son of witless

Exactly. These tactics for stealing power have not as yet worked. If they do, watch out. Both parties go with whatever works. Just like when Demo-Rats set loose the nuclear option and later Republicans used it back on them. Pelosi is old. Apparently she don't care about the future and what she might have unleashed.

Seth

No, the Democrats don't think the content of their Articles of Impeachment are enough, in fact they know they're not.

They're just so desperate they'll try anything they can to get President Trump out of the way before November, because they know that none of their primary line-up can even come close to defeating him in the general election.

A clown show is a clown show. Warren, Sanders, Buttigieg and Bernie, sounds more like a comedy troupe than a line of contenders for the highest office in the land.

Had we not already gone through two years of "collusion," the demand for the president's tax returns, Stormy Daniels, "emoluments," et cetera, et cetera, an unending series of attacks by the Democrats (Pelosi, Noodler & Schitt, sounds like one of those law firms that specialize in frivolous litigation and advertise on late night TV and bus stop benches), these latest "charges" might actually be taken at least 3% seriously by the odd mongoloid or, in the same basic class, left leaning American. However, when one party spends three continuous years mounting one attack after another it becomes more tiresome to most people than anything else, surely nothing to do anything more than yawn over as one makes a note to vote for the person under constant attack rather than the aggressive toilet cakes doing the attacking.

It's a constant source of amazement to me that the Democrats doing this have managed to become so disconnected from the mindset of the average American that they truly don't see how badly this non-stop assault on Trump, a duly elected president, is going to hurt them come November.

straightUp Loc: California

When I posted that list of federal politicians that were convicted of crime, there were two columns... one with the list of Republicans and the other, a list of Democrats, therefore I HAVE considered "the beam in my own eye". But since my entire argument is to show conservatives who insist they are standing on higher ground, empirical evidence that their own side is actually more criminal, Mathew 7:3 does seem appropriate. So thanks for bringing that up ;)

Cuda2020

Yeah that’s it, the last massive shooting where the guy killed 33 people in 3 seconds, he didn’t train em right.

Cuda2020

Well let’s face it straight, they’ve never been good with numbers, look at the budget every time they get a hold of it. lol

Seth

But the firearm didn't do it... The shooter did.

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

Not to worry. ..i have trained spike to train others, he likes his too

Seth

son of witless

I say that your whole premise is flawed. I have a really hard time with the numbers of your two lists, because humans being what they are, I tend to think that randomly Democrats and Republicans should over a long time come out roughly even just by the law of averages. The fact that your list has Republicans coming out way way way higher on convictions leads me to several possible conclusions.

First, that your list is grossly inaccurate. Since I cannot prove that and I am not in the mood to try, I will pass for now. Second, that you are right and Republicans are by nature more dishonest than Democrats. I seriously doubt it. Third, that Democrats being far more devious than Republicans are just better at avoiding detection and conviction. Hmm, could be.

Fourth, and this is the one I am going with. Your premise is flawed as far as Republican verses Democratic voters because you simply do not account for the voters reactions after convictions. That is the real test.

Well there is actually a fifth. Nationally Republicans outnumber Democrats by so many that the greater numbers simply mathematically produce more criminals even when the %s are equal. I do not believe that one for a second because nationally there are many stupid voters.

Cuda2020

Maybe you should be on the receiving side of Trump,s insults for awhile, no president has ever disparaged other Americans as this tyrant has. He thinks this will expand his base, I don’t think so. He has the gall to criticize generals and other officers who have served, where does he get off, he’s just another high dollar draft dodger daddy paid for. Maybe if he went he would’ve grown some balls along with some humility 😊👍

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

Hey....i get insulted daily cuda, mind over matter....I don't mind, they usually don't matter

Sticks and stones my friend.........you shouldn't care so much, in the end......it matters not.

Cuda2020

You’re kidding on this one right.
Third, that Democrats being far more devious than Republicans are just better at avoiding detection and conviction. That’s Trump’s sign.

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

Yep Democrats a never say anything bad or derogatory about any Americans do they ?

Maybe Trump did dodge the Draft and maybe his Dad did buy him out I don't know that to be true nor do you for that matter of fact but it's always a good talking point you all like to use !

In 1965 I was about to be drafted into the Army for 2 yrs , but I volunteered for 4 yrs in the Air Force in which I spent my last year in Vietnam !

If you were old enough back then did you serve if so were you drafted or did you volunteer ?

Cuda2020

Yeah so do I but do you really hold the POTUS as the same standard as a common thug.
I guess I have higher standards for the POTUS

Cuda2020

He is a representative of our country, with that comes a greater responsibility then some slob. Now I see where the problem lies, you have no minimum standard.