One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Here is a fine example of what may happen here if Democratic Socialists get control
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 14, 2018 15:58:11   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
The poor people of Venezuela have suffered much more from socialists taking over than anyone should ever have to suffer. Here are some examples of what they are suffering and when I hear them say they I really get mad. Those people talking about the strong arm socialist government that has created a nation of only two groups of people, the elite and the very poor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCUq0V-3mgo

Reply
Nov 14, 2018 15:59:57   #
woodguru
 
You'll be fine, things will be better

Reply
Nov 14, 2018 16:09:47   #
Liberty Tree
 
woodguru wrote:
You'll be fine, things will be better


Yes, for those who hate America.

Reply
 
 
Nov 14, 2018 16:12:02   #
woodguru
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Yes, for those who hate America.


Let's just take it a bill at a time and see how bad it is

Reply
Nov 14, 2018 16:42:25   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
woodguru wrote:
Let's just take it a bill at a time and see how bad it is


Rather like the boa constrictor which squeezes the life out of you one small squeeze at a time, huh?

Reply
Nov 14, 2018 23:56:36   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
woodguru wrote:
Let's just take it a bill at a time and see how bad it is


Lets just take it a bill at a time. Do you believe the Senate will approve of any socialist bills that come in from the House? I don't but then the election is not over and it seems that Florida doesn't plan to allow its Republican people to win his part of it. Arizona managed to steal the election there, and California is trying hard to do the same thing. Now I see that you think the Dems will steal more elections like they did in Minnesota in 2008 for Al Franken.

Hey, Woody, do you want our electoral process to survive this year or not?

Reply
Nov 15, 2018 02:03:20   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Yes, for those who hate America.

If the socialists get control of our government, I highly doubt that things will get better for those who hate America. The rank and file morons who've been brainwashed into believing in the socialist Utopia and vote for this will suffer the consequences along with everyone else, they are not immune. Only the few at the top will benefit--for a while. When things really turn to shit, their house of cards will fall.

Churchill nailed it: "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Reply
Nov 15, 2018 11:09:15   #
Oldschool 101
 
That's telling them !!!...

Reply
Nov 15, 2018 14:49:21   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Oldschool 101 wrote:
That's telling them !!!...


Blade does a good job of telling them but what would the people in my introductory video say about it. They were all city socialists and seemed to like that crap.

Reply
Nov 15, 2018 15:58:56   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
oldroy wrote:
The poor people of Venezuela have suffered much more from socialists taking over than anyone should ever have to suffer. Here are some examples of what they are suffering and when I hear them say they I really get mad. Those people talking about the strong arm socialist government that has created a nation of only two groups of people, the elite and the very poor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCUq0V-3mgo

Video absolute lies, but hay, !! everybody does it, very few can sustain it, and no-one can get away with it consistently, because lies are a qualification for conflict.

Who is the Party of conflict in the US - The Democrats led by Hillary Clinton, no doubt about it.

CEO of Raytheon most recent comment.

"Because Democrats took the House money will really start to come our way".

Defense Stocks up since The Democrats Victory.

Basically because Trump is talking about NATO being a waste of money.

US can't win a partisan war any more it has no partisans only bent queers and crimes such as myself, but hay, who's ever going to say anything bad about me.?.






Reply
Nov 15, 2018 16:04:19   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
oldroy wrote:
The poor people of Venezuela have suffered much more from socialists taking over than anyone should ever have to suffer. Here are some examples of what they are suffering and when I hear them say they I really get mad. Those people talking about the strong arm socialist government that has created a nation of only two groups of people, the elite and the very poor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCUq0V-3mgo


All this in a country rich in oil.

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 00:26:48   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
RT friend wrote:
Video absolute lies, but hay, !! everybody does it, very few can sustain it, and no-one can get away with it consistently, because lies are a qualification for conflict.

Who is the Party of conflict in the US - The Democrats led by Hillary Clinton, no doubt about it.

CEO of Raytheon most recent comment.

"Because Democrats took the House money will really start to come our way".

Defense Stocks up since The Democrats Victory.

Basically because Trump is talking about NATO being a waste of money.

US can't win a partisan war any more it has no partisans only bent queers and crimes such as myself, but hay, who's ever going to say anything bad about me.?.





Video absolute lies, but hay, !! everybody does it... (show quote)


If I get to seeing you as a queer who wants to stand up for that bunch you can rest assured I will not hesitate to say anything bad about you that I think you have earned.

NATO is not only a waste of our money they are wanting to force us into their group and getting there because of the far left who have taken over our government. Yes, they want to force Agenda 21 on us and too many of our people don't understand what it is.

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 01:54:57   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
oldroy wrote:
If I get to seeing you as a queer who wants to stand up for that bunch you can rest assured I will not hesitate to say anything bad about you that I think you have earned.

NATO is not only a waste of our money they are wanting to force us into their group and getting there because of the far left who have taken over our government. Yes, they want to force Agenda 21 on us and too many of our people don't understand what it is.

Little boys shouldn't talk big , they get stepped on easily.

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 14:56:25   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
RT friend wrote:
Little boys shouldn't talk big , they get stepped on easily.


I am much older than you and won't be stepped on easily by you. You are the one who brought up the word, queer, I think.

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 16:02:28   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
oldroy wrote:
I am much older than you and won't be stepped on easily by you. You are the one who brought up the word, queer, I think.
ah ha so you are supporting the LGBTQ and were offended by my hostility towards Queers.

Nevertheless being offended was legitimised by statutes right across 14 States of the US until 2003.

Is being a drug addict illegal, legality was certainly compromised by the addict, so the seperation of power following up, is a cold and hot case, served concurrently, that's how a sentence is usually handed down otherwise getting the lot would be always at the Governor's Pleasure, and we all know what that's about, it's how the Screw got to be Governor.

Being offensive is allowed legally.

And the Acronym LBTQ, doesn't that stand for Lisbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Queer ? , I can only go by Google that's all I know, we all recognise the Q as either Queer or Questioning.

Probably Q was a nuanced after thought, maybe Q replaced C, that's the obvious acronym as Lesbian Gay Bisexul Transgender Community.


Lesbian Gay Bisexul Transgender Questioning sounds like an after thought, if LGBTQ was proposed as the "call sign" to denote the group which it was, or the group wouldn't use it.

Suerly then some-one would have rejected Questioning on the basis of it being interpreted as the supposed offensive word Queer, and if it was tagged by outsiders why wouldn't it have been shunned and complained about ?.

Or was it the work of a bot, because I would never accept the logic of a bot, if it was a bot just say so.


Anyhow after completing my exhaustive searching it dawned on me that the Q for queer must have been added to the signature of the LBGT community by way of affection, maybe a salute to reality, humm you shouldn't be taken back supporting the LGBTQ knowing they like to be calling themselves queers.

We Stalinists' are the same were very proud of Show Trials and such, your not alone, what's wrong with a thing being what it is ?.


Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.