Never should have changed. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. Folks just became plain stupid for everything electronic, when leaving shit alone would have been far better.
Never should have changed. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. Folks just became plain stupid for everything electronic, when leaving shit alone would have been far better.
Progress isn’t always helpful. Just look at the audience last night.
Watching another fiasco. This time the Iowa caucuses. You’d have thought with all the accusations thrown around after 2016 the simplest and most hack free process would be to go back to paper ballots. Does filling out a paper. Allot bother anyone?
this is what I was saying in 16 . if they want to insure a proper election then go back to paper ballots . aint no computer in the word will ever hack a paper ballot .
Where I vote we use scannable paper ballots where votes are made by filling in an oval with indelible ink from a ball point pen. It is then fed into a machine that scans and retains the ballot. If someone over votes or otherwise spoils a ballot the machine rejects it and a new ballot is presented to the voter. Absentee ballots are received by the city clerk brought to the precinct on Election Day and fed into the machine by precinct workers. The signatures on ballot applications are checked against those on the voter registrations at his time voters must also present identification or sign an affidavit attesting to their identity unless recognized by precinct workers. The ballots can be either recounted or rescanned and the ballots from each precinct are stored in sealed bags in sealed containers and kept in the custody of the local police.
Where I vote we use scannable paper ballots where ... (show quote)
I like that idea . but I still DO NOT LIKE COMMPUTERS ,