methods, validity, and scope, the investigation of what distinguishes justified belief from opinion.
Ethics - the branch of knowledge that deals with moral principles.
Anthropology the study of human societies and cultures and their development, (the study of human biological and physiological characteristics and their evolution.
Theology - the study of God and religious beliefs and theories when systematically developed.
Secularization, OTH, is the process by which religious ideas, institutions and interpretations have lost their social significance. You cannot invoke the notion of God in arguing for a sense of morality. In a secular world view, there is no ontic referent with which to establish moral principles.
.