nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

How much would that cost them?

Maybe not much but if he goes over to, say, Parler, it would!

Lonewolf

His advisors warned him about tweeting texting on the very beginning. Trump won't take advice from anybody. Twitter alone has enough evidence to get him convicted of obstruction

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

LOLOLOL!! You totally missed the point. How dense!!!!!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I'm not saying he should stop utilizing social media. Quite the contrary. I just think he's making too much money for Twitter, who are definitely working against him.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I suggest Parler. It's unbiased.

Radiance3

============
I think Republicans can create a system that no one could assault and tamper.

I will subscribe to that. Until now, I have not joined the Twitter, Facebook and Google.
I don't like their biases against conservatives.

I think what they are doing is illegal
allowing demonization of conservatives, and locking them up when the message don't agree with their liberal biases.

Must be punished for violations of others first amendment rights.

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

Um, well, actually...

This might come as something of a shock, so better to sit down before reading further. The social media platforms that seem to be doing the political hiring and firing across the world for the moment are not restrained by our constitution and have no obligation to allow or disallow anything, at any time, for any reason, or no reason at all. They are privately held businesses that are only answerable to their shareholders and even then, only to the extent that their share prices may or may not alter their market fortunes. Unless their shareholders start holding their feet to the fire, they are highly unlikely to change their ways, regardless of the noises they hear from the politicians in Washington.

So cry foul, scream how unfair it all is, but understand, it is most definitely not illegal, not even after elections are most certainly 'influenced', so get used to it or do something about it.

woodguru

You never got the point, what an idiot he's been for being the tweeting president from the start

Radiance3

================
Nope, something needs to be done.
It is an abuse of the 1st Amendment Rights. I hope that if GOP takes Congress in 2020, they could legislate a bill the could eliminate abuses shielded by the 1st Amendment rights.

Assaulting and plotting to kill a political opponent is NOT 1st Amendment right. Fabricating lies and verbally accusing the political opponent of lies are not 1st Amendment Rights. Prohibiting someone to express his 1st Amendment rights is not 1st Amendment right.

Those abuses must be looked into and eliminate the injustices and wrongs rendered by Facebook, Twitter, and Google. They must be held accountable, prevent manipulative abuses.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

It's my thread, my point, Woody. Get it? Duh.

maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee

Actually, when the owners use such a big social medium to sway public opinion, it becomes election tampering. When you censure just one side of an issue, then it becomes discrimination. Either of those two ARE illegal. If it's not illegal, then why did Mueller waste 40 million dollars and almost3 years trying to prove that Trump was guilty of it? According to you, a business is allowed to refuse to serve a gay person. Or a black person. Or a Muslim. Many on your side have said if you serve the public, then serve all of the public or go into some other kind of business. As far as being privately held, the conservative bakers and calligraphers were privately held but look what happened to them. Should Twitter escape the SAME fate because your party sees nothing wrong with Twitter cutting off conservatives? Careful with your answer...if you say no, then you deny that your post is true, but if you say yes, then you show everyone your real bias against conservatives.