One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Obama Signs Law Banning Himself From Entering The US
Page 1 of 16 next> last>>
Apr 24, 2014 17:59:56   #
Patty
 
Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog,

You just can’t make this stuff up.

A few days ago the President of the United States signed into public law bill S. 2195, now known as Pub.L. 113-100.

The law aims to “deny admission to the United States to any representative to the United Nations who has been found to have been engaged in espionage activities or a terrorist activity against the United States and poses a threat to United States national security interests.”

In other words, if the US government thinks that if you have been spying on the United States, then they won’t let you in the country.

Gee, let’s think for a moment– who has been engaging in espionage against the United States? Anyone?

Ah, right. The US government. Mr. Obama himself. The entire US intelligence network. They’ve all been engaging in espionage against the United States, especially its citizens.

But let us not forget, the law also bars entry for folks who have engaged in terrorist activity against the United States.

Just so that we don’t mince words, my dictionary defines terrorism as the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

Once again, the US government. Violence? Check. Intimidation? Check.

The government has awarded itself the power to hold people indefinitely without trial under military detention, assassinate US citizens by drone attacks, or use tax authorities to harrass political opposition groups.

The Department of Homeland Security is working to purchase 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (and counting), enough to maintain a shooting war within the US for 22 years.

And local police departments are trading in their light blue uniforms for black paramilitary attire, combat boots, automatic assault rifles, and armored vehicles.

The whole place has become a giant police state where you can’t even apply for a passport anymore without being threatened with fines and imprisonment.

When the Republic was founded, there were three federal crimes listed in the Constitution: treason, piracy, and counterfeiting.

Today the number of laws, codes, and regulations is astounding. It is a federal crime, for example, to knowingly make a false statement to a federally insured bank.

(Naturally, though, banks can lie through their teeth and defraud their customers with impunity…)

Not to mention, there are hundreds of federal agencies as innocuous as the Fish and Wildlife Service which have gun-toting police forces to kick down doors and throw people in jail.

The government doesn’t rule with the consent of the governed. They rule through fear, intimidation, and threats of violence. They spy. They deceive. They steal.

So you can probably appreciate the irony and arrogance of the President signing this new law which bars spies and terrorists from entering the country.

The entire notion is so absurd, it’s like Barack calling the kettle black. And technically speaking he has just legally banned himself from being in the Land of the Free.

Reply
Apr 24, 2014 18:05:00   #
jay-are
 
Patty wrote:
Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog,

You just can’t make this stuff up.

A few days ago the President of the United States signed into public law bill S. 2195, now known as Pub.L. 113-100.

The law aims to “deny admission to the United States to any representative to the United Nations who has been found to have been engaged in espionage activities or a terrorist activity against the United States and poses a threat to United States national security interests.”

In other words, if the US government thinks that if you have been spying on the United States, then they won’t let you in the country.

Gee, let’s think for a moment– who has been engaging in espionage against the United States? Anyone?

Ah, right. The US government. Mr. Obama himself. The entire US intelligence network. They’ve all been engaging in espionage against the United States, especially its citizens.

But let us not forget, the law also bars entry for folks who have engaged in terrorist activity against the United States.

Just so that we don’t mince words, my dictionary defines terrorism as the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

Once again, the US government. Violence? Check. Intimidation? Check.

The government has awarded itself the power to hold people indefinitely without trial under military detention, assassinate US citizens by drone attacks, or use tax authorities to harrass political opposition groups.

The Department of Homeland Security is working to purchase 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (and counting), enough to maintain a shooting war within the US for 22 years.

And local police departments are trading in their light blue uniforms for black paramilitary attire, combat boots, automatic assault rifles, and armored vehicles.

The whole place has become a giant police state where you can’t even apply for a passport anymore without being threatened with fines and imprisonment.

When the Republic was founded, there were three federal crimes listed in the Constitution: treason, piracy, and counterfeiting.

Today the number of laws, codes, and regulations is astounding. It is a federal crime, for example, to knowingly make a false statement to a federally insured bank.

(Naturally, though, banks can lie through their teeth and defraud their customers with impunity…)

Not to mention, there are hundreds of federal agencies as innocuous as the Fish and Wildlife Service which have gun-toting police forces to kick down doors and throw people in jail.

The government doesn’t rule with the consent of the governed. They rule through fear, intimidation, and threats of violence. They spy. They deceive. They steal.

So you can probably appreciate the irony and arrogance of the President signing this new law which bars spies and terrorists from entering the country.

The entire notion is so absurd, it’s like Barack calling the kettle black. And technically speaking he has just legally banned himself from being in the Land of the Free.
Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog, b... (show quote)


Who can we get to enforce the law?

Reply
Apr 24, 2014 18:06:14   #
Patty
 
jay-are wrote:
Who can we get to enforce the law?


Congress....... That was a joke Jay. :lol:

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2014 18:09:50   #
jay-are
 
Patty wrote:
Congress....... That was a joke Jay. :lol:


The rule of law is a thing of the past. We have a king now, so we just have rule by fiat. No one has any authority to enforce any laws, and no one is willing to give it a try, because everyone is willing to destroy anyone who tries to enforce the law.

And besides that, laws don't mean what is written in them. They only mean whatever someone in government wants them to mean at any given time. At another time, they can mean something completely different.

Reply
Apr 24, 2014 18:13:24   #
Patty
 
You know I would love to see one of these guys stand up and say "Look this is what they have on me. Am I human? Yep, but lets clear the air so I can represent the people here" I would actually have some respect for someone like that if he started working to get some of the others out.
jay-are wrote:
The rule of law is a thing of the past. We have a king now, so we just have rule by fiat. No one has any authority to enforce any laws, and no one is willing to give it a try, because everyone is willing to destroy anyone who tries to enforce the law.

Reply
Apr 24, 2014 18:17:25   #
Comment Loc: California
 
Patty wrote:
Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog,

You just can’t make this stuff up.

A few days ago the President of the United States signed into public law bill S. 2195, now known as Pub.L. 113-100.

The law aims to “deny admission to the United States to any representative to the United Nations who has been found to have been engaged in espionage activities or a terrorist activity against the United States and poses a threat to United States national security interests.”

In other words, if the US government thinks that if you have been spying on the United States, then they won’t let you in the country.

Gee, let’s think for a moment– who has been engaging in espionage against the United States? Anyone?

Ah, right. The US government. Mr. Obama himself. The entire US intelligence network. They’ve all been engaging in espionage against the United States, especially its citizens.

But let us not forget, the law also bars entry for folks who have engaged in terrorist activity against the United States.

Just so that we don’t mince words, my dictionary defines terrorism as the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

Once again, the US government. Violence? Check. Intimidation? Check.

The government has awarded itself the power to hold people indefinitely without trial under military detention, assassinate US citizens by drone attacks, or use tax authorities to harrass political opposition groups.

The Department of Homeland Security is working to purchase 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (and counting), enough to maintain a shooting war within the US for 22 years.

And local police departments are trading in their light blue uniforms for black paramilitary attire, combat boots, automatic assault rifles, and armored vehicles.

The whole place has become a giant police state where you can’t even apply for a passport anymore without being threatened with fines and imprisonment.

When the Republic was founded, there were three federal crimes listed in the Constitution: treason, piracy, and counterfeiting.

Today the number of laws, codes, and regulations is astounding. It is a federal crime, for example, to knowingly make a false statement to a federally insured bank.

(Naturally, though, banks can lie through their teeth and defraud their customers with impunity…)

Not to mention, there are hundreds of federal agencies as innocuous as the Fish and Wildlife Service which have gun-toting police forces to kick down doors and throw people in jail.

The government doesn’t rule with the consent of the governed. They rule through fear, intimidation, and threats of violence. They spy. They deceive. They steal.

So you can probably appreciate the irony and arrogance of the President signing this new law which bars spies and terrorists from entering the country.

The entire notion is so absurd, it’s like Barack calling the kettle black. And technically speaking he has just legally banned himself from being in the Land of the Free.
Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog, b... (show quote)



It was reported on Fox just a little while ago that while the president was signing the law he said he would not enforce it.

Reply
Apr 24, 2014 18:17:56   #
jay-are
 
Patty wrote:
You know I would love to see one of these guys stand up and say "Look this is what they have on me. Am I human? Yep, but lets clear the air so I can represent the people here" I would actually have some respect for someone like that if he started working to get some of the others out.


I would go for that, and I would also suggest a crazy concept - lets find people that don't have a criminal record and get them to run for office.

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2014 18:28:22   #
mkewlkez
 
Patty wrote:
Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog,

You just can’t make this stuff up.

A few days ago the President of the United States signed into public law bill S. 2195, now known as Pub.L. 113-100.

The law aims to “deny admission to the United States to any representative to the United Nations who has been found to have been engaged in espionage activities or a terrorist activity against the United States and poses a threat to United States national security interests.”

In other words, if the US government thinks that if you have been spying on the United States, then they won’t let you in the country.

Gee, let’s think for a moment– who has been engaging in espionage against the United States? Anyone?

Ah, right. The US government. Mr. Obama himself. The entire US intelligence network. They’ve all been engaging in espionage against the United States, especially its citizens.

But let us not forget, the law also bars entry for folks who have engaged in terrorist activity against the United States.

Just so that we don’t mince words, my dictionary defines terrorism as the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

Once again, the US government. Violence? Check. Intimidation? Check.

The government has awarded itself the power to hold people indefinitely without trial under military detention, assassinate US citizens by drone attacks, or use tax authorities to harrass political opposition groups.

The Department of Homeland Security is working to purchase 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (and counting), enough to maintain a shooting war within the US for 22 years.

And local police departments are trading in their light blue uniforms for black paramilitary attire, combat boots, automatic assault rifles, and armored vehicles.

The whole place has become a giant police state where you can’t even apply for a passport anymore without being threatened with fines and imprisonment.

When the Republic was founded, there were three federal crimes listed in the Constitution: treason, piracy, and counterfeiting.

Today the number of laws, codes, and regulations is astounding. It is a federal crime, for example, to knowingly make a false statement to a federally insured bank.

(Naturally, though, banks can lie through their teeth and defraud their customers with impunity…)

Not to mention, there are hundreds of federal agencies as innocuous as the Fish and Wildlife Service which have gun-toting police forces to kick down doors and throw people in jail.

The government doesn’t rule with the consent of the governed. They rule through fear, intimidation, and threats of violence. They spy. They deceive. They steal.

So you can probably appreciate the irony and arrogance of the President signing this new law which bars spies and terrorists from entering the country.

The entire notion is so absurd, it’s like Barack calling the kettle black. And technically speaking he has just legally banned himself from being in the Land of the Free.
Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog, b... (show quote)


Patty, you've got it going on! A truly 'spot on' post that couldn't be better. I want to be your friend! :lol: :shock: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Apr 24, 2014 18:34:22   #
Patty
 
I didn't write it but we can still be friends cant we?
Sovereign Man blog

mkewlkez wrote:
Patty, you've got it going on! A truly 'spot on' post that couldn't be better. I want to be your friend! :lol: :shock: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :lol: :lol:


8-)

Reply
Apr 24, 2014 18:44:10   #
3jack
 
Patty wrote:
Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog,

You just can’t make this stuff up.

A few days ago the President of the United States signed into public law bill S. 2195, now known as Pub.L. 113-100.

The law aims to “deny admission to the United States to any representative to the United Nations who has been found to have been engaged in espionage activities or a terrorist activity against the United States and poses a threat to United States national security interests.”

In other words, if the US government thinks that if you have been spying on the United States, then they won’t let you in the country.

Gee, let’s think for a moment– who has been engaging in espionage against the United States? Anyone?

Ah, right. The US government. Mr. Obama himself. The entire US intelligence network. They’ve all been engaging in espionage against the United States, especially its citizens.

But let us not forget, the law also bars entry for folks who have engaged in terrorist activity against the United States.

Just so that we don’t mince words, my dictionary defines terrorism as the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

Once again, the US government. Violence? Check. Intimidation? Check.

The government has awarded itself the power to hold people indefinitely without trial under military detention, assassinate US citizens by drone attacks, or use tax authorities to harrass political opposition groups.

The Department of Homeland Security is working to purchase 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (and counting), enough to maintain a shooting war within the US for 22 years.

And local police departments are trading in their light blue uniforms for black paramilitary attire, combat boots, automatic assault rifles, and armored vehicles.

The whole place has become a giant police state where you can’t even apply for a passport anymore without being threatened with fines and imprisonment.

When the Republic was founded, there were three federal crimes listed in the Constitution: treason, piracy, and counterfeiting.

Today the number of laws, codes, and regulations is astounding. It is a federal crime, for example, to knowingly make a false statement to a federally insured bank.

(Naturally, though, banks can lie through their teeth and defraud their customers with impunity…)

Not to mention, there are hundreds of federal agencies as innocuous as the Fish and Wildlife Service which have gun-toting police forces to kick down doors and throw people in jail.

The government doesn’t rule with the consent of the governed. They rule through fear, intimidation, and threats of violence. They spy. They deceive. They steal.

So you can probably appreciate the irony and arrogance of the President signing this new law which bars spies and terrorists from entering the country.

The entire notion is so absurd, it’s like Barack calling the kettle black. And technically speaking he has just legally banned himself from being in the Land of the Free.
Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog, b... (show quote)


S-2195 Sponsored and introduced by a republican senator and co-sponsored by 6 republican senators....there must be something good about this bill, right?

http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/2195/cosponsors

Sponser, Sen Ted Cruz, R-TX....Co-Sponsers: Sen Dan Coates, R-IN, Sen David Vitter, R-LA, Sen Thad Cochran, R-MS, Sen Rob Portman, R-OH, Sen Lindsey Graham, R-SC, and Sen Mark Kirk, R-IL

Reply
Apr 24, 2014 18:57:54   #
skott Loc: Bama
 
3jack wrote:
S-2195 Sponsored and introduced by a republican senator and co-sponsored by 6 republican senators....there must be something good about this bill, right?

http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/2195/cosponsors

Sponser, Sen Ted Cruz, R-TX....Co-Sponsers: Sen Dan Coates, R-IN, Sen David Vitter, R-LA, Sen Thad Cochran, R-MS, Sen Rob Portman, R-OH, Sen Lindsey Graham, R-SC, and Sen Mark Kirk, R-IL


If this were true, since Congress has repeatedly voted for NSA spying, then none of them could enter the country either. Or for that matter the former president.

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2014 18:59:25   #
Patty
 
Maybe its a set up.
3jack wrote:
S-2195 Sponsored and introduced by a republican senator and co-sponsored by 6 republican senators....there must be something good about this bill, right?

http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/2195/cosponsors

Sponser, Sen Ted Cruz, R-TX....Co-Sponsers: Sen Dan Coates, R-IN, Sen David Vitter, R-LA, Sen Thad Cochran, R-MS, Sen Rob Portman, R-OH, Sen Lindsey Graham, R-SC, and Sen Mark Kirk, R-IL


:roll: :roll: :roll:

Reply
Apr 24, 2014 21:23:48   #
Jack2014
 
[quote=Patty]Maybe,

It certainlY includes the TPers,I mean Bircher TPers. They clearly are domestic terrorists. Cruz basically forced the government shutdown verified by boner. Why would he reject himself? Desire to go back to his homeland-Cuba? C Rice initiated Spying on US citizens under Bushie boy so he can go paint In The Hague ,I wish. Cheney,of course attempted to destroy the country w his nuclear bomb BS along w other WMD made up story's. So, he could find a deep hole in Vietnam. Rumppsfeld,just shoot him.

Starts these pukes
Starts these pukes...

Read and weep,batty patty
Read and weep,batty patty...

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 12:38:37   #
skott Loc: Bama
 
[quote=Jack2014]
Patty wrote:
Maybe,

It certainlY includes the TPers,I mean Bircher TPers. They clearly are domestic terrorists. Cruz basically forced the government shutdown verified by boner. Why would he reject himself? Desire to go back to his homeland-Cuba? C Rice initiated Spying on US citizens under Bushie boy so he can go paint In The Hague ,I wish. Cheney,of course attempted to destroy the country w his nuclear bomb BS along w other WMD made up story's. So, he could find a deep hole in Vietnam. Rumppsfeld,just shoot him.
Maybe, br br It certainlY includes the TPers,I me... (show quote)


I agree with the second visual completely, but Bush was in the reserves.

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 13:48:19   #
Jack2014
 
skott wrote:
I agree with the second visual completely, but Bush was in the reserves.

I'm not going to disagree with you but bush was barely in the NG. Daddy obviously got him in. He probably didn't know where he was most of the time due to alcohol consumption. I believe he drank so much he burned his brain out. The Texas and Arkansas NG were jokes in those days. It was the route to avoid Vietnam. They were not mission ready for anything.

Burned out brain or just stupid
Burned out brain or just stupid...

Reply
Page 1 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.