It's outside the box.

I've noticed that when I post ideas from outside the box, people don't really know how to react, or it doesn't pull any of their happy-triggers. If I posted something like "Trump is a poophead", there would have been a ton of comments. But thanks for your interest.

Yeah, I do see what you mean about both parties having core elements that *could* work together and I agree that the changes in media (I would just call it democratization) is creating a new resistance to working together.

Not sure about the invasion thing... Maybe this is another out of the box topic but the question I have is how do you invade an invasion?

I think U.S. history, in its entirety, can be characterized as one long invasion, historically divided into waves. It started with the colonization of the North America's east coast and shifted into gear with the westward expansion of territory and industry and eventually to possessions and contracts overseas, including the banana republics...

All one invasion?
Yes.
Who?
The incorporated.

From the moment the Plymouth and Virginia companies were chartered in London almost 500 years ago to the USMCA agreement Trump was pushing 18 months ago.

Every last step of the way, power can be traced to a handful of proprietorships, almost always through the corporate method, sometimes leveraging the republic for muscle. You and I are lucky, we live at the apex of our usefulness as a middle-class. But the problem is that on the decline, the happy conditions we have come to rely on from our proprietors are going to fade as they move onto better returns elsewhere and the republic will be used to beat us away when we start begging.

So there's a genuine fight for the republic at this very moment. With the proprietors using their affluence to grasp for more control of their weapon while the progressives and democratic-socialists latch on to it by it's stated principal's ...and of course the Libertarians look on.. 'mind on other things.