JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

There’s quite a few entities that could bid for this title. N.K. comes to mind. How about the state of N.Y.? They just made it legal to tear a viable child limb from limb. I say this is the most evil because it’s intentional. Progressives always rely on science. Science tells us the unborn feel pain at a much younger stage than once thought. So they celebrated the ability to cause horrendous pain to the most vulnerable in society up to nine months. I’m sure Badbob celebrated with a tear a piñata limb from limb party. Plain unadulterated evil.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Didn't take long for the wackos to start lying.

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-new-york-city/newsroom/new-york-passes-historic-abortion-law-on-roe-v-wade-anniversary

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Saw the governor’s speech on this. Like you, sickening. The only one avoiding the truth here is your evil self.

woodguru

Trump, evil in it's sheer ineptitude and focus on personal gain

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

This is a story that made me cry and hug my son last night!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkrXximFShk

pafret Loc: Northeast

Did you really expect something other than insanity, non sense or down right stupidity from those posters?

North Korea is definitely in the running and their nuclear threat is ominous but South American countries like Columbia as well as Guatemala and Honduras are perhaps more dangerous. Their main cash crop export is death and destruction in the form of drugs, which have destroyed our society and is now bidding to exterminate large parts of our population.

The threat from all of these are serious but the actual warfare with the drug exporters has existed and is being ramped up to the point of invasion by armed private militias from these countries.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Why don't you post the new NY law?

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

What law, that is, what “just” law could possibly condone murder? Who then, would defend an unjust law?


Murder means stopping a life. That is what NY just made totally legal. There is no excuse. There is no justification. It doesn’t matter what a politician says or does. Murder is murder, and murder of the most innocent and indefensible human beings - babies- is NOTHING But reprehensible.

That you not only don’t see that, but refuse to see that, and additionally defend such a practice, speaks more against your moral state than ANYTHING else you could say or do.

ANYTHING!

Reprehensible is as good a word as I can come up with at the moment to describe this prevalent attitude to sacrifice living human babies for the sake of sexual gratification.

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

PR, Though heart-wrenching, I still have to say thank you for posting these videos.

Anyone who can’t see abortion on demand as legalized murder is not only blind, but heartless, probably soulless, and definitely, as the first one pointed out: inhuman.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Have you been living in a cave the past 50 years?

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

Did you watch those videos that ProudRepublican posted for you?

They have abortionists on tape admitting that should an abortion victim happen to make it out of the womb alive they would kill it.


That was murder 50 years ago just as much as it is murder today. Just because someone “modern” told you otherwise doesn’t change the facts.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

"Did you watch those videos that ProudRepublican posted for you?" No I don't watch PR's silly BS or from the Bird. Most of videos are from fanatic and are lies and BS.

redpill Loc: Oregon - not PDX

Well, well, well. That does say a lot about the validity of your posts... ie, from a person who refuses to be informed of the other side of a discussion.

Do a little research yourself. Put something concrete up for folks to have a rational discussion about. Here is a portion of the older version of the law... "Within the first 24 weeks or after 24 weeks if necessary to preserve the mother's health or if the fetus isn't viable."

I have not found the new version yet but read some of the statements about what is new. I however did not view the videos... sorry folks but I expect them to be gruesome and I get nightmares... I do not need images floating in my head for years to come.

Just a comment on the old version of their law... 24 WEEKS!? ummm that's 6 MONTHS right? That's at the beginning of the third Trimester. right? By that time I would expect the issues that that law allows for for an abortion AFTER 24 weeks should already have been known. The law IMHO was already far too broad.

Just to publicly state my stand (as if anyone cares). I can accept that non-viable fetuses should be aborted. I can accept that if a woman's LIFE is in danger due to her pregnancy that the choice of an abortion is valid. And I support abortions of pregnancies resulting from rape, however the option of adoption should be considered. (Rape is so traumatic, that I could see a woman not wanting ANY connection to that encounter in her life... if that decision is made WAY before 24 weeks, say week 4?)

Lastly, I heard but have not validated, that most PP clinics are in minority communities. The claim is that Blacks are encouraged to have abortions so as to reduce their population... a form of racism, some say genocide.

Re: https://statelaws.findlaw.com/new-york-law/new-york-abortion-laws.html

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

And you think that is a positive trait?

“When all think alike, then no one is thinking.” – Walter Lippmann

Basically you’ve just admitted to being closed-minded. Which is another of the hypocrisies of the left since they are so adamant that they are the open-minded ones.

I was raised a liberal (politically speaking) and expected I’d always be a liberal, but when I allowed myself to hear other viewpoints and critically examined my views, I became a Constitutional conservative. When I became challenged to critically examine my non-Christian religion, I was able to accept Christ. After being a well-respected teacher of Christianity, I still allowed myself to critically examine some man-made traditions within Christianity that I was taught, and was able to study myself into more truth (causing me to be ostracized by those who refused to challenge their traditions). My desire to continue seeking truth even if it challenges my current view continues to this day. Knowing the truth sets free! I will accept truth from any source it presents itself. I have enough faith in the power of truth to know that even though I may make some temporary forays into false ideas, truth will always overcome them, but only if I remain committed to being open-minded to challenging every thought.

Without an open mind, all you have is stale and stagnate thinking.

I pity people like you, when they are merely ignorant. Worse when they are willingly ignorant.

When I came to OPP, I spent the first year just lurking and reading. I wanted to see if I could find the common grounds to help libs and cons see each other’s points. The more I read, the more I realized just how close-minded and indoctrinated liberals around here were-just like you’ve admitted. And it made me even less empathetic of the liberal mind-set. In other words, trying to accept what libs, like you for one in particular, say, made me more sure of my conservative-ness. Not because I won’t listen to what you say or post or link, like you close-minded liberals do, but because I do open-mindedly and critically consider both what you are saying and what conservatives are saying.

Here’s a study explaining the phenomenon of your close-mindedness. It’s from the American Psychiatric Association (assuming that’s at least apolitical enough, if not left-leaning enough, for you to stoop to hear from)...

“Certain individuals, those with *close-minded* personalities, are even more reluctant to expose themselves to differing perspectives, Albarracín said. They will opt for the information that corresponds to their views nearly 75 percent of the time.
The researchers also found, not surprisingly, that people are more resistant to new points of view when their own ideas are associated with political, religious or ethical values. “If you are really committed to your own attitude – for example, if you are a very committed Democrat – you are more likely to seek congenial information, that is, information that corresponds with your views,” Albarracín said.” https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2009/07/like-minded.aspx