bmac32 Loc: West Florida

President Trump received his third 2020 Nobel Peace Prize nomination in September, this time from a group of Australian law professors.

“What he has done with the Trump Doctrine is that he has decided he would no longer have America involved in endless wars, wars which achieve nothing but the killing of thousands of young Americans and enormous debts imposed on America," Australian legal scholar David Flint told Sky News Australia on Sunday. "He's reducing America's tendency to get involved in any and every war."

Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia

He should get them, he earned them!
Not like Obama, he didn’t deserve it!

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

Couldn't figure out why Obama got one in the first place. The media was making false claims that Trump would get us into wars so he getting awards for not getting the US into wars.

bahmer

Amen and Amen

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

Flint is also a salesman of pawn (Babylon Blue) anything for a quick buck, but I've watched the interview you refer too and think he at least got one thing right which is the one you mentioned "Trump is reducing American's tendency to get involved in any and every war".

In that interview on Sky he's tapping Trump to be a winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, the Prize itself is like Flints ideas on Constitutional Monarchy anachronistic.

There is other famous people like Flint who are much better placed to represent the incompatibility of our era with past events because unlike Flint their honest about their presumptions, take for example Ali Weiwei, the guy who designed the "Bird's Nest Stadium" for the 2008 Beijing Olympics now living permanently in Britain. He regrets China's place in our overall economic and political aspirations but believes nothing can be done to change it.

Probably Weiwei is right unlike Flint in his assumptions, the difference between his outspokenness and Flint's point of view, - which is irrelevant, - is that the US not wanting to get involved in future endless war is now politically bipartisan but a One World Policy is solely Biden's donkey.

Actually the only groups who want an endless war scenario are Zionists, NSA pundits and arms manufacturers, that's how they make their living, but Chin's rise is subject to a ONE world Policy which is not necessarily the way to go and Trump has offered an alternative, I just wish Australia was on the China team.