Climate Change
Jun 8, 2014 07:41:42 #
If this isn't interesting...I have said for a long time that we are not given the full picture:
Jun 8, 2014 08:01:36 #
Dummy Boy wrote:
If this isn't interesting...I have said for a long time that we are not given the full picture:
The truth will set you free!
Jun 8, 2014 08:01:49 #
Dummy Boy wrote:
If this isn't interesting...I have said for a long time that we are not given the full picture:
The truth will set you free!
Check out topic: Bank For International Settlements Unified Ledger
Jun 8, 2014 08:58:09 #
Dummy Boy wrote:
If this isn't interesting...I have said for a long time that we are not given the full picture:
Good one. Good post.
Jun 8, 2014 09:52:13 #
Have seen so many charts on this it almost makes me sick. The global warming believers would have us head back to the ice age with all their rules.
http://isthereglobalcooling.com/
http://isthereglobalcooling.com/
Dummy Boy wrote:
If this isn't interesting...I have said for a long time that we are not given the full picture:
Jun 8, 2014 10:04:28 #
bmac32 wrote:
Have seen so many charts on this it almost makes me sick. The global warming believers would have us head back to the ice age with all their rules.
http://isthereglobalcooling.com/
http://isthereglobalcooling.com/
...I'm familiar with this site...haven't been it it in a long time. Although, I will say it once: global "coolers" won't have to fight that hard to win, since global warming has to make up data!
Jun 8, 2014 10:09:59 #
Dummy Boy wrote:
If this isn't interesting...I have said for a long time that we are not given the full picture:
i have to question that.we have on average 60 eruptions a month around the world.
Check out topic: Digital ID Officially Passed In Australia
Jun 8, 2014 10:10:57 #
Dummy Boy wrote:
...I'm familiar with this site...haven't been it it in a long time. Although, I will say it once: global "coolers" won't have to fight that hard to win, since global warming has to make up data!
:thumbup:
Jun 8, 2014 12:47:25 #
Dummy Boy wrote:
If this isn't interesting...I have said for a long time that we are not given the full picture:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jun 8, 2014 13:25:55 #
vernon wrote:
i have to question that.we have on average 60 eruptions a month around the world.
...meaning that you think they're calling anything an eruption?
Jun 8, 2014 13:36:04 #
Very interesting to note that the warmest periods recoreded we well before man invented the internal combustion engine and the first ounce of oil was discovered. Converseley, the coolest periods including the last 14 consecutive years were post modernization.
Unfortunately real science contradicts our current political agenda which is anti capitalism.
I recently read that since 1997 the worlds oceans have been steadily cooling to the degree that the Pacific ocean has actually contracted. Try to use real scientific data in a discussion with a liberal and get a good laugh at the jibberished stuttering response.
Unfortunately real science contradicts our current political agenda which is anti capitalism.
I recently read that since 1997 the worlds oceans have been steadily cooling to the degree that the Pacific ocean has actually contracted. Try to use real scientific data in a discussion with a liberal and get a good laugh at the jibberished stuttering response.
Check out topic: The Democrat convention
Jun 8, 2014 13:49:47 #
Dummy Boy wrote:
If this isn't interesting...I have said for a long time that we are not given the full picture:
Maybe you're just not looking in the right places. The chart you posted is just one example of information that maybe YOU didn't know about, which is why you're acting like it's some security leak... but the fact is this information is nothing new and it's not something ANYONE is hiding. The climate scientists issuing warnings about climate change already know about the temperature swings caused by natural occurrences... I mean "dugh"...
But there is an idiot culture out there that thinks just because of these natural occurrences, humans can't possibly have anything to do with climate change, which is about the stupidest thing anyone could ever say. That's like a doctor saying you're discomfort is caused by cancer, because cancer can have that affect, so it can't possibly be gas, or an ulcer.
So, not all historical swings in global temperature have been caused by industrial emissions. So what? Just because volcanic activity might have done the trick in the past doesn't mean industrial emissions can't do it now.
Jun 8, 2014 14:01:30 #
silverstrandneal wrote:
Very interesting to note that the warmest periods ... (show quote)
Chances are that "jibberish" is a scientific explanation that you simply don't understand. Where's your source on the cooling oceans? I'd like to read that. Or is it just another example of a political pundit misunderstanding scientific evidence in his frantic effort to find ANYTHING that "seems" remotely scientific?
Jun 8, 2014 14:45:21 #
The source you are requesting came from an article I read last week on Yahoo Finance (finance.yahoo.com) The data they posted was soarced by NOAA. Since I do not save my daily readings on this website. You can easily Google NOAA and navigate to find the research records. Political pundit? surely you jest. Just the thought of being in that circle makes me feel the need to shower.
Jun 8, 2014 15:04:20 #
silverstrandneal wrote:
The source you are requesting came from an article I read last week on Yahoo Finance (finance.yahoo.com) The data they posted was soarced by NOAA. Since I do not save my daily readings on this website. You can easily Google NOAA and navigate to find the research records. Political pundit? surely you jest. Just the thought of being in that circle makes me feel the need to shower.
Well, I did a search and the first thing that came up was a correction by NOAA itself saying...
"Recent analyses have revealed that results from some of the ocean float and shipboard sensor data used in this study were incorrect. As a result, the study's conclusion that the oceans cooled between 2003 and 2005 cannot be substantiated at this time. The study authors are currently working to correct these data errors and recompute ocean temperature changes."
I went ahead and read the report anyway and noticed that even there the authors are not saying this is evidence against global warming but rather what they called "speed bumps" in the process of global warming.
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2006/s2704.htm
So, it seems there would have to be some stretching between the NOAA source and the conclusion that there is any evidence global warming isn't happening.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.