No Bias? Don’t believe this finding of no bias in the Trump, Russian investigation. The I. G. cannot report circumstantial evidence as if it’s an admission from a particular person.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Don’t believe this finding of no bias in the Trump, Russian investigation. The I. G. cannot report circumstantial evidence as if it’s an admission from a particular person.

Peter Strzok high up in the FBI at the time responded to his FBI lover, Lisa Page after she texted (Trumps) not ever going to become, President right? Right?

Strzok said No he won’t. We’ll stop it.

Nine days later after being put in charge he says We will stop it. How can anyone say that’s not biased?

moldyoldy

JFlorio wrote:

Don’t believe this finding of no bias in the Trump, Russian investigation. The I. G. cannot report circumstantial evidence as if it’s an admission from a particular person.

Peter Strzok high up in the FBI at the time responded to his FBI lover, Lisa Page after she texted (Trumps) not ever going to become, President right? Right?

Strzok said No he won’t. We’ll stop it.

Nine days later after being put in charge he says We will stop it. How can anyone say that’s not biased?

The comments that they made against the other side have been completely ignored. Their bias was against both sides, but they recognized that trump was a con man.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

JFlorio wrote:

Don’t believe this finding of no bias in the Trump, Russian investigation. The I. G. cannot report circumstantial evidence as if it’s an admission from a particular person.

Peter Strzok high up in the FBI at the time responded to his FBI lover, Lisa Page after she texted (Trumps) not ever going to become, President right? Right?

Strzok said No he won’t. We’ll stop it.

Nine days later after being put in charge he says We will stop it. How can anyone say that’s not biased?

We knew all along this would get white washed in the end for the big players involved..

The domino effect of one being charged would mean the other scum bags involved would have to be as well.. Can you just imagine them running for immunity and who their testimony would impact most..

Peter and Lisa are not out of the woods though... I understand they have turned it over to the DOJ for criminal charge review... The pegged lets use them as our way out....

debeda

lindajoy wrote:

We knew all along this would get white washed in t... (show quote)

Actually they, along with McCabe, will probably be the fall guys for the bigger fish.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

JFlorio wrote:

Don’t believe this finding of no bias in the Trump, Russian investigation. The I. G. cannot report circumstantial evidence as if it’s an admission from a particular person.

Peter Strzok high up in the FBI at the time responded to his FBI lover, Lisa Page after she texted (Trumps) not ever going to become, President right? Right?

Strzok said No he won’t. We’ll stop it.

Nine days later after being put in charge he says We will stop it. How can anyone say that’s not biased?

My question is, who is "we?"

http://www.louderwithcrowder.com/top-5-most-damning-revelations-for-the-fbi-in-the-ig-report/

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

moldyoldy wrote:

The comments that they made against the other side have been completely ignored. Their bias was against both sides, but they recognized that trump was a con man.

Let's see those comments against "the other side."

moldyoldy

nwtk2007 wrote:

Let's see those comments against "the other side."

Look it up, their texts were posted.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

moldyoldy wrote:

Look it up, their texts were posted.

In other words you don't know and there aren't any.

moldyoldy

lindajoy wrote:

We knew all along this would get white washed in t... (show quote)

There is no crime in having an opinion, several in trumps admin. think he is a moron or an idiot, I agree.

moldyoldy

nwtk2007 wrote:

In other words you don't know and there aren't any.

I have spent too much time getting links for those who then don't read them but instead criticize the source without seeing where the original story was sourced.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

moldyoldy wrote:

I have spent too much time getting links for those who then don't read them but instead criticize the source without seeing where the original story was sourced.

Then don't bring it up.

moldyoldy

nwtk2007 wrote:

Then don't bring it up.

You mean like the media ignoring trumps daily lies?

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

moldyoldy wrote:

You mean like the media ignoring trumps daily lies?

Are you kidding me? Trump can't sneeze with out the media doing hours on it calling it a lie.

moldyoldy

nwtk2007 wrote:

Are you kidding me? Trump can't sneeze with out the media doing hours on it calling it a lie.

Trump lies so much they can never keep up.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

moldyoldy wrote:

Trump lies so much they can never keep up.

He bloviates. That is much different than lying. Maybe the media should focus on what he is doing rather than each and every word he says. Hell, most of the time when the media is going on about something he's said, they, themselves are lying. Thus he tweets. He won't leave their biased lunacy go unchecked or responded to.