Liberty's Advocate Loc: Cedar Rapids, IA

US Politics and News November 27, 2018

The globalists at the UN and in Europe were excited back in July when scores of nations mindlessly signed up for the new UN Migration Pact, an agreement that seeks to regulate the way that countries enforce their immigration laws. Under the leadership of President Trump, America was the only nation at the time which did not sign on to the agreement.

Now that we are less than a month away from the deal being ratified, other nations are starting to abandon the agreement when their citizens get around to reading the fine print.

Last month, Israel, Hungary and Austria all announced that they weren’t going to alter their immigration laws to appease the UN. Poland and Australia followed President Trump’s leadership in November, announcing that they would not ratify the deal either.

As of this writing, Switzerland is leaning strongly against it too. Most of Europe, led by Germany’s wildly unpopular Angela Merkel, are still in agreement with the tenets of this open-borders deal.

President Trump didn’t even have to think twice before rejecting this deal. It is as anti-American as it gets, short of calling for the ban of personally-owned firearms.

One of the biggest dangers of the “Migration Pact” is that it greatly extends the European Union’s already-liberal hate speech laws.

Voicing criticism of mass migration, whether it’s a flotilla of Africans trying to sneak into Spain or the horde of Honduran welfare hopefuls currently knocking on America’s doors from Tijuana, would be criminalized.

Individuals could be jailed for saying anything negative about migrant hordes. Television and radio stations can have their broadcast licenses revoked for having a guest on who questions the wisdom of importing the Third World into a modern nation. Fox News would cease to exist unless it fired everyone to the right of Shepherd Smith under this agreement.

The underlying assumption of the UN pact is that anyone from anywhere in the world can move to any other country if they feel like it, for any reason at all. Laws on accepting refugees were based on charity in the past.

Nations like America agreed to take a limited number of people in, if they were legitimately being persecuted and their lives were in imminent danger. Wanting to sign up for welfare and food stamps is not a good reason for granting someone asylum.

When Australia pointed out that it wouldn’t be ratifying the UN deal, it noted that this policy will only encourage more illegal immigration. This has proven true since President Reagan’s amnesty in 1986, which he viewed as his single biggest mistake in office.

Since the ’86 amnesty, America has absorbed 25% of Mexico’s total population. Are we better off as a nation for this?

California is now under a permanent Democrat majority and Texas is leaning that way.

Middle class farm towns from Idaho to Kentucky have been transformed into shantytowns by these new “Americans” that were imported without any locals being asked.

Is Europe better off for welcoming in millions of Muslim migrants from the Third World, under Angela Merkel’s encouragement?

A French court has just acquitted a Bangladeshi man who raped a French high school girl. His defense attorneys did not dispute that he raped the girl – twice.

Their defense was that he has “different cultural norms” in his home country. Well then, not guilty!

In Sweden, an 11-year-old girl was anally raped by two adult Muslim men on the way to school this month. Despite being able to identify the two men – who stand on the same street corner every day as the girl walks to school – police informed the victim’s mother that they couldn’t do anything.

No arrests were made. At least in France they still go through the formality of arresting migrant rapists before releasing them.

In Germany, an 85-year-old pensioner was murdered in his bed by one of Merkel’s Afghan migrants. The elderly man’s throat was slit. No robbery took place. Just another “infidel” put down for the cause.

None of these crimes can even be reported by mainstream media outlets in Europe – and that situation will only worsen with the UN Migration Pact in place.

Crimes like this were unthinkable in European nations just a few years ago. The Third World brings all of its dysfunctional baggage with it, no matter how good the host nations’ intentions are.

President Trump was absolutely right to reject this open-borders deal. Hopefully even more nations will follow his leadership when it comes time to ratify the pact.

Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!

MAGA BABBY, MAGA TRUMP

Seth

I've said this before and I'll say it again, a whole lot of people had better be careful what they wish for, because once they get what they presently think they want, it's going to be too late to change their minds.

What irritates the (expletive) out of me is that the people who want to make this happen, and I think defining it as "importing the third world into a modern nation" and "with all its baggage" sum it up perfectly, are attempting to force something on the rest of us that we know would have both indelible and tragic impacts on our lives, the safety of our loved ones and our liberty and ring down the curtain on America in every way we know and love this great country.

Ofra Ben David

Amen, there is a hope it started with Austria let's pray for more to follow!

Bcon

It is U.N. Legislation of this sort that makes a goog case for America to get out of the Organizatin and move the U.N. Out of the United States. The U.N.is not my idea of world peace, rather it is more like hgworld domination.

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

Liberty's Advocate Loc: Cedar Rapids, IA

Bush '43 unfortunately was one of these globalists as was his father, Bush '41. What the U.N. fears most about the United States is what is represented by the Constitution of the United States and NOT found in the U.N. Constitution for the NWO: Natural Law being the origin of the Rights of Man where the Creator is the source of our Rights - the Creator created Man, Man created government. But Government (especially WORLD government) has no power over 'Acts of God', which explains why it is so important for them to change the hierarchy to Government (the peoples' NEW religion, in effect replacing God as the source of our Rights), ending then with Man (secular Humanist view) with religion playing little or no part in our lives.

Whereas Christianity, its moral teachings, rules and precepts, had the primary role (a foundation of love and mutual respect, one for another) which underlies the tolerance that is BUILT IN to our system of self-government, and provides the boundaries for the proper exercise of our individual Rights within those boundaries while not favoring one religion over another, the secular view of government says those boundaries are prescribed BY government (laws forcing tolerance and Politically Correct beliefs on the people) with individual Rights replaced by "Group Think" and the elimination of any sense of personal responsibility for our actions.

Without the acceptance of personal responsibility for our actions, freedom cannot long exist because someone or something must be there to indemnify a person or group that suffers a loss at the hand of another. That "something" will be government, which must grow ever larger to accommodate those losses. FEMA now is helping to rebuild lives for those suffering losses from natural disasters. But have you noticed how the courts are gradually ignoring the responsibility of perpetrators to victims to restore them financially through restitution, and where a life is taken to ignore the value of that life by GRANTING continued life to the perpetrator in incarceration at the expense of and additional risk to society?

So you see, some of these "tragic impacts on our lives, the safety of our loved ones and our liberty" we have already inflicted on ourselves. You are correct in saying that this movement toward "no borders" would "bring down the curtain" on what is left of America and freedom, but getting people to see and understand what is beyond their nose is a difficult challenge when so many "short sighted" people are that way because they willingly focus on entertainment, whatever slanted opinion is presented to them as news and "education" designed to keep them ignorant, historically and contemporaneously. More than that, it explains why Trump is such a threat to the Deep State and the NWO.

Seth

Very well said!

In your first paragraph what you laid out pretty much infers, and I believe correctly, that the UN and, since their mutual thinking goes hand-in-hand, the EU, while both having been seemingly opposed to Communism, have adopted some of it's most oppressive elements.

The USSR/ Marxism saw religion as an enemy because they didn't believe in G-d standing between the State and the People. The State had to be the absolute authority.

The UN more than obviously has it's own embedded deep state, and just as obviously this deep state has its own globalist ambitions, ie the UN being accepted as THE central world government.

Globalists in various countries would have no reservations about jumping on to that bandwagon. This would benefit them, since most are "captains of industry" whose wealth would shield them from the milieu of the "unwashed masses."

Looking downwards from the vantage point of these ambitions/positions, the removal of national borders and sovereignty would be a logical step toward homogeniety of the global marketplace, one set of trade regulations that they have a say in drafting, etc.

This could actually be "achieved" as long as the global media, essentially as malleable and naive as are most "progressives" in our own society, continues to be utilized as a propaganda arm for the globalists behind all this. It's hard to choose between these globalists and garden variety leftists, since they essentially want the same things, which would be the end result of their getting what they want.

President Trump is indeed their worst nightmare, because he represents a sovereign America with an America First policy, and despite the portrayal of Trump by the leftist mainstream media as dumb, he's actually a lot smarter than the sum total of their entire collective. His adherence to items such as the Bill of Rights undoubtedly frustrates those people to no end, because, like his respect for national sovereignty, it acts as a barrier to any arguments they might mount to render him receptive to their, from an American viewpoint, oppressive menu of offerings.

Liberty's Advocate Loc: Cedar Rapids, IA

Socialist/Marxist/Stalinist/Communist - They are all just various stages of development of the same noxious weed, and the TRUE politics of greed disguised as a form of egalitarianism. Obama and HRC were peas in a pod - devotee's of Saul Alinsky and Communists at heart. But the Deep State conspiracy that they launched in an attempt to gain information on the Trump campaign ... once the truth does come out about the weaponization of not only the DoJ but our Intelligence networks as well and the corruption (treason) it all was designed to coverup, the American people will be better served through the exposure of those involved. I pray this happens. Are you interested in the names and interconnectedness of all these Deep State actors? Dan Bongino put up a YouTube video (of his speech hawking his book, of course) recently and I think you'll find it enlightening. Sebastian Gorka was at this event with him and others. https://youtu.be/_aevtHHULag

Seth

Thanks. I have it from an American Thinker link I moved to an inbox. I'll be watching it later on. I'm moving this one as well to make sure both links go to the same thing, though I'm pretty sure they do.

Carol Kelly

Carol Kelly

My wish is to send the UN packing. They’re a threat to our sovereignty.

Seth

And the sooner, the better!

Liberty's Advocate Loc: Cedar Rapids, IA

That is absolutely my wish as well. It is nothing but nest of spies anyway and definitely a threat to our sovereignty.

Seth

Back in the early 1980s, I read Arkady Schevchenko's autobiography, "Breaking With Moscow."

In it, he actually talked about how the Soviets had electronic eavesdropping gear installed all over the place, including in the ceiling of the main chamber to pick up private conversations between members of various delegations, and about how Soviet employees of the UN were required to exchange their paychecks for smaller amounts, the balances helping finance KGB operations inside Turtle Bay.

What would you bet that Putin's not doing the same thing, along with China and, for all we know, even Trinidad and Tobago?