So which is it? Does google suck or do you like it?
proud republican wrote:
If you type up the word ""idiot" u... (
show quote)
What did you expect, the first thing that comes to mind when you think of Trump is that he is an idiot.
Kevyn wrote:
What did you expect, the first thing that comes to mind when you think of Trump is that he is an idiot.
More so when I think of you Kevy...more so with you.
maximus
Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Kevyn wrote:
What did you expect, the first thing that comes to mind when you think of Trump is that he is an idiot.
I'm sure you would know....seems you've had your whole life to practice being one.
proud republican wrote:
If you type up the word ""idiot" u... (
show quote)
I can explain it without reading anything the word idiot and Trump have been used in the same sentence to the point of being popular, the same with Obama and the word worst they are also linked. People should just accept it and move on. Instead of making it into a federal case. But the right to voice opinions belong to everyone.
maximus
Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
zombinis3 wrote:
I can explain it without reading anything the word idiot and Trump have been used in the same sentence to the point of being popular, the same with Obama and the word worst they are also linked. People should just accept it and move on. Instead of making it into a federal case. But the right to voice opinions belong to everyone.
It's like the old joke, "I looked in the dictionary under ugly and there was your picture". Even if Trump is an idiot and Obama was the worst ever, it should not be google posting these pages.
Here's google's lame excuse;
The search for the word “idiot” on Google apparently saw a jump after it was found a few months ago that it threw up images of US President Donald Trump. On Tuesday, American lawmakers attempted to understand how Google search algorithms worked and asked the tech company’s CEO Sundar Pichai about this particular case.
Republican congresswoman Zoe Lofgren posed the question during a grilling of the Google executive by the House judiciary committee. Pichai replied that the search results are based on ranks that takes into account over 200 factors, including relevance and popularity, to find the best results for a query. The questioning came after Trump’s multiple tweets accusing Google’s search engine of promoting negative news articles about him.
The Google chief was also asked if it was an example of political bias in algorithms, which he denied. Still, some Republican lawmakers on the panel refused to believe an individual or a group of people at Google could not change the algorithms and manipulate the search results arbitrarily.
That's what we get for Obama giving the internet away.
zombinis3 wrote:
I can explain it without reading anything the word idiot and Trump have been used in the same sentence to the point of being popular, the same with Obama and the word worst they are also linked. People should just accept it and move on. Instead of making it into a federal case. But the right to voice opinions belong to everyone.
Google assclown and up pops dozens of pictures of Trump, how can he get all this coverage?
Kevyn wrote:
Google assclown and up pops dozens of pictures of Trump, how can he get all this coverage?
Google Worst President and i see a lot of your Messiah obama comes up....A lot!!!
proud republican wrote:
Google Worst President and i see a lot of your Messiah obama comes up....A lot!!!
Why would images of Christ appear with that search?
Kevyn wrote:
Why would images of Christ appear with that search?
More like Devil with the face of obama himself....
maximus wrote:
It's like the old joke, "I looked in the dictionary under ugly and there was your picture". Even if Trump is an idiot and Obama was the worst ever, it should not be google posting these pages.
Here's google's lame excuse;
The search for the word “idiot” on Google apparently saw a jump after it was found a few months ago that it threw up images of US President Donald Trump. On Tuesday, American lawmakers attempted to understand how Google search algorithms worked and asked the tech company’s CEO Sundar Pichai about this particular case.
Republican congresswoman Zoe Lofgren posed the question during a grilling of the Google executive by the House judiciary committee. Pichai replied that the search results are based on ranks that takes into account over 200 factors, including relevance and popularity, to find the best results for a query. The questioning came after Trump’s multiple tweets accusing Google’s search engine of promoting negative news articles about him.
The Google chief was also asked if it was an example of political bias in algorithms, which he denied. Still, some Republican lawmakers on the panel refused to believe an individual or a group of people at Google could not change the algorithms and manipulate the search results arbitrarily.
That's what we get for Obama giving the internet away.
It's like the old joke, "I looked in the dict... (
show quote)
May sound lame but that is how algorithms work. If you have used excel there is a conditional command that can be used. It works the same as the algorithms, and like them you can control the outcome. The same with the algorithms but it would also effect other results. At least Obama is also being effected so the treatment is the same.
maximus wrote:
It's like the old joke, "I looked in the dictionary under ugly and there was your picture". Even if Trump is an idiot and Obama was the worst ever, it should not be google posting these pages.
Here's google's lame excuse;
The search for the word “idiot” on Google apparently saw a jump after it was found a few months ago that it threw up images of US President Donald Trump. On Tuesday, American lawmakers attempted to understand how Google search algorithms worked and asked the tech company’s CEO Sundar Pichai about this particular case.
Republican congresswoman Zoe Lofgren posed the question during a grilling of the Google executive by the House judiciary committee. Pichai replied that the search results are based on ranks that takes into account over 200 factors, including relevance and popularity, to find the best results for a query. The questioning came after Trump’s multiple tweets accusing Google’s search engine of promoting negative news articles about him.
The Google chief was also asked if it was an example of political bias in algorithms, which he denied. Still, some Republican lawmakers on the panel refused to believe an individual or a group of people at Google could not change the algorithms and manipulate the search results arbitrarily.
That's what we get for Obama giving the internet away.
It's like the old joke, "I looked in the dict... (
show quote)
Algorithms are man-made, humans are biased, therefore algorithms are biased.
proud republican wrote:
If you type up the word ""idiot" u... (
show quote)
and their CEO says they aren't opinionated
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.