Interpreting Trump & Kim's Summit (Page 2): not being a political hack I'll just repeat what I said on another post mayhaps the meetings(and there will be a lot of them)will come to...

badbobby Loc: texas

slatten49 wrote:

Not after reading the following...

http://singaporepress.pbworks.com/w/page/11489262/companies

not being a political hack
I'll just repeat what I said on another post
mayhaps the meetings(and there will be a lot of them)will come to nothing
and then mayhaps the meetings will bring about denuclearlization of No Vietnam(and we can all sleep better)
this is certainly a fact Slat
'You have to start somewhere'

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

badbobby wrote:

not being a political hack
I'll just repeat what I said on another post
mayhaps the meetings(and there will be a lot of them)will come to nothing
and then mayhaps the meetings will bring about denuclearlization of No Vietnam(and we can all sleep better)
this is certainly a fact Slat
'You have to start somewhere'

I agree, my friend, but remain leery of any agreements with North Korea/Kim Jong Un...

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/dprkchron

Further, for the record, I chose The Straits Times because it seemed to be as distant from the U.S. media outlets as possible...and, on-site.

working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina

badbobby wrote:

does the word' Chinese' bother you at all??

Not Chinese. This is the original source: http://fivethirtyeight.com/politics/

It's a good article about the photo op versus substance. Maybe we'll get a Japanese and S. Korean reaction in the coming days. It was a great show, but where's the beef?

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

working class stiff wrote:

Not Chinese. This is the original source: http://fivethirtyeight.com/politics/

It's a good article about the photo op versus substance. Maybe we'll get a Japanese and S. Korean reaction in the coming days. It was a great show, but where's the beef?

Thanks, WCS.

I had forgotten the opening to my posting...

FiveThirtyEight, taken from The Straits Times

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-to-interpret-trump-and-kims-summit-in-singapore/

straightUp Loc: California

badbobby wrote:

seems to me that our President should be negotiating with you
since you profess to know veverything
the positive of this meeting is
you have to start somewhere
and I figgered that out for myself

I don't profess to know "everything", drama queen... But I know enough to realize that the "start" you want to give Trump credit for is the same "start" we had before Trump even took office. North Korea has been promising "denuclearization" for over 20 years.

Nothing has changed, except that where previous presidents had the substance not to play into Pyongyang's games, the Fool President fell right into it.

badbobby Loc: texas

straightUp wrote:

I don't profess to know "everything", drama queen... But I know enough to realize that the "start" you want to give Trump credit for is the same "start" we had before Trump even took office. North Korea has been promising "denuclearization" for over 20 years.

Nothing has changed, except that where previous presidents had the substance not to play into Pyongyang's games, the Fool President fell right into it.

I'll just agree to disagree

bahmer

badbobby wrote:

I'll just agree to disagree

Trump can show Kim how to set up great resorts on those fantastic beaches where many of his nations people can gain employment He can also reunite both North and South Korea and improve their farming abilities to give their people a better livelihood and help North and south Korea to prosper. Many possibilities exist for North Korea if it will only play ball with Trump.