I stand correct and thank you for pointing out that we still can not bridge our differences, and that at least one of us will be in consistent disagreement with the other.
Contrary to your statement, I do not hold Christians to any standards. For many reasons. In regards to my post, Modern day Christians have incorporated many of the beliefs of the Canaanites. Let me explain, I did much research into the Modern Day Christians and I found a consistent list of new interpretations of the Bible. Allow me to list:
The Lord's church includes all people who live a good life according to their own religious beliefs. All people can go to heaven as long as they do what they believe is right in the sight of their God.
People should be free to find their own spiritual path, and must not be forced to believe anything or to do anything any church teaches against their will. People should compel themselves to not do hurtful things and to love and do good to others. Individual spiritual growth and freedom go hand in hand.
Spiritual rebirth is a process. The path to spiritual life is one of spiritual progress, not spiritual perfection. Faith, and a life according to one's faith, is a dynamic process of change and growth. Individuals who are growing in the Lord continue to grow forever.
The Bible is the Word of God and can be read on many different levels. There is a deeper symbolic meaning to the stories in the Bible which teaches individuals about their own spiritual lives. Swedenborg calls this deeper meaning the internal sense. For more information about this, read The Language of Parable.
Life after death is real, and the details about that life have been explained in the teaching of Emanuel Swedenborg's book Heaven and Hell. All people who die wake up safe in the afterlife. Those who have made their life heavenly in this world find themselves in a heavenly way of life in the next. Those who have chosen to make their life a hell in this world find this reality waiting for them in the next. People freely choose their eternal destiny. For an introduction to the afterlife, see Life After Death, and to see the similarities between what Swedenborg said about the life after death, and what people are saying today, read Swedenborg and the Near-Death Experience.
The love in marriage is a special gift from the Lord. When spiritual principles are applied not only to one's spiritual growth, but also to the marriage relationship, troubled times can be overcome, and that marriage will grow in friendship, mutual support, and happiness. Genuine marriage does not end with death, but continues to eternity. Read Marriage Love, which describes the blessings of marriage and how they are achieved, and also read Together as One, which shows how marriage and other teachings of the New Church are related and work together as one. This incorporates nontraditional marriages such as between the same sex.
The second coming of Christ does not mean the destruction of all of creation and a fierce judgment on humankind. The second coming is taking place right now, in a new understanding of Jesus Christ, as revealed in the teachings of the Church, and brought to being in our individual and collective lives. This coming of the Lord is the dawn of a new age of genuine Christianity.
Indeed Christianity has gone through many changes, modernization of texts, and are more aware of personal feelings and what is politically correct. I could bore you with the history of your religion, but you are a learned individual who has extensive knowledge of scripture and therefore have an in-depth understanding of the changes. Suffice to say, the faith has worn many robes and adopted the philosophies of informed scholars for more than a thousand years. Among those accepted adaptations are some non-Christian beliefs and assumptions.
I do not think that you were arguing that Cain was the first human to turn his back on God's laws. And I do not think that you were implying that Cain did not established his own religion which morphed into worship of idols, child sacrifice in the name of EL, that is Baal.
I guess your main point is that Christians sin and they atone (ask forgiveness) and then repeat the sin and atone and do it again and again and God will always forgive them because Christians are only human and their lapse or vacillation of following the teaching and not following is not only expected, but is forgiven. Is this what I should have gotten from your comment? If not, please make your response more simplified and resubmit. However, if I read and understand your response correctly, then how do you respond to the following:
Hebrews 10:26-27 ESV :For if we go on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful expectation of judgment, and a fury of fire that will consume the adversaries."
2 Peter 2:20-22 ESV "For if, after they have escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the last state has become worse for them than the first. For it would have been better for them never to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment delivered to them.
Romans 6:12 ESV "Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, to make you obey its passions."
John 14:15 ESV "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. "
There are others, but I think you get the drift.
That was not the point of my post. The point I was trying to make is the inclusion of religions and faiths that are not Christ Like. That modern day Christians are actually incorporating into their Christian lives pagan thought and beliefs. Therefore, I agreed with you that Modern Day Christianity is a stumbling block to salvation and Christ. No more than that. No self righteousness, no assertion of deliberate misdoings on the part of anyone. Only generalized information about religion and I expounded on some traits as I see happening on this forum. Not an attack, not a put down, just a point of consideration.
I had expected that my drawing a parallel between Christians and Canaanites would have drawn some discussion with those that are more scholarly than I pointing out the error in my post. Instead, my post was received by you in a different manner. It is admirable of you to defend Christians that fall prey to angered comments, but again that was not the focal point of my post.
rumitoid wrote:
Perhaps we do agree and perhaps not.
Ginnyt said: "He was the first advocate of self-esteem, pride, and self-assertion. Anger and hard words, insults are the way of Cain and his religion. The attitude that no one will walk over or besmirch imagined honor. When we respond to another that they are vile, worthy of contempt, horrid, stupid, a wing nut, or an asshole; we are following the practice of Cainnot a follower of Christ but the first to be cursed by God."
True followers of Christ, good and decent people the vast majority of the time, do all the things you listed above. They have a serious condition: it is called human. Although what you listed is hardly recommended behavior for a "follower of Christ," of course none of it is an unknown in their life. People make mistakes. Forgiveness is there for an obvious reason.
A true follower of Christ may not easily fall into the behavior you listed, yet they are not immune. To hold a Christian beyond a standard one accepts for him- or herself to consistently live by is hypocrisy. Say a Christian, upright and true in every way for many years to Christ, loses in their advanced years their closest and longest and dearest friend from the age of five--and then is ruthlessly attacked not only personally but against their family and friends. Their game may be off. It is still wrong in acting unkindly or cruelly, in spirit no excuse, yet they are emotional vulnerable--as a human--and not perfect in their response.
Perhaps we do agree and perhaps not. br br Ginnyt... (
show quote)