One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Koch brothers' agenda
Page <prev 2 of 10 next> last>>
Apr 22, 2014 12:44:57   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
alabuck wrote:
You don't want to discuss anything, bukaroo. You just want to repeat Dirty, greedy Harry's hypocritical rant against the Koch brothers. Which I am not defending, BTW. While he, you and the rest of the leftist/liberal/progressive hypocrits ignore the same influence buying from Soros and Steyer. My point is that the money needs to be taken out of politics.

Wrong, Buffalo breath! I would like to discuss this. I'm new here. You don't know me from Adam's house cat. For you to make the assumption that I don't want to discuss anything is rather closed-minded. I can't help what others have done or said to you to make you paint me with such a wide brush. And, for you to immediately jump into name-calling, DOSENT indicate very much knowledge of the facts on your part. Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.

I, too, would like to see the BIG PAC money removed from politics; along with lobbyists.

Also, this isn't a rant from Dirty Harry. Bernie Sanders wrote the original article, not Reid. Get your facts straight, please.
You don't want to discuss anything, bukaroo. You j... (show quote)


Reid is the one that continually rants about the evil Koch brothers and thier money, while ignoring the same or worse in those that support the leftist/liberal/progressive hypocritical agenda with their money.. I know who wrote the bullshit! And for you too ignore what Soros and Steyer, et al do makes you a hypocrit, also.

I happen to agree with about 75% of that list.

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 13:29:24   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Steve700 wrote:
Why do you waste your time having a big problem with the Koch brothers. The real problem is the really huge contributor (10 times that of the Koch brothers), the evil George Soros, who along with the rest of the illuminati, pulls the strings of the puppet Obama to demote America so that we can be acclimated into the the New World Order. (That is why Obama was selected for us.)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 13:32:32   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
maelstrom wrote:
Your dismal philosophy is, "if your honest you lose" ??

I don't know where you get anything Obama has ever said as extreme. He has tried to implement improvements that were originally created from the right perspective, ie. ACA


:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 13:57:44   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
Reid is the one that continually rants about the evil Koch brothers and thier money, while ignoring the same or worse in those that support the leftist/liberal/progressive hypocritical agenda with their money.. I know who wrote the bullshit! And for you too ignore what Soros and Steyer, et al do makes you a hypocrit, also.

I happen to agree with about 75% of that list.
---------------------------

Well, suppose you stop your rhetorical ranting and make a verifiable listing of what/to whom Soros and Steyer have donated to, and compare it to the myriad of organizations the Koch's have begun and/or funded, then put it out here for all of to read and comment on.

I can understand that you actually doing your own research may go against everything you hold holy. But, by doing your own research, you have the opportunity to see and learn that there are other opinions out there that are just as viable as yours. Or, Heaven forbid, you may even find out that your beliefs are not as viable as you were lead to believe they are. I presume that your beliefs/ comments/ ideals/ political positions are given to you to parrot as you've presented nothing to support them other than name-calling, empty political rhetoric and broad, sweeping, unsubstantiated generalizations.

I couldn't care less what Reid says about the Koch brothers. He's no worse or better than McConnell and Boehner and their tirades against Obama and the Dems.

What 25% do you not agree with? Perhaps, that could become the basis for some common ground.

Another old adage goes: "it takes one to know one." Remember that the next time you want to call me a hypocrite. (You may also want to check your spelling on that word.) In the mean-time, kindly refrain from calling me names. This is the 2nd time I've made that request of you. :thumbdown:

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 14:06:50   #
stevenkalka
 
Alabuck, you think by posting the Koch Bros. agenda that that's it, no more discussion. Maybe the next level might be how some ideas may be okay if partially enacted, as some already have. I can think of some examples:

Allow health insurance to be purchased across state lines.

While Social Security still stands, there is a greater availability of 401(K), IRAs, and other alternatives.

While I myself wouldn't eliminate the US Post Office, why can't it cope with diminished business by having more self service kiosks, or advertising on their trucks? It's so inflexible.

How many public school districts allow a handful of students to attend alternate charter schools at public expense, much to the chagrin of public teachers unions?

Might we be better off replacing federal income taxes with consumption taxes? We would capture revenue lost from unreported income and retain greater privacy.

The Koch Bros. hire quite a number of unionized employees. I happen to respect the high level of philanthropy from them. Lincoln Center in New York City (an opera and symphonic hall), science programs I've watched on PBS. They got flack from some folks who don't like a new wing in Presbyterian Hospital in NYC they want to finance.

Alabuck, you obviously did no research or chose to sweep their public endowments under the rug.

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 14:30:54   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
stevenkalka wrote:
The Koch Bros. hire quite a number of unionized employees. I happen to respect the high level of philanthropy from them. Lincoln Center in New York City (an opera and symphonic hall), science programs I've watched on PBS. They got flack from some folks who don't like a new wing in Presbyterian Hospital in NYC they want to finance.

Alabuck, you obviously did no research or chose to sweep their public endowments under the rug.


You are correct the Koch Brothers employ 1000s. How many people does Soros employ? The Soros/Koch comparison is an interesting one. Soros and Buffett both made their fortunes in finance. They made money by moving money. Steyer , as a hedge fund manager , also makes money from money.

The Kochs, on the other hand, made their fortunes in manufacturing. They made money by moving product.

I wonder if there is something about the mindset of finance that produces leftist thinking, while actually having to please consumers produces a rightward mindset at least in practice, if not philosophy.

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 14:41:43   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
Alabuck, you think by posting the Koch Bros. agenda that that's it, no more discussion. Maybe the next level might be how some ideas may be okay if partially enacted, as some already have. I can think of some examples:

Allow health insurance to be purchased across state lines.
--------
I'm all for it! How do you propose getting the several states to align their regs to compliment each other? Right now, you have 50 states with 50 different sets of regs. Should the federal govt get involved? That opens you up to wanting more, big, invasive government.

While Social Security still stands, there is a greater availability of 401(K), IRAs, and other alternatives.
-------
SS is based on the premise of everyone contributing to it. If people take their SS money elsewhere, it will have a detrimental effect on SS. Besides, Bush 2 wanted to privatize SS and put it in the stock market. Shortly thereafter, the market crashed. I was very glad that Bush hadn't privatized SS at that point.

While I myself wouldn't eliminate the US Post Office, why can't it cope with diminished business by having more self service kiosks, or advertising on their trucks? It's so inflexible.
-------
You'll need to ask Congress. They're the ones who tell the USPS what it can and can't do.

How many public school districts allow a handful of students to attend alternate charter schools at public expense, much to the chagrin of public teachers unions?
-------
Preach-on, brother! I'm with you 100% on that one! In Tennessee, the Republican controlled government eliminated the teacher unions' ability to bargain for pay and benefits.

Might we be better off replacing federal income taxes with consumption taxes? We would capture revenue lost from unreported income and retain greater privacy.
-------
Good idea! Don't forget to include corporate taxes, too. Eliminate their ability to hide their profits off-shore. Oh wait! Now, you're hurting the "job creators."

The Koch Bros. hire quite a number of unionized employees. I happen to respect the high level of philanthropy from them. Lincoln Center in New York City (an opera and symphonic hall), science programs I've watched on PBS. They got flack from some folks who don't like a new wing in Presbyterian Hospital in NYC they want to finance.
---------
I disagree politically with the Koch brothers. What they do philanthropically is up to them. Several of the "Robber Barons" of the 19th and 20th century did a lot of philanthropic giving. But, how they earned their money and other things they did with their money left a lot to be desired. Koch's are no different.

Alabuck, you obviously did no research or chose to sweep their public endowments under the rug.
-------
Well, how do you explain my OP? Did you research and find it? Did you verify its originality and correctness? If you can do better, go for it, big boy!

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2014 14:43:54   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
alabuck wrote:
Reid is the one that continually rants about the evil Koch brothers and thier money, while ignoring the same or worse in those that support the leftist/liberal/progressive hypocritical agenda with their money.. I know who wrote the bullshit! And for you too ignore what Soros and Steyer, et al do makes you a hypocrit, also.

I happen to agree with about 75% of that list.
---------------------------

Well, suppose you stop your rhetorical ranting and make a verifiable listing of what/to whom Soros and Steyer have donated to, and compare it to the myriad of organizations the Koch's have begun and/or funded, then put it out here for all of to read and comment on.

I can understand that you actually doing your own research may go against everything you hold holy. But, by doing your own research, you have the opportunity to see and learn that there are other opinions out there that are just as viable as yours. Or, Heaven forbid, you may even find out that your beliefs are not as viable as you were lead to believe they are. I presume that your beliefs/ comments/ ideals/ political positions are given to you to parrot as you've presented nothing to support them other than name-calling, empty political rhetoric and broad, sweeping, unsubstantiated generalizations.

I couldn't care less what Reid says about the Koch brothers. He's no worse or better than McConnell and Boehner and their tirades against Obama and the Dems.

What 25% do you not agree with? Perhaps, that could become the basis for some common ground.

Another old adage goes: "it takes one to know one." Remember that the next time you want to call me a hypocrite. (You may also want to check your spelling on that word.) In the mean-time, kindly refrain from calling me names. This is the 2nd time I've made that request of you. :thumbdown:
Reid is the one that continually rants about the e... (show quote)


If you wish to refute my assertion then YOU do the research. I KNOW what the Soros, Buh-fays (is that the spelling or the right pronunciation?) and Steyer stand for and are doing in the name of their leftist/liberal/progressive bullshit.

Another old adage goes--If you can't take the heat....

Oh, and learn to use the quote function.

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 14:46:03   #
Dave Loc: Upstate New York
 
alabuck wrote:
How many of you know just how engrained the Koch brothers' political agenda is in today's conservative politics? How many of you know that, in 1980, David Koch was the Libertarian Party's vice presidential candidate? How many of you know what the platform of the Libertarian Party was, in 1980?

Senator Bernie Sanders went back in time to 1980, when David Koch ran as the Vice Presidential candidate on the Libertarian ticket. He found their platform for that year, and published it again. It is a manifesto of what David and Charles Koch expect to receive in return for their large investment in American politics.

Here is the list:

We urge the repeal of federal campaign finance laws, and the immediate abolition of the despotic Federal Election Commission.”
“We favor the abolition of Medicare and Medicaid programs.”
“We oppose any compulsory insurance or tax-supported plan to provide health services, including those which finance abortion services.”
“We also favor the deregulation of the medical insurance industry.”
“We favor the repeal of the fraudulent, virtually bankrupt, and increasingly oppressive Social Security system. Pending that repeal, participation in Social Security should be made voluntary.”
“We propose the abolition of the governmental Postal Service. The present system, in addition to being inefficient, encourages governmental surveillance of private correspondence. Pending abolition, we call for an end to the monopoly system and for allowing free competition in all aspects of postal service.”
“We oppose all personal and corporate income taxation, including capital gains taxes.”
“We support the eventual repeal of all taxation.”
“As an interim measure, all criminal and civil sanctions against tax evasion should be terminated immediately.”
“We support repeal of all law which impede the ability of any person to find employment, such as minimum wage laws.”
“We advocate the complete separation of education and State. Government schools lead to the indoctrination of children and interfere with the free choice of individuals. Government ownership, operation, regulation, and subsidy of schools and colleges should be ended.”
“We condemn compulsory education laws … and we call for the immediate repeal of such laws.”
“We support the repeal of all taxes on the income or property of private schools, whether profit or non-profit.”
“We support the abolition of the Environmental Protection Agency.”
“We support abolition of the Department of Energy.”
“We call for the dissolution of all government agencies concerned with transportation, including the Department of Transportation.”
“We demand the return of America's railroad system to private ownership. We call for the privatization of the public roads and national highway system.”
“We specifically oppose laws requiring an individual to buy or use so-called "self-protection" equipment such as safety belts, air bags, or crash helmets.”
“We advocate the abolition of the Federal Aviation Administration.”
“We advocate the abolition of the Food and Drug Administration.”
“We support an end to all subsidies for child-bearing built into our present laws, including all welfare plans and the provision of tax-supported services for children.”
“We oppose all government welfare, relief projects, and ‘aid to the poor’ programs. All these government programs are privacy-invading, paternalistic, demeaning, and inefficient. The proper source of help for such persons is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals.”
“We call for the privatization of the inland waterways, and of the distribution system that brings water to industry, agriculture and households.”
“We call for the repeal of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.”
“We call for the abolition of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.”
“We support the repeal of all state usury laws.

If these two could just crown themselves Dictators of the World, they would. I have honestly never encountered more evil, fascist human beings and hope a day comes where they're viewed as fringe crazies instead of legitimate political actors. They've spawned an entire generation of "me-me-me" types who actually think these are brilliant ideas, thanks to Ron Paul.

Every single one of these ideas is rooted in John Birch Society dogma. Just because Fred Koch left the Birchers back in the day doesn't mean he abandoned their overall goals. His sons are just expanding capacity for them now, not abandoning their principles.

Think about the consequences of no FAA air traffic controllers. No FDA to gauge the safety of our food and medicines. No one to make car manufacturers build safe cars and trucks. Seat belts and air bags will become things of the past. No EPA to keep our manufacturers from polluting our air and water. No one to make our manufacturers provide safe working environments for their employees. With no taxes at all, who pays for the police, fire departments, teachers, our military, our military equipment?

Be careful people. You may just get more than you bargained for if you allow the Koch brothers to control your political party.

I suggest you keep this list handy. You're going to need it in the days to come.
How many of you know just how engrained the Koch b... (show quote)


Anyone who would use Bernie Sanders as a source to understand anything other than socialism or communism is already heavily into the useful idiot status folks like him relish.

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 14:59:33   #
stevenkalka
 
"If these two could just crown themselves Dictators of the World, they would. I have honestly never encountered more evil, fascist human beings"

We may agree in a number of areas, and even in your quote of their libertarian agenda. I just find your words "more evil, facist human beings" so ever the top.

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 16:01:56   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
If you wish to refute my assertion then YOU do the research. I KNOW what the Soros, Buh-fays (is that the spelling or the right pronunciation?) and Steyer stand for and are doing in the name of their leftist/liberal/progressive bullshit.

Another old adage goes--If you can't take the heat....

Oh, and learn to use the quote function.

What heat? So far you've not said anything to prove your assertions about my OP. Also, I named my source. No quotes are necessary. Learn your grammar.

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 16:05:25   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
"If these two could just crown themselves Dictators of the World, they would. I have honestly never encountered more evil, fascist human beings"

We may agree in a number of areas, and even in your quote of their libertarian agenda. I just find your words "more evil, facist human beings" so ever the top.

That was part of what Bernie Sanders said, not me. Perhaps I could've been more complete in differentiating what Sanders said and my comments. My bad.

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 16:10:50   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
Anyone who would use Bernie Sanders as a source to understand anything other than socialism or communism is already heavily into the useful idiot status folks like him relish.

You're just jealous that your side DOSENT have a man of Bernie's integrity and character on your side. Your insults prove it. You've nothing constructive to add so you resort to insults. Empty minds like yours aren't a challenge. Just move on and leave the thinking to those of us with some brains.

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 16:16:08   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
alabuck wrote:
Anyone who would use Bernie Sanders as a source to understand anything other than socialism or communism is already heavily into the useful idiot status folks like him relish.

You're just jealous that your side DOSENT have a man of Bernie's integrity and character on your side. Your insults prove it. You've nothing constructive to add so you resort to insults. Empty minds like yours aren't a challenge. Just move on and leave the thinking to those of us with some brains.


Bernie's integrity and character are more than what the populace, except for you Socialists, can handle. You are aware he is a self avowed Socialist are you not?

Reply
Apr 22, 2014 16:19:09   #
Dave Loc: Upstate New York
 
alabuck wrote:
Anyone who would use Bernie Sanders as a source to understand anything other than socialism or communism is already heavily into the useful idiot status folks like him relish.

You're just jealous that your side DOSENT have a man of Bernie's integrity and character on your side. Your insults prove it. You've nothing constructive to add so you resort to insults. Empty minds like yours aren't a challenge. Just move on and leave the thinking to those of us with some brains.


So, the only socialist in the congress is the guy you want to hold out for having integrity and character - if that isn't enough to have you question him as a source then there isn't much that would - and why would an intelligent human being even attempt to respond to such blatant and empty propaganda?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.