Manning345 wrote:
The NWO affecrtionados fail to understand how adding a whole level of government to the world does not decrease the problems we have, but rather increases it tenfold. The UN is ineffective in general because it has no power to enforce its will on the members, only toothless edicts various nations use to their benefit. For the US we would have city/county, state, national, and world government to contend with. It is not easy to pass a law at the city/county level, and the difficulties and oppositions grow as you rise up each level.
Enforcement becomes a super task, especially when one law most of the time doesn't fit all situations around the world. Plus the time to fix a problem would double or triple if it ever gets a fix. So instead of having a few nations in conflict, we would have many conflicts for the world government to solve, with a net loss in just about every category you can think of. Rebel groups of all sorts would emerge to bring down the world order, or at least to defy it.
If you look into the 65 or so Islamic nations and the main sects---Sunni and Shiite-- they have been fighting each other for centuries, and they would look upon a world government as the biggest enemy they could ever have, unless they ran it, and it might just unite them long enough to defeat the NWO, a little bit at a time. It would be a running conflict forever.
If you think "share and share alike" would be the order of the day, you would be going against a whole tier of nations not willing to give up their wealth by force to have it given to the poorer nations, flattening out the misery across the board.
Issue after issue that we as a nation face would likewise be faced many fold by the NWO, making the NWO play whack-a-mole forever.
Today, such a NWO is at the least impractical, and at the most it would be immoral.
The NWO affecrtionados fail to understand how addi... (
show quote)
Where you get this adding on.
It is already there.
It is becoming more complete every day. those that want it will push to get the people to adopt it in fear or just go along with it.
It is our choice:
Do we give in to fear or others that would harm us ^ go to war.
Or do we juist agree.
We have no real choice.
They will play with our emotions until we agree or just keep making inroads on the path the World is on.
They wish to hold the treat of war over us to make it seem we need what they want.
They all ready have what they want they want us to agree that we need them.
It has gone past the time that we need them
It is them that need us they want us to agree with what they want.
I say that puts us in a good postion to bargin with them.
Individuly or collectively.
Just takwe note of who is aposed to the average person being orgaized.
I say in the long run we need to present ourr self as individuals.
The greatest fear in the World is with those with the most losing control over the masses.
The worst way for that to work for them is to treat us all as individuals.
That won't set well with many be cause would elevate the masses to their level.
While just being a face less member of the masses can be looked at as subhumans.
Those that are there to be exploited.
Individuals deserve dignity & trust & you can't exploite individuals.
Just stop & figure out just where you really stand in the world around you.
I say being part of the masses in the eyes of the few includes far more than most people care to look at.
I say there are many in that group drinking the kool-aid.