One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
‘We’ve Got to Make Them Afraid of Us’ Bloomberg isnt to bright.
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Apr 16, 2014 18:53:35   #
Retired669
 
jonhatfield wrote:
Jay-are, I've also noticed various peculiar wordings suggesting some of the hundreds of 'Patty' postings are from someone unfamiliar with a few of our many complicated language usages. Of course, many of us have common mistakes in usage...my mother in old age wrote 'most' instead of 'must.' However, the nature of the peculiarities I've seen with some Putin Patty's postings don't fit the ordinary mistake pattern...rather appears to be a matter of small oddities of otherwise very talented second language use.
Jay-are, I've also noticed various peculiar wordin... (show quote)


Be careful Jon or you will get accused of stalking again.. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :thumbup:

Reply
Apr 16, 2014 19:10:34   #
jonhatfield Loc: Green Bay, WI
 
Retired669 wrote:
Be careful Jon or you will get accused of stalking again.. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :thumbup:




:lol: :thumbup:

Reply
Apr 16, 2014 19:25:20   #
CDM Loc: Florida
 
Patty wrote:
Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg plans to spend $50 million in 2014 to build a “nationwide grass-roots network to motivate” anti-gun voters, the New York Times reports.

Basically, the billionaire wants to create the anti-Second Amendment version of the National Rifle Association. Eventually, he wants the group to be able to overpower the NRA. Bloomberg says gun control advocates should learn from the NRA and make sure there are consequences for failing to go along with their agenda.
He accused the NRA of threatening to go after lawmakers’ “kids,” “grandkids” and even “great-grandkids” if they don’t vote the right way.

“We’ve got to make them afraid of us,” Bloomberg added, according to the New York Times.

As the Times also notes, “Bloomberg already spent millions of dollars trying to persuade members of Congress to support enhanced background check laws with virtually nothing to show for it.”

Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, said the former New York governor has “money to waste” but eventually “he’s going to find out why his side keeps losing.”
Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg plans to s... (show quote)


Bloomberg is a communist asshole with lots of money...money he made in this horrible capitalistic system banking system that he pisses on now that he has no need of it. He is terrified that he is irrelevant and desperate to control human activity...the grandest game there is...for wealthy cowards.

He is a liar in keeping with liberal communist progressive methodology. His singular goal and objective is to confiscate all guns from all people except the federal government. An impossible goal; because when the Federal government is the only legal gun owner...those with no respect for the law will be equally armed and the government will not know who they are.

The only difference between Bloomberg and Stalin...is a mustache. He is not an American.

Reply
 
 
Apr 17, 2014 06:55:30   #
Patty
 
CDM wrote:
Bloomberg is a communist asshole with lots of money...money he made in this horrible capitalistic system banking system that he pisses on now that he has no need of it. He is terrified that he is irrelevant and desperate to control human activity...the grandest game there is...for wealthy cowards.

He is a liar in keeping with liberal communist progressive methodology. His singular goal and objective is to confiscate all guns from all people except the federal government. An impossible goal; because when the Federal government is the only legal gun owner...those with no respect for the law will be equally armed and the government will not know who they are.

The only difference between Bloomberg and Stalin...is a mustache. He is not an American.
Bloomberg is a communist asshole with lots of mone... (show quote)


:thumbup:

Reply
Apr 17, 2014 06:56:49   #
Patty
 
You two are both pathetic losers. Are you still paying your son to spend time with you?
Retired669 wrote:
Be careful Jon or you will get accused of stalking again.. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :thumbup:


:cry:

Reply
Apr 17, 2014 06:59:44   #
Retired669
 
Patty wrote:
You two are both pathetic losers. Are you still paying your son to spend time with you?

:cry:


I see you are stalking me looking for attention again? If I throw you a bone will you go away? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Apr 17, 2014 07:04:18   #
Patty
 
Here sweetie, let me explain this to you in a way even you will be able to understand.
I started the thread therefore it goes on my "watch" list. When you stalk other peoples threads then it goes on your "watch" list. If you need more assistance please click the "help" button up top.
Retired669 wrote:
I see you are stalking me looking for attention again? If I throw you a bone will you go away? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
 
 
Apr 17, 2014 07:32:15   #
Retired669
 
Patty wrote:
Here sweetie, let me explain this to you in a way even you will be able to understand.
I started the thread therefore it goes on my "watch" list. When you stalk other peoples threads then it goes on your "watch" list. If you need more assistance please click the "help" button up top.





You need to quit stalking Jon and myself looking for attention... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Apr 17, 2014 08:12:14   #
Patty
 
So my explanation was to advanced for you is what you're saying. I see. I should have known it would be since you are the person who gives us all a regular laugh by "thumbs upping" your own posts.
Retired669 wrote:
You need to quit stalking Jon and myself looking for attention... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Apr 17, 2014 08:37:58   #
Retired669
 
Patty wrote:
So my explanation was to advanced for you is what you're saying. I see. I should have known it would be since you are the person who gives us all a regular laugh by "thumbs upping" your own posts.




If you and many others were not so damn stupid you would realize the thumbs up are for those posts I agree with not for myself. I now see why you earned your 52 IQ. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Apr 17, 2014 08:41:22   #
Patty
 
So what you are saying is we can also include you laughing at your own posts. I see. I always love reducing the liberal to name calling. Its as good as a white flag. Thanks.
Retired669 wrote:
If you and many others were not so damn stupid you would realize the thumbs up are for those posts I agree with not for myself. I now see why you earned your 52 IQ. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
 
 
Apr 17, 2014 08:47:59   #
Retired669
 
Patty wrote:
So what you are saying is we can also include you laughing at your own posts. I see. I always love reducing the liberal to name calling. Its as good as a white flag. Thanks.




Those thumbs could also be saying F-Y to all you tea bagging dumbasses especially the ones full of conspiracies like yourself. Thanks for proving again why your IQ is only 52... :thumbup: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Apr 17, 2014 08:58:56   #
jay-are
 
Patty wrote:
So my explanation was to advanced for you is what you're saying. I see. I should have known it would be since you are the person who gives us all a regular laugh by "thumbs upping" your own posts.


You still haven't learned. The word is "TOO" - "TOO ADVANCED"

Reply
Apr 17, 2014 11:37:43   #
Patty
 
jay-are wrote:
You still haven't learned. The word is "TOO" - "TOO ADVANCED"


I thought I straightened you out on that yesterday?
Use "too" as a synonym for also before a verb. Usually, if you can replace "too" with "also" in the same sentence, and it still makes sense, then you are using it correctly.

Now write it 100 times so you don't forget it.

Reply
Apr 17, 2014 12:24:17   #
jonhatfield Loc: Green Bay, WI
 
Patty wrote:
I thought I straightened you out on that yesterday?
Use "too" as a synonym for also before a verb. Usually, if you can replace "too" with "also" in the same sentence, and it still makes sense, then you are using it correctly.

Now write it 100 times so you don't forget it.



Is that the English grammar they teach in Russia? You need to inform your teachers they don't know too much about 'too' and to delete the 'too' as a synonym for 'also' before a verb idiocy. Now, Patzers, why don't you tell us what 'too' before 'much' is a synonym for in the statement above? Clue...it's not exactly the same as 'too' in 'too much for a Russian propaganda operative to understand.'

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.