First debate: Trump 6 - Biden 4: After watching the first debate between the President and the Democratic candidate, I can say that nothing has changed in relation to the existing...

Alber

After watching the first debate between the President and the Democratic candidate, I can say that nothing has changed in relation to the existing opinion. From a physical point of view, the President looks in better shape than his opponent, Biden is discolored, lifeless, as if mummified; as for the development of the debate, at times it seemed that the moderator was inclined towards the applicant, when he saw fit to ask the President a question about paying his taxes, without asking the applicant a question about his son's relationship with the Ukrainian company Burisma, to match the intention.
It should be noted that the President could not contain his temper and interrupted his opponent on many occasions when Biden said things that deviated from the truth or were diatribes; and I have the impression that the debate was not well organized, since a space for reply should be allowed, which would avoid these interruptions. Occasionally, I got the impression that the moderator was ending a debate on an issue, after Biden delivered a diatribe that remained on the air.
The moderator must be someone impartial, but impartiality in politics is difficult; therefore, a method must be found to perform this function. I think that the contestants should be informed of the issues to be discussed; and that these be on specific government matters, so that each one explains what their actions on that matter would be if they were to hold the presidency. I believe that a debate between presidential candidates is not a brawl between two bullies.
Another issue to take into consideration is that the contestants must demonstrate that they are not being helped to answer the questions and it would be good to have the opponents' ears checked before the start of the debate by physicians trusted by the contestants, as that it is known that there are tiny hearing aids that can receive information broadcast from a distance, since at times Biden gave the impression that he was reading the propaganda that the Democratic Party has developed and not presenting a personal concept.
The President said many real things, but if he had said them within an order it would have been much better, it would be good if when the floor was given, there was some kind of visible signal that recorded the time, so that the contestants could stick to it; and that within that time the speaker could not be interrupted, neither by the opponent nor by the moderator.
Although the President seemed aggressive, in truth he was moderate and did not treat his opponent badly, he only defended himself, especially when it came to racism, as he could have mentioned the accusation that Biden’s running mate, Kamala Harris, made against him, giving rise to understanding the lack of principles of the alliance between them.
Trump could have said that BLM is a Marxist organization equating it to Antifa. That he supports Blexit and African-Americans who are in favor of the US, wanting the prefix “African” to be eliminated to simply call them what they are: Americans, without distinction of origin, race or color, avoiding the politically “correct” racist identity that has been imposed on them, by those who claim to be their defenders, being that prefix divisive and discriminatory. That he is against the hatred that leads to the riots that have been produced by the BLM protests, telling black people clearly, that he is on the side of those who respect law and order, considering role models men like Dr. Ben Carson or Dr. Thomas Sowell and women like Candace Owens or Ann Coulter, regardless of the opposition of those who dedicate themselves to stealing, destroying and assassinating, to whom the law will be duly enforced for their crimes.
In relation to the economy, the President recalled how Obama said that there would be occupations and jobs that would never return; and how he brought them back. For his part, Biden stuck to the fairy tale of his environmental proposal and according to him; he does not support but takes as a framework the Green New Deal; and Trump said about this, that is not realistic, since it would take 100 trillion, which the country does not have; although he forgot to say that this policy aims to enrich its promoters, as is the case with Al Gore, who has invested heavily in companies related to renewable energy.
In summary, although it could have been better, I estimate that out of 10 points, 6 can be given to Trump and 4 to Biden; and that the President should put aside the PC and call things by their names, since that is what the patriotic American people want, which is the silent majority; and that's why they chose him. Besides, what does the tiger care about one more line, anyway the media will say everything they can against him. Let's wait for the next debate.

Smedley_buzkill

Alber wrote:

After watching the first debate between the President and the Democratic candidate, I can say that nothing has changed in relation to the existing opinion. From a physical point of view, the President looks in better shape than his opponent, Biden is discolored, lifeless, as if mummified; as for the development of the debate, at times it seemed that the moderator was inclined towards the applicant, when he saw fit to ask the President a question about paying his taxes, without asking the applicant a question about his son's relationship with the Ukrainian company Burisma, to match the intention.
It should be noted that the President could not contain his temper and interrupted his opponent on many occasions when Biden said things that deviated from the truth or were diatribes; and I have the impression that the debate was not well organized, since a space for reply should be allowed, which would avoid these interruptions. Occasionally, I got the impression that the moderator was ending a debate on an issue, after Biden delivered a diatribe that remained on the air.
The moderator must be someone impartial, but impartiality in politics is difficult; therefore, a method must be found to perform this function. I think that the contestants should be informed of the issues to be discussed; and that these be on specific government matters, so that each one explains what their actions on that matter would be if they were to hold the presidency. I believe that a debate between presidential candidates is not a brawl between two bullies.
Another issue to take into consideration is that the contestants must demonstrate that they are not being helped to answer the questions and it would be good to have the opponents' ears checked before the start of the debate by physicians trusted by the contestants, as that it is known that there are tiny hearing aids that can receive information broadcast from a distance, since at times Biden gave the impression that he was reading the propaganda that the Democratic Party has developed and not presenting a personal concept.
The President said many real things, but if he had said them within an order it would have been much better, it would be good if when the floor was given, there was some kind of visible signal that recorded the time, so that the contestants could stick to it; and that within that time the speaker could not be interrupted, neither by the opponent nor by the moderator.
Although the President seemed aggressive, in truth he was moderate and did not treat his opponent badly, he only defended himself, especially when it came to racism, as he could have mentioned the accusation that Biden’s running mate, Kamala Harris, made against him, giving rise to understanding the lack of principles of the alliance between them.
Trump could have said that BLM is a Marxist organization equating it to Antifa. That he supports Blexit and African-Americans who are in favor of the US, wanting the prefix “African” to be eliminated to simply call them what they are: Americans, without distinction of origin, race or color, avoiding the politically “correct” racist identity that has been imposed on them, by those who claim to be their defenders, being that prefix divisive and discriminatory. That he is against the hatred that leads to the riots that have been produced by the BLM protests, telling black people clearly, that he is on the side of those who respect law and order, considering role models men like Dr. Ben Carson or Dr. Thomas Sowell and women like Candace Owens or Ann Coulter, regardless of the opposition of those who dedicate themselves to stealing, destroying and assassinating, to whom the law will be duly enforced for their crimes.
In relation to the economy, the President recalled how Obama said that there would be occupations and jobs that would never return; and how he brought them back. For his part, Biden stuck to the fairy tale of his environmental proposal and according to him; he does not support but takes as a framework the Green New Deal; and Trump said about this, that is not realistic, since it would take 100 trillion, which the country does not have; although he forgot to say that this policy aims to enrich its promoters, as is the case with Al Gore, who has invested heavily in companies related to renewable energy.
In summary, although it could have been better, I estimate that out of 10 points, 6 can be given to Trump and 4 to Biden; and that the President should put aside the PC and call things by their names, since that is what the patriotic American people want, which is the silent majority; and that's why they chose him. Besides, what does the tiger care about one more line, anyway the media will say everything they can against him. Let's wait for the next debate.

After watching the first debate between the Presid... (show quote)

Biden's refusal to take a drug test and his last minute refusal to be checked for earpieces should tell people all they need to know. The president agreed to both of these stipulations and did not renege.

roy

Smedley_buzkill wrote:

Biden's refusal to take a drug test and his last minute refusal to be checked for earpieces should tell people all they need to know. The president agreed to both of these stipulations and did not renege.

Prove it just more bullshit from the right,.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Alber wrote:

After watching the first debate between the President and the Democratic candidate, I can say that nothing has changed in relation to the existing opinion. From a physical point of view, the President looks in better shape than his opponent, Biden is discolored, lifeless, as if mummified; as for the development of the debate, at times it seemed that the moderator was inclined towards the applicant, when he saw fit to ask the President a question about paying his taxes, without asking the applicant a question about his son's relationship with the Ukrainian company Burisma, to match the intention.
It should be noted that the President could not contain his temper and interrupted his opponent on many occasions when Biden said things that deviated from the truth or were diatribes; and I have the impression that the debate was not well organized, since a space for reply should be allowed, which would avoid these interruptions. Occasionally, I got the impression that the moderator was ending a debate on an issue, after Biden delivered a diatribe that remained on the air.
The moderator must be someone impartial, but impartiality in politics is difficult; therefore, a method must be found to perform this function. I think that the contestants should be informed of the issues to be discussed; and that these be on specific government matters, so that each one explains what their actions on that matter would be if they were to hold the presidency. I believe that a debate between presidential candidates is not a brawl between two bullies.
Another issue to take into consideration is that the contestants must demonstrate that they are not being helped to answer the questions and it would be good to have the opponents' ears checked before the start of the debate by physicians trusted by the contestants, as that it is known that there are tiny hearing aids that can receive information broadcast from a distance, since at times Biden gave the impression that he was reading the propaganda that the Democratic Party has developed and not presenting a personal concept.
The President said many real things, but if he had said them within an order it would have been much better, it would be good if when the floor was given, there was some kind of visible signal that recorded the time, so that the contestants could stick to it; and that within that time the speaker could not be interrupted, neither by the opponent nor by the moderator.
Although the President seemed aggressive, in truth he was moderate and did not treat his opponent badly, he only defended himself, especially when it came to racism, as he could have mentioned the accusation that Biden’s running mate, Kamala Harris, made against him, giving rise to understanding the lack of principles of the alliance between them.
Trump could have said that BLM is a Marxist organization equating it to Antifa. That he supports Blexit and African-Americans who are in favor of the US, wanting the prefix “African” to be eliminated to simply call them what they are: Americans, without distinction of origin, race or color, avoiding the politically “correct” racist identity that has been imposed on them, by those who claim to be their defenders, being that prefix divisive and discriminatory. That he is against the hatred that leads to the riots that have been produced by the BLM protests, telling black people clearly, that he is on the side of those who respect law and order, considering role models men like Dr. Ben Carson or Dr. Thomas Sowell and women like Candace Owens or Ann Coulter, regardless of the opposition of those who dedicate themselves to stealing, destroying and assassinating, to whom the law will be duly enforced for their crimes.
In relation to the economy, the President recalled how Obama said that there would be occupations and jobs that would never return; and how he brought them back. For his part, Biden stuck to the fairy tale of his environmental proposal and according to him; he does not support but takes as a framework the Green New Deal; and Trump said about this, that is not realistic, since it would take 100 trillion, which the country does not have; although he forgot to say that this policy aims to enrich its promoters, as is the case with Al Gore, who has invested heavily in companies related to renewable energy.
In summary, although it could have been better, I estimate that out of 10 points, 6 can be given to Trump and 4 to Biden; and that the President should put aside the PC and call things by their names, since that is what the patriotic American people want, which is the silent majority; and that's why they chose him. Besides, what does the tiger care about one more line, anyway the media will say everything they can against him. Let's wait for the next debate.

After watching the first debate between the Presid... (show quote)

Load of bull hockey. Trump 0, Biden 0.

roy

Smedley_buzkill wrote:

Biden's refusal to take a drug test and his last minute refusal to be checked for earpieces should tell people all they need to know. The president agreed to both of these stipulations and did not renege.

Did trump take a drug test or was he checked for ear pieces.So make up more bs to make up for an idiot

woodguru

Smedley_buzkill wrote:

Biden's refusal to take a drug test and his last minute refusal to be checked for earpieces should tell people all they need to know. The president agreed to both of these stipulations and did not renege.

This call to take a drug test was a serious thing? I thought it was more ridiculous trump "tweets" flitting through trumps head. Perhaps trump should strap into a lie detector, that's as serious a request as trump's drug test is. Who cares if either man is whiffing drugs, it's not like trump is a stranger to cocaine...at least he seems to have that under control as he isn't cocaine drain sniffing every six seconds like he did during the last debates he did.

What do you mean trump agreed to both and didn't renege, he didn't submit to either as neither was serious.

vernon

woodguru wrote:

This call to take a drug test was a serious thing?... (show quote)

He dam sure did and he passed both. As far as your accusation that trump does drugs is a dam lie and he doesn't drink alcohol .Now I do know a few things about Trump and he doesn't do either.
just another lie you must be shooting for a record.

Tug484

Smedley_buzkill wrote:

Biden's refusal to take a drug test and his last minute refusal to be checked for earpieces should tell people all they need to know. The president agreed to both of these stipulations and did not renege.

Agreed. Not answering the packing the court question was also an answer.
He intends to pack the court

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Alber wrote:

After watching the first debate between the President and the Democratic candidate, I can say that nothing has changed in relation to the existing opinion. From a physical point of view, the President looks in better shape than his opponent, Biden is discolored, lifeless, as if mummified; as for the development of the debate, at times it seemed that the moderator was inclined towards the applicant, when he saw fit to ask the President a question about paying his taxes, without asking the applicant a question about his son's relationship with the Ukrainian company Burisma, to match the intention.
It should be noted that the President could not contain his temper and interrupted his opponent on many occasions when Biden said things that deviated from the truth or were diatribes; and I have the impression that the debate was not well organized, since a space for reply should be allowed, which would avoid these interruptions. Occasionally, I got the impression that the moderator was ending a debate on an issue, after Biden delivered a diatribe that remained on the air.
The moderator must be someone impartial, but impartiality in politics is difficult; therefore, a method must be found to perform this function. I think that the contestants should be informed of the issues to be discussed; and that these be on specific government matters, so that each one explains what their actions on that matter would be if they were to hold the presidency. I believe that a debate between presidential candidates is not a brawl between two bullies.
Another issue to take into consideration is that the contestants must demonstrate that they are not being helped to answer the questions and it would be good to have the opponents' ears checked before the start of the debate by physicians trusted by the contestants, as that it is known that there are tiny hearing aids that can receive information broadcast from a distance, since at times Biden gave the impression that he was reading the propaganda that the Democratic Party has developed and not presenting a personal concept.
The President said many real things, but if he had said them within an order it would have been much better, it would be good if when the floor was given, there was some kind of visible signal that recorded the time, so that the contestants could stick to it; and that within that time the speaker could not be interrupted, neither by the opponent nor by the moderator.
Although the President seemed aggressive, in truth he was moderate and did not treat his opponent badly, he only defended himself, especially when it came to racism, as he could have mentioned the accusation that Biden’s running mate, Kamala Harris, made against him, giving rise to understanding the lack of principles of the alliance between them.
Trump could have said that BLM is a Marxist organization equating it to Antifa. That he supports Blexit and African-Americans who are in favor of the US, wanting the prefix “African” to be eliminated to simply call them what they are: Americans, without distinction of origin, race or color, avoiding the politically “correct” racist identity that has been imposed on them, by those who claim to be their defenders, being that prefix divisive and discriminatory. That he is against the hatred that leads to the riots that have been produced by the BLM protests, telling black people clearly, that he is on the side of those who respect law and order, considering role models men like Dr. Ben Carson or Dr. Thomas Sowell and women like Candace Owens or Ann Coulter, regardless of the opposition of those who dedicate themselves to stealing, destroying and assassinating, to whom the law will be duly enforced for their crimes.
In relation to the economy, the President recalled how Obama said that there would be occupations and jobs that would never return; and how he brought them back. For his part, Biden stuck to the fairy tale of his environmental proposal and according to him; he does not support but takes as a framework the Green New Deal; and Trump said about this, that is not realistic, since it would take 100 trillion, which the country does not have; although he forgot to say that this policy aims to enrich its promoters, as is the case with Al Gore, who has invested heavily in companies related to renewable energy.
In summary, although it could have been better, I estimate that out of 10 points, 6 can be given to Trump and 4 to Biden; and that the President should put aside the PC and call things by their names, since that is what the patriotic American people want, which is the silent majority; and that's why they chose him. Besides, what does the tiger care about one more line, anyway the media will say everything they can against him. Let's wait for the next debate.

After watching the first debate between the Presid... (show quote)

The Green New Deal is nothing new. Would it surprise you that it is centuries old? It comes from Lenin. And even AOC has admitted that it has nothing to do with gerbil warming, just socialism power. Other than that I agree with everything.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

woodguru wrote:

This call to take a drug test was a serious thing?... (show quote)

Trump has said many times he'd never take drugs or drink, he doesn't want to be like his dead brother. So you might want to change your propaganda.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Smedley_buzkill wrote:

Biden's refusal to take a drug test and his last minute refusal to be checked for earpieces should tell people all they need to know. The president agreed to both of these stipulations and did not renege.

And then the next day I saw Biden's earpiece. I wondered why he was so what would you call it wired? Like he was on speed. Some performance enhancement drug, not Viagra this was for his big head.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

roy wrote:

Did trump take a drug test or was he checked for ear pieces.So make up more bs to make up for an idiot

Tested and was checked. Negative each time.