Yes, Canuckus, and Santa Claus, or a Santa impersonator, has been known to commit a few robberies...
Run a comparison chart, percentage wise; terrorism (I'm sure you know this) is the activity of choice of Muslims, following in the footsteps of Muhammad, whom they consider to have been the perfect man.
Christian terrorists are extremely rare and far between, as I am sure you know, for they are completely turning away from Jesus' example and teachings if they do so.
The Jewish people are an ethical, self controlled, extremely well educated people. They do not commit terrorist acts, very very rare.
Any Sikh and Hindu terrorists would be far more likely to be found in India, Pakistan or Bangladesh than the U.S., and there again, cannot begin to equal the number of Muslim terrorists.
As for Buddhist terrorists, China has close to 50% of Buddhists in the world, even in Thailand, 2nd to China in percentage of Buddhists, terrorism by them is rare.
Have you had any terrorism by Buddhists in your neighborhood lately?
You cannot honestly paint terrorism among all these religions evenly and with a broad brush, It simply does not apply.
Islam's founder, Muhammad, lived by terrorism, a.k.a., theft, rape, murder. It was his profession, his career of choice.
That is not true of any other group you have named.
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Only Muslim terrorists? What about Sihks, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews and Christians? There have been terrorist organizations connected to all major faiths...
What if the Muslim terrorist came from a majority Christian nation?
Or if he was radicalized from within the US?
What if he was a wanted fugitive in his country of origin?
Or if he had dual citizenship? Would both nations be penalized?
Sorry Peewee... I agree that the ME is a mess and that we need to stop allowing folk from there to enter our nations willynilly... But I don't see this suggestion as being applicable to the issue...
Only Muslim terrorists? What about Sihks, Hindus, ... (
show quote)