Civil War – A few thoughts . . (Page 8): I responded to your post in Sandra Day O'Conner. Try and refute it. I found you had several errors. Comparing the 42 rules of the Egyptian...

Endoscopy Loc: Florida

PeterS wrote:

I answered your question on page 10 of Sandra Day O'Conner on Separation of Church and State. I thought you disappeared. If you are going to challenge people to answer your questions why then do you refuse to answer them.

Also, if you do decide to answer I am going in the hospital tomorrow and will be there about a week so will answer when I get back. If you hadn't disappeared we could have settled this long ago...

I responded to your post in Sandra Day O'Conner. Try and refute it. I found you had several errors. Comparing the 42 rules of the Egyptian Maat to the 66 books of the Bible was ludicrous. Here is the listing of the books of the Bible you to which you compared the 42 rules of Maat which are to be obeyed by the dead. Are you really that ignorant about what the Bible contains. It became painfully obvious you were arguing in ignorance!!

Genres in the Bible
Among the generally recognized genres and categorizations of the Bible are the following (note that other systems and classifications have also been advanced):

Historical narrative/epic: Genesis and the first half of Exodus, Numbers, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1 and 2 Samuel, 1 and 2 Kings, 1 and 2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Jonah, and possibly Acts

The Law: the last half of Exodus; also Leviticus, Deuteronomy
Wisdom: Job, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes
Psalms: Psalms, Song of Solomon, Lamentations

Prophecy: Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi

Apocalyptic: Daniel, Revelation

Gospel: Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and possibly Acts

Epistle (letter): Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 and 2 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon, Hebrews, James, 1 and 2 Peter, 1, 2, and 3 John, Jude

Endoscopy Loc: Florida

PeterS wrote:

There is nothing Mueller can do that will remove Trump from office. Suppose the worst comes to play and you cons lose the house. So even with a democrat majority any impeachment will have to go through the senate and there it will take 60 votes to confirm. Since Republicans are expected to hold the senate even if impeached there is no way to confirm so Mueller's job can't be to get Trump out of office simply because it can't be done--not without significant help from you cons!

So far with digging furiously he has an empty hole. In other words much ado about nothing. Why do you libs think there was something?? In the 60s there was not the vitriol that the liberals of today push out. Why the change. Fallacious ad hominem attacks constantly.

Ricktloml

debeda wrote:

If what's going on is what proglibs consider "whining" I'd hate to see shrieking and howling and growling and ranting and melting down. I guess conservatives are more like Canadians. We tend to use our words rather than a 2 year old tantrum...

What the left calls "whining" is actually people getting fed up with the lies corruption and abuse of power that has been going on for decades but became blatant in the Obama administration, as well as the blatant abusive bias of the media. The left's nose is out of joint because those on the right have finally started demanding accountability and fighting back against all this corruption and abuse of power. How DARE anyone point out the underhanded methods and radical left-wing policies endemic in the Democrat Party, (these same policies are remarkably totalitarian in nature and unconstitutional,) AND expose the media for covering for, excusing, defending, misinforming, REFUSING to inform and outright lying to protect and promote leftists and their agenda. It has gone way beyond whining. Those on the right KNOW they can no longer expect the left, (the Democrat Party, Hollywood, academia, and the media,) to EVER be honest about their goals, to tell the truth about ANYTHING or to be trusted in any way, and they are not going to sit still and let these anti-American bullies ruin the country with collectivism, (as EVERY country that has adopted or in most cases been FORCED to live with these policies has eventually found out.) So when leftists start telling us to stop whining , what they really mean is sit down, shut up, and just let us walk all over you and the Constitution. No thanks!

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Ricktloml wrote:

What the left calls "whining" is actuall... (show quote)

You sure have a twisted view of our policies..

debeda

Ricktloml wrote:

What the left calls "whining" is actuall... (show quote)

Agreed!! The proglibs say they're patriotic and work within the law but as you've just said so well and we've all seen that's a crock.

old marine Loc: America home of the brave

permafrost wrote:

You sure have a twisted view of our policies..

The naked truth sometime hurts.

Ricktloml

old marine wrote:

The naked truth sometime hurts.

It is the policies that are twisted, not conservative views about them

Steve700

working class stiff wrote:

Satan begone.

It's good to now that you understand how violently and utterly crushed you got on that one. Crying out for Satan to leave you and be gone, can only work for you by 1st realizing your error, as you rebuke him in the name of Jesus, while feeling heartily sorry for your transgressions and then asking Jesus to come into your heart as you accept him as your Lord and Savior. Until then, you will remain just a pathetically lost soul. And keep in mind that These Words Are Be Taken Seriously as they are coming from a guy who's prime values are Truth, Honesty & Integrity and that believes that the truth must come 1st, Last & Always. Like I said, there Can Be No Goodness Without Truth. (Be sure to read Ricktloml's Post, 5 post above this one.)
.

Like I have repeatedly told you, you can say nothing coming from that demented mind and your left-wing ideology that I can't turn around on you and prove as false, fraudulent nonsense. Your statement hardly made sense in view of the words I spoke.

Therefore you would be wise to not give me any more of your silly guff and just zip up that pie hole when I am trying to educate you with truth and reality that you liberals, in your unknowing degenerate state, just aren't getting on your own

Steve700

working class stiff wrote:

Satan begone.

permafrost wrote:

You sure have a twisted view of our policies..

A Couple of Demented Willfully Blind Idiots, Unknowingly Afflicted with Truth & Reality Avoidance Disorder, Defiant Opposition Disorder and An Immunity to Education. That's what we've got here.

Endoscopy Loc: Florida

permafrost wrote:

You sure have a twisted view of our policies..

Obama Care was created by a Democrat legislative group getting together with the presidents staff and writing the bill. Then using parliamentary tricks only allowed an up or down vote in both houses with no amendments allowed.

As you were saying!!!!

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Endoscopy wrote:

Obama Care was created by a Democrat legislative group getting together with the presidents staff and writing the bill. Then using parliamentary tricks only allowed an up or down vote in both houses with no amendments allowed.

As you were saying!!!!

You had best review the history... It took 2 years to pass the ACA.. 170 inputs from Republicans.. After all that do really think parliamentary tricks were used??

debeda

permafrost wrote:

You had best review the history... It took 2 years to pass the ACA.. 170 inputs from Republicans.. After all that do really think parliamentary tricks were used??

Why yes I do. The only reason it was passed was because it was considered a "tax" due to having fines for noncompliance. I think the democrats have done some good things over the years. But today's democratic party is WAY off base with what most logical Americans need and want. In fact, I would call them delusional and out of touch with what Joe and Jane America need and want, regardless of what the shriek and howl about.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

debeda wrote:

Why yes I do. The only reason it was passed was because it was considered a "tax" due to having fines for noncompliance. I think the democrats have done some good things over the years. But today's democratic party is WAY off base with what most logical Americans need and want. In fact, I would call them delusional and out of touch with what Joe and Jane America need and want, regardless of what the shriek and howl about.

the "tax" reference must be from the SC when so much was made of the decision changing the wording from "fine" or something like that...

It was not used to pass the bill..

I would say you are correct that the democrat party has changed over the years..

However, I think the republican party has change even more..

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

permafrost wrote:

You had best review the history... It took 2 years to pass the ACA.. 170 inputs from Republicans.. After all that do really think parliamentary tricks were used??

How many Republicans voted for the obammy care.

Endoscopy Loc: Florida

permafrost wrote:

You had best review the history... It took 2 years to pass the ACA.. 170 inputs from Republicans.. After all that do really think parliamentary tricks were used??

I lived through it and was watching CSPAN at the time. Absolutely no amendment passed. It was a totally Democrat controlled congress. The Republicans were complaining bitterly about nothing from their side was allowed. That only happened in the House!!! The Senate had different rules and the party in control has more power.