Check out topic: White Ethnicities Are Being Replaced
Did we just get an Archduke Ferninand Moment compliments of Trump?
Jan 5, 2020 13:45:26 #
son of witless wrote:
Come on, don't go all wishy-washy on us. Take a stand. Since President Trump did it, it has to be bad, right ? I mean your buddy Colin Kaepernick came right out and condemned it. Trump did it, it must be bad, it must be racist. The only thing I haven't heard yet is Cowboy Trump. When Bush struck at the bad guys he was called a Cowboy.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/soleimani-colin-kaepernick-us-terrorist-attacks-black-brown-people
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/soleimani-colin-kaepernick-us-terrorist-attacks-black-brown-people
You are fundamentally right: if the President did it it is hard for it not to be wrong, dangerous, self-serving, and vindictive. His basic character in dealing with the world and everything.
Jan 5, 2020 13:55:24 #
rumitoid wrote:
Think about law and order. That is the fundamental basis of our Republic. We are not a government that assassinates enemies in undeclared wars, no matter how much he deserved. It was flat-out wrong, and if you agree with that action you spit not only on our Constitution but all principles of liberty. We are based, or were, on due process. Trump spits on that basic right.
Jan 5, 2020 14:00:33 #
rumitoid wrote:
You are fundamentally right: if the President did it it is hard for it not to be wrong, dangerous, self-serving, and vindictive. His basic character in dealing with the world and everything.
The guy's been a target for a long time. These people aren't like everyday folks. You can't reason or bargain with them. He killed and was responsible for killing hundreds of thousands of people including hundreds of Americans.
He should have been dealt with sooner but wasn't. Now we have people sympathetic to those who harbor terrorists all because they hate Trump. Either that or they're just weak. Or both.
Jan 5, 2020 14:04:37 #
rumitoid wrote:
You are fundamentally right: if the President did it it is hard for it not to be wrong, dangerous, self-serving, and vindictive. His basic character in dealing with the world and everything.
i am not as omniscient as many others. But how can it initiate a war that has been going on for 40 years? Again Pelosi and her cohorts have bamboozled their blind followers into thinking that they and the fake news media have the sole authority to make decisions. Perhaps they have tried to usurp the authority because they are irate because Hillary and her foundation are not headquarted at the White House.
Jan 5, 2020 14:05:38 #
rumitoid wrote:
You are fundamentally right: if the President did it it is hard for it not to be wrong, dangerous, self-serving, and vindictive. His basic character in dealing with the world and everything.
If it had come out that President Trump had the opportunity to kill this guy and had decided not to, you would have condemned that. You know I'm right.
Jan 5, 2020 14:18:52 #
Rose42 wrote:
The guy's been a target for a long time. These people aren't like everyday folks. You can't reason or bargain with them. He killed and was responsible for killing hundreds of thousands of people including hundreds of Americans.
He should have been dealt with sooner but wasn't. Now we have people sympathetic to those who harbor terrorists all because they hate Trump. Either that or they're just weak. Or both.
He should have been dealt with sooner but wasn't. Now we have people sympathetic to those who harbor terrorists all because they hate Trump. Either that or they're just weak. Or both.
Jeffrey Dahmer: due process or assassinate in a foreign country without due process or Congressional approval? Screw the Law and Constitution, this is serious, lol.
Jan 5, 2020 14:33:21 #
rumitoid wrote:
Jeffrey Dahmer: due process or assassinate in a foreign country without due process or Congressional approval? Screw the Law and Constitution, this is serious, lol.
You're comparing Dahmer with someone KNOWN to be responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths.
Shame on you. Shame on you for marginalizing terrorism. This scumbag was no freedom fighter by any stretch of the imagination.
Jan 5, 2020 14:34:05 #
rumitoid wrote:
I am somewhat on the fence about the assassination of Iranian general, Qasem Soleimani. The arguments pro and con are somewhat a wash, though I lean that it was wrong and a direct threat to national security...and worse. I am tempted to give the reasons for my lean towards it being wrong, and the split on the topic seems to go along party lines, yet I want to hear what you think. Was it or wasn't the right thing to do ethically, morally, and strategically?
he was a top terrorist planner . he planned and was planning more attacks on civilian and military targets . I personally agree with the decision to terminate the individual .
Jan 5, 2020 14:34:29 #
rumitoid wrote:
Jeffrey Dahmer: due process or assassinate in a foreign country without due process or Congressional approval? Screw the Law and Constitution, this is serious, lol.
In 1943, our military assassinated Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto. Do you have a problem with that ? Maybe you think Admiral Halsey should have been brought up on murder charges ?
Jan 5, 2020 14:49:23 #
rumitoid wrote:
Think about law and order. That is the fundamental basis of our Republic. We are not a government that assassinates enemies in undeclared wars, no matter how much he deserved. It was flat-out wrong, and if you agree with that action you spit not only on our Constitution but all principles of liberty. We are based, or were, on due process. Trump spits on that basic right.
sorry bub . the President is and was in compliance with our laws . the bimbocrats are just pissed off because they were not invited to the discussion on what was going to take place . why would any meeting of such magnitude include the party of leakers ? why would any one be willing to trust a bimbocrat , after obumer , gave the Iranians such a sweetheart deal ? gave them every thing they wanted plus 150 BILLION dollars to fund their terror around the world . so why should anyone trust a bimbocrat ?
Jan 5, 2020 14:58:01 #
rumitoid wrote:
I am somewhat on the fence about the assassination of Iranian general, Qasem Soleimani. The arguments pro and con are somewhat a wash, though I lean that it was wrong and a direct threat to national security...and worse. I am tempted to give the reasons for my lean towards it being wrong, and the split on the topic seems to go along party lines, yet I want to hear what you think. Was it or wasn't the right thing to do ethically, morally, and strategically?
You think it's wrong only because Trump ordered it, and you know it.. If it'd been Obama, you would be
cheering.
Check out topic: Yodays Funny
Jan 5, 2020 15:01:28 #
rumitoid wrote:
Think about law and order. That is the fundamental basis of our Republic. We are not a government that assassinates enemies in undeclared wars, no matter how much he deserved. It was flat-out wrong, and if you agree with that action you spit not only on our Constitution but all principles of liberty. We are based, or were, on due process. Trump spits on that basic right.
You call it assassination, killing, whatever you like, got the same great result.
This son of a bitch had no right to walking on the face of the earth.
Jan 5, 2020 15:03:26 #
rumitoid wrote:
Think about law and order. That is the fundamental basis of our Republic. We are not a government that assassinates enemies in undeclared wars, no matter how much he deserved. It was flat-out wrong, and if you agree with that action you spit not only on our Constitution but all principles of liberty. We are based, or were, on due process. Trump spits on that basic right.
BTW, our government assassinated two enemy leaders in Vietnam.
Jan 5, 2020 15:04:58 #
Jan 5, 2020 15:07:10 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.