One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out topic: Rough south of the border
Main
1st Amendment, right to assembly, right to petition ! Redress of Grievances
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jul 7, 2014 11:14:53   #
Sicilianthing
 
In this is the Redress of Grievances...
For those of you who still believe in a PEACEFUL Solution for Re Instating our Constitutional LAWS...

Problem is, when it's submitted and Congress, GOWNCLOWNS don't take action on it... what happens ?
I can only imagine what comes next... can you?

Reply
Jul 7, 2014 11:24:38   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
There are only 2 things we should ever go to war over--Defend the homeland against invasion, or defend the Bill of Rights. Look what has been happening since the false flag of 9/11.



Reply
Jul 7, 2014 12:46:23   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
buffalo wrote:
There are only 2 things we should ever go to war over--Defend the homeland against invasion, or defend the Bill of Rights. Look what has been happening since the false flag of 9/11.


Neither of the two big political parties have any interest in the bill of rights, as it delineates the rights of the average American. They are only concerned with gaining power, power to protect THEIR rights ( delusionally perceived rights ) and the rights of their financial backers. Expecting constitutionally sound behavior from them is also a delusional expectation.

Reply
 
 
Jul 7, 2014 12:49:25   #
Sicilianthing
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Neither of the two big political parties have any interest in the bill of rights, as it delineates the rights of the average American. They are only concerned with gaining power, power to protect THEIR rights ( delusionally perceived rights ) and the rights of their financial backers. Expecting constitutionally sound behavior from them is also a delusional expectation.


Yep so you see my point about a peaceful resolution, ha ?

Reply
Jul 7, 2014 13:12:44   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
Yep so you see my point about a peaceful resolution, ha ?


It would take voting the old guard out, which would mean that staunch Repubs and Dems need to take a long, hard look at what they're voting for - and do different. I don't think the American people, as a whole, give a shit anymore.

Reply
Jul 7, 2014 13:25:07   #
Olden McGroen Loc: Texas
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
In this is the Redress of Grievances...
For those of you who still believe in a PEACEFUL Solution for Re Instating our Constitutional LAWS...

Problem is, when it's submitted and Congress, GOWNCLOWNS don't take action on it... what happens ?
I can only imagine what comes next... can you?


=====================================

If you are inferring the next step is to take up arms (as in the Founders' days) then I would say that it's way too early for that. It could happen some day, but things will have to get far worse than they are now for people to actually have the stones to do that. Primarily, because they know it would be a losing venture. Now, I realize that the patriots of the 1770's took up arms against the most powerful nation in the world at the time. However, England was considered invincible due to their superior navy. On land, outside of their numbers and well-trained army, the colonists had fairly equal firepower. And in many cases, better longrifles. That's not the case today. The fed gov't, local and state gov'ts (which also includes police/sheriff) far outgun the average citizen. And not just outgunned, but out-ammoed. Not to mention other superior tactical and technical advantages. So, like I said, things would have to be incredibly horrid for the citizenry to take up arms against such small odds. We're nowhere near that right now.

Reply
Jul 7, 2014 14:10:38   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Neither of the two big political parties have any interest in the bill of rights, as it delineates the rights of the average American. They are only concerned with gaining power, power to protect THEIR rights ( delusionally perceived rights ) and the rights of their financial backers. Expecting constitutionally sound behavior from them is also a delusional expectation.


The "WE" I am referring to is neither arm of the corporate party(dimwits or repulsives), it is "WE" the people to whom I refer.

Reply
Check out topic: The Democrat convention
Jul 7, 2014 14:20:02   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Olden McGroen wrote:
=====================================

If you are inferring the next step is to take up arms (as in the Founders' days) then I would say that it's way too early for that. It could happen some day, but things will have to get far worse than they are now for people to actually have the stones to do that. Primarily, because they know it would be a losing venture. Now, I realize that the patriots of the 1770's took up arms against the most powerful nation in the world at the time. However, England was considered invincible due to their superior navy. On land, outside of their numbers and well-trained army, the colonists had fairly equal firepower. And in many cases, better longrifles. That's not the case today. The fed gov't, local and state gov'ts (which also includes police/sheriff) far outgun the average citizen. And not just outgunned, but out-ammoed. Not to mention other superior tactical and technical advantages. So, like I said, things would have to be incredibly horrid for the citizenry to take up arms against such small odds. We're nowhere near that right now.
===================================== br br If yo... (show quote)


Do you really think that any military rank and file would turn on their own people for justifiably taking power from the banksters and their puppet politicians? Let alone LOCAL authorities? If they did then we are/will be no different than the Jews the nazis slaughtered.

Is it really too early? When will it be the right time? When will it be too late? Is it already too late?

Pastor Niemoller-

First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Reply
Jul 7, 2014 14:37:25   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Feds to Send Riot Police to Murrieta to Impose Illegal Alien Invasion

Obama throwing his fundamental transformation of American into overdrive by inviting and facilitating the ongoing massive invasion of Third World welfare colonists may be the straw that finally breaks the back of our passivity. Resistance in Murrieta could dwarf the showdown at Cliven Bundy’s ranch. The Regime appears ready to respond with the same ham-fisted show of force:

As illegal immigrants continue to spill across the U.S.-Mexico border, federal authorities are attempting to relocate the migrants from South Texas to housing facilities in states across the nation. One such facility is located in Murrieta, California, where a large group of protesters recently blocked a bus full of migrants from arriving. The protesters remain there, adamant that illegal immigrants don’t get dumped in their town. But soon the concerned citizens may be forced to step down–Breitbart Texas has learned that federal agents plan to arrive in Murrieta on Monday with riot gear to ensure that another busload makes it to the housing facility.

Jeremy Oliver, a resident of Temecula, California–a town that neighbors Murrieta–told Breitbart Texas that local police officers warned the protesters that “it’s going to get ugly.”

Oliver said, “The feds are pissed that they haven’t been able to use this facility. Officers out there warned people that federal agents will be in Murrieta on Monday–they are going to get the next bus through no matter what. Riot gear and shields will be used to push the crowd back.”

John Henry, a Murrieta resident since 1991, was told the same thing by local officers.

“We’re being told that federal Marshals or ICE will be here in the next few days and that they are bringing riot gear,” Henry said. “They’re apparently going to be blocking off the street with concrete blockades so that no vehicles can get through. The River County Sheriff’s Department showed up last night and brought a huge watch tower that shoots up into the air 35 feet.”

The Feds are likely to have their way and go back to dumping hordes of illegal aliens on this community, considering that the confrontation will pit people like this:

But it will be a pyrrhic victory if this is the spark that finally ignites serious resistance to what Obama et al. are doing to our country.









Reply
Jul 7, 2014 15:10:35   #
Sicilianthing
 
Olden McGroen wrote:
=====================================

If you are inferring the next step is to take up arms (as in the Founders' days) then I would say that it's way too early for that. It could happen some day, but things will have to get far worse than they are now for people to actually have the stones to do that. Primarily, because they know it would be a losing venture. Now, I realize that the patriots of the 1770's took up arms against the most powerful nation in the world at the time. However, England was considered invincible due to their superior navy. On land, outside of their numbers and well-trained army, the colonists had fairly equal firepower. And in many cases, better longrifles. That's not the case today. The fed gov't, local and state gov'ts (which also includes police/sheriff) far outgun the average citizen. And not just outgunned, but out-ammoed. Not to mention other superior tactical and technical advantages. So, like I said, things would have to be incredibly horrid for the citizenry to take up arms against such small odds. We're nowhere near that right now.
===================================== br br If yo... (show quote)


I agree mostly, but there are many nations fighting low tech wars for decades and doing it with ingenuity... among other things...
I wont mention places out of respect for the VETS...
I'm sure everyone knows what I'm talking about though.
Lets' hope the peaceful path is the outcome.

Reply
Jul 7, 2014 15:12:33   #
Sicilianthing
 
buffalo wrote:
Do you really think that any military rank and file would turn on their own people for justifiably taking power from the banksters and their puppet politicians? Let alone LOCAL authorities? If they did then we are/will be no different than the Jews the nazis slaughtered.

Is it really too early? When will it be the right time? When will it be too late? Is it already too late?

Pastor Niemoller-

First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.
Do you really think that any military rank and fil... (show quote)


THANK YOU Buffalo, and very well put... my point in case to many a topic here...
The process has already started toward armed conflict, we are just seeing the usual preliminaries...

Reply
Jul 7, 2014 15:19:14   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
THANK YOU Buffalo, and very well put... my point in case to many a topic here...
The process has already started toward armed conflict, we are just seeing the usual preliminaries...


I am certainly not advocating any sort of armed up rising. But I will put it this way--IF voting REALLY mattered, then it would be illegal.

Reply
Jul 7, 2014 15:45:32   #
Caboose Loc: South Carolina
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
In this is the Redress of Grievances...
For those of you who still believe in a PEACEFUL Solution for Re Instating our Constitutional LAWS...

Problem is, when it's submitted and Congress, GOWNCLOWNS don't take action on it... what happens ?
I can only imagine what comes next... can you?


Its not what has happened under Obama thats so bad. The
Supreme court has ruled on many things that it had no authority
to rule on or was not in the constitution.

Such as:
Throwing God and prayer out of schools to please the communist atheist.

Roe vs wade. Authorizing the murder of millions of
unwanted babies.

Ruling against Crosses on hill sides and removing the
ten commandments.

Ruling for Obamacare.


Ruling for Gay marriage.

None of the above are in the Constitution, they are states rights only. One Constitution Attorney challenged anyone on the OPP
to show where the Constitution allows government healthcare.

Reply
Jul 7, 2014 16:50:44   #
Sicilianthing
 
Caboose wrote:
Its not what has happened under Obama thats so bad. The
Supreme court has ruled on many things that it had no authority
to rule on or was not in the constitution.

Such as:
Throwing God and prayer out of schools to please the communist atheist.

Roe vs wade. Authorizing the murder of millions of
unwanted babies.

Ruling against Crosses on hill sides and removing the
ten commandments.

Ruling for Obamacare.


Ruling for Gay marriage.

None of the above are in the Constitution, they are states rights only. One Constitution Attorney challenged anyone on the OPP
to show where the Constitution allows government healthcare.
Its not what has happened under Obama thats so bad... (show quote)


I here you buddy... loud and clear... it's all the administrations under the guise of the 8FED and Banksters for 100years...

Reply
Jul 7, 2014 20:17:57   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
buffalo wrote:
The "WE" I am referring to is neither arm of the corporate party(dimwits or repulsives), it is "WE" the people to whom I refer.


If only the "WE" were to become aware of their peril.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: What makes America great?
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.