J Anthony wrote:
I'm not a big Obama fan, but since I've been considered to be "on the left" by the Obama-haters on this site,, I'll take you up on your amusing little challenge. 1) If you understood how our monetary-system worked, you'd understand the debt has increased with every administration because the money-supply is created as a debt to private bankers. This is the crux of the problem. Money IS debt. The Federal Reserve is not "federal", but a multi-national consortium of large banking institutions. They "lend" us the money for the money-supply, at interest, while the principal continues to grow. Since we have to "borrow" our own currency, where is the money for the principal supposed to come from? After a hundred years of conditioning, most citizens have yet to grasp it. But the information is available, just not spoken of in the mainstream media.
This, the greatest sleight-of-hand ever perpetrated on societies, is reality. Go learn about it, you'll need to understand whats going on when the next crash comes.
2) Yep, Obama politicizes stuff too. So what? Every president has and does. It's usually just a question of why and how. Every president has lied to the people and has blood on their hands. The only differences are the means and the ends. The question is moot.
3)Because that's politics, isn't it? Especially in this plutocratic duopoly, electioneering never ends. Again, moot question. It's like you think you're having a "gotcha" moment when most people with any brains see both parties as hypocritical. The only difference is a matter of degree.
4) Well I suppose because, unlike Nixon, the evidence hasn't gotten so overwhelming for him that he's going to succumb to the pressure. Or, maybe there is no evidence to have. Let's not forget executive authority has been legally expanded quite a bit since Nixon, and presidents can get away with alot more than they use to.Does that make it ok? No. But what exactly is it that you think this president is guilty of that hasn't been done by nearly every president we've
had, and what is the evidence?
5)This is the stupidest one.No one says it's racist to disagree. But it is a reality of life that the most fervent of Obama-haters are far-right, extremist xenophobes, who think having a black president means the Antichrist is here, and most of them identify as Republican, conservative, or liberterian.Come on, you haven't seen some of the signs/t-shirts/bumper-stickers at some of those Tea-Party rallies? If the right isn't "d-wording" Obama because of the color of his skin, then maybe Democrats aren't doing the same to black conservatives either. Or maybe they are because Republicans are doing it to Obama in a particular way. We can't know this for sure, because no one in politics admits to being a racist, even if they obviously are. Trying to argue who is the bigger racist is moronic. We're supposed to be trying to get away from this crap.
.....I look forward to your self-righteous, indignant response. I hope you can enlighten me on how all the partisan tit-for-tat helps with the big picture.
I'm not a big Obama fan, but since I've been consi... (
show quote)
You are quite good at deflecting and diverting and changing the topic so as to try and nullify the argument or statement.
5 Questions To Smack A Liberal Progressive With
Screen Shot 2014-06-19 at 11.05.47 AM
Posted on June 19, 2014
Alrighty, folks. Heres the master list you need to ask your liberal friends and family with during a work break or maybe during this weeks BBQ or family reunion. Please video their responses and send them to Clashdaily.com. Enjoy via Allen West
1. If former President George W. Bush was un-American for adding $4 trillion to the national debt, then what is President Barack Hussein Obama who is on his way to adding $8 trillion and still has two more years to go? Yep, under Obama the national debt has risen from $10.67 trillion to almost $17.5 trillion.
So why isn't Obama un Amerrican for adding $8 trillion as compared to Busch's $4 trillion? You then go into the monetary system? Obama made that statement about Bush no monetary system mumbo jumbo involved.
2. If as Obama states, we leave no man behind, then what of Marine Sergeant Andrew Tahmooressi, Pastor Saeed Abedini and Kenneth Bae not to mention still-imprisoned Meriam Yahia Ibrahim who had her chains removed after giving birth to her daughter, Maya? (And by the way, she is still under a death sentence under Sharia law for marrying a Christian). Nah, those folks dont help Obamas political agenda and certainly arent as important as recognizing illegal immigrant children dreamers at the White House.
No politicizing at all what is so hard about the statement that Obama made in the fact that America leaves no man behind which is the creed of the military and they hold fast to that creed. Obama made the comment in regards to the deserter Bergdahl when hr traded five Taliban for him. What about the other Americans we are leaving behind then is the question and we still have a marine in Mexico that Obama is doing nothing about. If you make the statement then follow through on it all the way through that is.
3. When the average price of gasoline hit $2.50 a gallon, liberals and their media accomplices went apoplectic (you may have to define that word to a liberal friend) on George W. Bush. Why so silent now, when its $3.67?
So this all of a sudden becomes a moot question does it. If the liberals screamed their heads off about the gas prices under Bush why are they silent now? When Obama took office the national average price of gas was $1.87 per gallon and now its $3.76 in IL. and all we ever hear are crickets. Its not moot its because the liberal media is in the back pocket of Obama and the democrat party is all.
4. If the late and former President Richard Nixon resigned over a bad case of breaking and entering (and the liberal media made a big hoopla over that), what does it take for Barack Hussein Obama to consider the same? Or does the color of skin trump content of character in America now? By the way, Im planning on my computer crashing next year around tax return time.
No unlike Nixon the media is not doing its job in the investigation of their boy Obama. No one in the media is digging out the facts as they did back then. We used to get news that covered both parties and let the chips fall where they may. Not now the only fair game appears to be republicans and the media has a hands off policy on Obama. That started before election in the fact that they never vetted Obama and goes on from there. Every scandal that breaks all we ever get is the white houses talking points or should I say the white houses denial points.
5. If it is racist to disagree with the proven failed policies of Barry Soetoro, oops, I mean Barack Hussein Obama, then what is it when liberal progressives disrespect, dismiss, denigrate, demean, disparage, discredit and seek to destroy black conservative Republicans? Funny, all those D words come from the Democrat party. Dont believe me, just look for the responses to this post from liberal progressives (so predictable).
I am a tea party member and have been to many meetings and I haven't seen any of the racist shirts and signs yet. Of course I am in the mid west and maybe we are a little slow here as far as accusing everything wrong in Obamas policies as racist. I really didn't know race had anything to do with it but I do know that upbringing and ideology have a lot to do with it. As a conservative I can definitely can see a difference between Dr. Ben Carsons view points and ideas as opposed to Obamas ideas
and view points as Obamas view points are from a leftist progressive view and Dr. Carsons are from a conservative and maintaining the constitution perspective. Obama appears to be destroying America by overloading the welfare roles and now overloading them yet again with the influx of all of the illegal aliens.