Alber

If we look in a dictionary for the definition of socialism we could find the following: "Any of the diverse economic and political theories that defend the property and collective or governmental administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, carried out by the working class, eliminating private property, with the purpose of achieving an organization of society, in which there is a political, social and economic equality of all people. For Marxist theory, the aforementioned is a stage of transition of society between capitalism and communism, which is distinguished by the unequal distribution of goods and wages according to the work done." This definition is utopian. The reality is very different.
We have as examples of what we should expect from the socialist idea, the systems established in Russia (1917/1991), Italy (1922/1945), Germany (1933/1945), China (1949/Today), North Korea (1945/ /Today), Vietnam (1954 / Today) and Cuba (1959 / Today), which do not conform in any way to the previous theory; and we can say that they are systems that pretend falsely to situate the community on a higher plane, being the reality that the worker stops being the owner of himself; and from being a slave to the capitalist (according to the leftists), he becomes a slave to the system, which supplies him with what is essential to maintain life, while a new class enjoys benefits to which the worker has no access. Popular wisdom would say that all these systems are: "The same dog with a different collar". The fascist systems were and those of socialist communism remain, as repressive systems of control of the masses without consideration for human rights, with a single party, composed of a new ruling class (completely alien to the working class), with a maximum leader, subordinate leaders, bureaucrats, repressors and military.
The differences among collectivist systems lie in the control of the means of production, but ultimately, the result is the same in all those systems.
The creator of fascism, Benito Mussolini, was a socialist, in fact he was a Marxist in a red shirt, with a left arm raised with a closed fist, sympathetic to Lenin, and venerating Marx. But this man, when the First World War is finished, makes an analysis on the betrayal of the slogan of the Second Socialist International that leads him to make his socialism nationalist. This is where fascism and Nazism originated.
The Italian National Fascist Party will seize power in 1922 and will serve as inspiration for Hitler and the rest of the national-socialist parties that will be created later on, which are known by the name of "fascist" parties, often created with cadres that come from the socialist parties, just as in the case of the communists. Both socialist movements are practically parallel in time, but the advantage will be for Lenin with his triumph in the Russian revolution of 1917 and the global impact of the first socialist state in the world. And it will be the revolutionary methods and the example of the Bolsheviks of Lenin that will give a strong push to all revolutionary and totalitarian socialism, which will also serve as an incentive and inspiration for the National Socialists, who will copy their methods and organization, without forgetting that they also came from Marxism; and like the Bolsheviks they will have trained and indoctrinated political cadres, an organization of militias, the seizure of power through elections and / or revolution (national, in this case), the creation of a state of totalitarian dictatorship (which the Communists, deceptively and cynically, call ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’, when in reality it is a dictatorship against the proletariat), the prohibition of the other political parties and the militant opposition to democratic liberalism.
The left from early began to use the derogatory acronym of "Nazi", but if we listen to any speech of Hitler we will appreciate that he always refers to the party or national-socialist movement (Nationalsozialismus), words that are perfectly understood in German. Says Hitler: "We are socialists, we are enemies of the current economic capitalist system because it exploits the one who is weak from the economic point of view, with their unequal salaries, with their indecent evaluation of a human being according to whether that one have wealth or not, instead of evaluating the person's responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this capitalist system in all its aspects ".
Once we have known everything that is written above, we need to situate ourselves in the reality of the USA where the concept of the constitutional republic based on representative democracy, which supposedly should be formed with liberal-conservatives ideas, originated successfully and were copied by other countries. This ideas have been, in essence, traditionally sustained by the Republican and Democratic parties. However, in the Democratic Party there is a markedly leftist tendency that is already shifting towards radical liberalism or socialism; and we see how the members of the Republican Party are attacked with the insult that has become the word "fascist" as a mantra of the left, to excommunicate or demonize them, used against anyone who dares to suggest a minimal idea contrary to the ideological sectarianism of the left or its totalitarianism and unique thought. Obviously the object of this tactic is the stigmatization or ridicule of the adversary and the domination to silence any compromised discussion.
Precisely we are facing the greatest propaganda success of the left in all its history, having made believe that fascism is an ideology of the extreme right when in reality it is a socialist ideology linked to nationalist sentiment; that did not arise in the right but within the socialist movement of the left, after the event that marked the Russian Revolution of 1917 and that served to propagate all kinds of revolutionary and anti-system socialisms, among which we include those we know by fascism or Nazism .
The same success are trying to achieve the radical democrats, by making the ignorant believe that the Civil War, the Ku Klux Klan and the racial segregation in the USA were the work of the conservative Republicans (whom they describe as being the fascist extreme right), when the members of the Democrat party in those years were responsible for such mountrosities.
Fascism and Nazism are not the extreme right, the left can not afford a moral superiority to silence its adversaries with this accusation.
For Göbbels, Minister of Hitler's Propaganda, a lie repeated a thousand times becomes truth and one of the rules for the radicals of Saul Alinsky says: "Ridicule is the most powerful weapon of man." ‘There is no defense. It is irrational. It is exasperating. It also functions as a key pressure point to force the enemy to make concessions’.
The left lies about its purposes and blatantly ridicules its adversaries. The communist is an individual who lies, knowing that his interlocutor knows that what he is saying is a lie; and even so, he pretends to be believed. I think that the radical democrats, without any kind of modesty, are using the methods of Göbbels and Alinsky.
For their part, Republicans use the word "liberal" in a pejorative way to refer to the militants of the Democratic Party, when they want to point out people who support radical liberalism or socialism, which is an insult to the true liberals, who are intensely hated by radicals and socialists. The correct way to call these individuals is: "radical", "socialist" or "communist". I do not understand how the true liberals in the Democratic Party can survive with the tendency of their current militants to social democracy. I also do not understand why they want to go towards socialism, which is an idea that has failed. I think that the American way of life is not perfect and that it can be improved, but it is indisputable that it is much better to the systems that prevail in other places, which is demonstrated by the number of people who want to migrate to this country, fleeing from countries where socialism reigns.
(In the third part we will continue exposing the functioning in the practice of a socialist system).