Several years ago I had a conversation with a friend that I had not seen for a while, about “current events” in America. During the conversation he looked at me with a very serious look on his face and said, “How did we get to this place in America”? At the time there were many different answers to that question. Now I have a different version of that question and it is, “How did so many Americans get to a point where they openly hate America so badly”? No matter how hard I try to understand the ”other side’s” views, I cannot. At times I have even tried to give some of these people the “benefit of doubt” and say to myself that they do not really hate America. They are just being shallow and self-serving, and they simply have not thought about the actual consequences of their actions. But, then I remind myself that regardless of WHY they say and do the things that they do, they are not rational or reasonable, and they are helping the “One World Order” movement destroy America.

Here are a few recent examples of “Anti-American” activity:

• The Democrats and the MSM have been absolutely disgusting in their attacks on President Trump’s 3:00 A.M. meeting with the three Americans who were released from North Korean prisons. The disgusting public ridicule continued for several days. President Trump arranged their release, did not give North Korea anything for their release and gave up his night’s sleep to greet them when they arrived back in America. Compare this to Obama’s Bowe Bergdahl TRADE! Obama traded five of the world’s worst terrorist for Bowe, a deserter and traitor, and held a Rose Garden press conference to brag about it without a single negative word from the MSM.
• The Democrats and MSM are now claiming that General Kelly says bad things about president Trump behind his back. Saying this about a man with General Kelly’s record of service to America and the sacrifices he has made in that service is beyond disgusting. They originally said this about Secretary Tillerson but now that he is out of Government service they are repeating the disgusting lie with a new target that is close to President Trump. It seems like the “Trump haters” have made up and told so many outright lies that they are now repeating some of them over and over again.
• The Democrats are leading twelve different “investigations” about alleged misconduct by Scott Pruitt, the current head of the EPA. This is just like the alleged Trump campaign Russia collusion. If you have a “public microphone” then making unfounded accusations is all you need to attempt to destroy anyone that you do not agree with, regardless of the consequences to America.
• When President Trump’s transition team began to interact with people in positions of authority in other countries, as they prepared to be part of President Trump’s Administration, they were viciously attacked for their actions by Democrats, the MSM and members of the departing Obama Administration. But now that John Kerry is blatantly, and illegally, talking with leaders of other countries against President Trump’s decision to pull out of the ridiculous Iran nuclear deal the Democrats and MSM are referring to it as “shadow diplomacy”.
• The Trump Administration worked quietly with Iraqi intelligence operatives to put together a sting operation that resulted in the capture of five senior ISIS officers. There was not a single mention about this by anyone on any MSM network.
• The National Department of Education had a 2018 fiscal year proposed budget of 193.1 BILLION dollars. Betsy Devos, the Secretary of Education proposed a tiny budget cut, two billion dollars. Congress overrode her proposal and increased the budget by nine BILLION dollars! Congress increased the budget for a bloated federal agency that should not even exist!

As I said earlier, anytime I try and give anyone in the “Washington Cesspool” the “benefit of doubt” regarding why they say or do what they do, I have to stop and remind myself that “why” does not really matter. All that really matters is that they are deliberately hurting America on a constant basis and this must stop. If we do not keep President Trump in the White House, and control of the U.S House of Representatives and Senate on November 6, 2018, the future of America is dim. Patriotic Americans must continue to stand up and be heard, and VOTE!

=================
Why many Americans especially the women and millennials suddenly hate America? During the 8-year reign of Obama, he changed our country to political correctness by replacing our constitution. Obama was trained by a Saul Alinsky style, “The Rules for Radicals” when in Chicago. That style he did not waste, putting to work during his 8-year reign at the White House.

Then he started the Obamacare in 2009, took the $716 billion from Medicare to initially fund the Obamacare. Secretly seniors pay for that. Their Medicare premium increased, and the SS decreased. That affected only the higher SS recipients.

Then he allowed tens of millions of illegal aliens into the US from Mexico, South and Central American countries. He allowed millions of Muslims. There was rapid increase of MS13 gang members, and ISIS terrorists. Drug dealers from Mexico became very powerful and rampant. Many Sanctuary Cities allowed to shelter these criminals.

He allowed hundreds of thousands of Muslim refugees. Included were Muslim terrorists and ISIS disguised as refugees. But Christian refugees were not allowed by Obama to come to the US. In fact, he sent back 28 Christian refugees to the Middle East, but were killed by ISIS as soon as they returned.

The SEIU labor union teachers and school administration, required indoctrination of kids in public schools. They were required to learn Islam and recite that Allah is the only god. When kids prayed to Jesus, or carry Christian materials and books, the kids were removed from schools or suspended. The reason for that was separation of church and state.

Muslim kids were also allowed time for their prayers, during class.
During Obama era, more than 46 million households were in Food Stamps. More than 51% households did not pay federal income tax.
He used taxpayer’s money to fund the illegals with the annual cost of $116,000 billion.

After running out of fund for Obama care, he raised the premiums of the high-income taxpayers. He also raided in 2013, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac $126 billion to continue funding the Obamacare. That money taken belong to private stockholders.

Then those millennials in colleges and universities were taught by liberal and progressive professors hating the constitution, and the democratic form of our government. Now they are mostly Godless progressives. These liberal professors are coming from various ethnic groups, blacks, Muslims, and white progressives.

With wide open borders millions of illegal aliens continue to pour into our country.

MSM started tearing apart statues of the Founders and especially Gen. Lee of West Virginia, who was one of the best generals that ever lived.

Then NFL professional players started doing their knees without regard and respect when the National Anthem was played before the game.

Hillary Clinton promised Muslims entries of 550% increase every year to the US, in exchange for hundreds of millions of dollars for her Foundation, and campaign contributions.

And finally women hate because their candidate crooked Hillary did not win, despite that she spent more than $2 billion for her political campaign, in addition to the Dossier and the FISA Court warrant.

"Control freaks" hate anything that stands in the way of their quest for control; those that have been brainwashed with Marxist philosophy, that we call "leftist," "globalist," "progressives" and "liberals" all believe that "the end justifies their means." Those that stand for the rule of law are "conservatives," a label programmed into their minds to "hate" because they stand in the way of their chosen means (to break the law) to control. When they are put into a corner with self-evident truth their favorite retort is, "Let's have a conversation." They cannot admit to "self-evident truth." For example, when a lefty says he want open borders and you tell him/her that it is necessary to lock your doors when you leave your house, they react with, "It's complicated." They are their own god and they make the rules; their rules require your death if you are seen as a "conservative" in their eyes. In their eyes the ones who are oppressed are the ones who suffer the consequences for breaking the Law; they will always side with law-breakers. In their eyes they will see themselves as the "good people" who stand for "peace." Yet, by urging and encouraging others to break the law they are really war-mongers. The very thing they tell us they want is just the opposite of what will happen if they implement it from a power position. One of the suppositions lodged in their world view is the concept of "moral equivalence."

Below are the investigations into Pruitt. Not a single one is headed by the democrats.

Travel
The EPA’s inspector general, an internal watchdog, is auditing Pruitt’s travel, amid questions about frequent trips to his home state of Oklahoma at taxpayer expense and his reliance on first-class seats on commercial airplanes. This line of inquiry has twice been expanded to cover a longer time frame. The current window, through the end of 2017, permits scrutiny of Pruitt’s December trip to Morocco to promote U.S. liquefied natural gas.
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is scrutinizing Pruitt’s frequent first-class seats, marking House Republicans’ first formal investigation of a member of Trump’s cabinet. The panel broadened its investigation in April to seek more information about Pruitt’s trips to Morocco and Italy, the administrator’s security protection and his lease of a Capitol Hill condominium from a lobbyist. The Republican chairman also is asking for transcribed interviews with five key EPA aides.

Security
The EPA inspector general is probing Pruitt’s round-the-clock security protection, including the possibility that bodyguards accompanied him on trips to Disneyland and the Rose Bowl.
Separately, the inspector general is auditing the administrator’s protective service detail in response to an anonymous complaint lodged before Pruitt was nominated. In September, the inspector general released an interim report saying it had discovered an unauthorized $23,413 pay adjustment for an unnamed agent.
The inspector general says it is conducting preliminary research on how the EPA’s criminal enforcement office reports "availability pay" awarded to officers who frequently work extra, unscheduled time beyond their regular workdays.

Spending
The Government Accountability Office already concluded the EPA violated an appropriations law by failing to give Congress advance notification about plans to spend more than $43,000 installing a secure phone booth in Pruitt’s office. The GAO said the EPA ran afoul of another law, the Antideficiency Act, by effectively spending government funds that hadn’t yet been appropriated or exceeded the appropriate amount. Federal employees who violate the law are subject to suspension from duty without pay or removal from office, as well as fines and imprisonment.

The White House Office of Management and Budget is examining the purchase of that soundproof phone booth, which morphed from a no-more-than $13,500 project into a $43,000 booth with silenced ventilation and "noise-lock" paneling.

$50 Condo Rental
The EPA’s inspector general is probing Pruitt’s rental of a Capitol Hill bedroom from a lobbyist under favorable terms that allowed him to pay $50 per day -- just for the days used. The U.S. government’s top ethics official had prodded the IG to launch the inquiry.

Pay Raises
The EPA inspector general is studying how Pruitt’s office used special legal authority to fill up to 30 "administratively determined" positions and award pay raises to some political appointees. Two of Pruitt’s top aides were given raises worth tens of thousands of dollars over White House objections, using special authority under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The authority, which has been used by Pruitt’s predecessors, enables EPA administrators to swiftly bring on staff. Documents released as part of an interim report April 16 showed that Pruitt’s chief of staff, Ryan Jackson, authorized the salary increases.

Lobbying
The GAO is examining whether the EPA violated lobbying laws because of Pruitt’s appearance in a video describing his opposition to a rule on water pollution enacted under former President Barack Obama. The National Cattleman’s Beef Association video urges ranchers to file public comments on the rule the EPA is now rewriting and features Pruitt explaining the importance of that input. House Democrats, including Representative Frank Pallone of New Jersey, said Pruitt’s involvement in the video could run afoul of federal laws barring the use of taxpayer dollars for lobbying or propaganda purposes.

The EPA inspector general is compiling information about a meeting Pruitt had with the National Mining Association in April 2017, following a report the administrator urged the coal group to encourage Trump to pull the U.S. from the Paris climate agreement. Pallone and other critics said that if true, Pruitt’s prodding would violate lobbying laws. Inspector General Arthur Elkins Jr. told Pallone he could submit the complied factual record to the GAO to investigate potential legal violations.

The rest of your tripe isn't worth commenting on...

Trump isn’t going anywhere, and your distortion is seen as just that!! How many times has your own ilk heard and read Mueller is not indicting Trump, Mueller is not investigating Trump etc!!

You people read the truth but never ever give concession that President Trump just may not be what’s portrayed of him by your lyen fake news media outlets..

You should really try thinking for yourself rather than reciting the propaganda BS..

All they get to do is write a report," said Giuliani.

Giuliani, himself a former federal prosecutor and mayor of New York City, also told Fox that Mueller's investigators have not responded to five information requests from the president's team. That has forced Trump's legal team to push off making a decision about whether the president will sit for an interview with the special counsel -- a decision they had hoped to reach by Thursday.

Federal prosecutors are barred from indicting a sitting president, as laid out in a Justice Department memo. Giuliani says that Mueller has no choice but to follow its guidance....

Giuliani joined Trump's legal team last month and has repeatedly warned that an in-person interview of the president by the special counsel's team would constitute a "perjury trap." Complicating matters, Trump himself has refused to rule out agreeing to an interview with Mueller.

In an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity earlier this month, Giuliani said that the Mueller team had ruled out allowing the Trump team to submit written answers to the special counsel's questions.

Giuliani said last week that the president's legal team would oppose any subpoena unless they could "reach agreement on the ground rules." He argued that Trump could invoke executive privilege, and the team would point to Justice Department opinions in fighting a subpoena and "on both law and the facts, we would have the strongest case you could imagine."-Fox News


Giuliani has pointed to the fact that the Trump team has handed over 1.2 million documents to Mueller as evidence of cooperation with the probe - which marks its one-year anniversary on Thursday.

So far, Mueller's probe has resulted in the resignation of National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, the arrests of Paul Manafort and Rick Gates, and the indictment of 13 Russian nationals on allegations of hacking the 2016 election - along with the raid of Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen.

Earlier this month, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein - who is officially in charge of the Russia investigation - admitted that Trump can't be indicted.

"The Department of Justice has in the past, when the issue arose, has opined that a sitting President cannot be indicted," Rosenstein said. "There's been a lot of speculation in the media about this, I just don't have anything more to say about it."

In a series of memorandums, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel concluded that indicting a sitting president would violate the Constitution by undermining his ability to do his job. Those memos, too, though, said the answer was a matter of structure and inference.

The Justice Department’s regulations require Mr. Mueller, the special counsel, to follow the department’s “rules, regulations, procedures, practices and policies.” If the memos bind Mr. Mueller, it would seem he could not indict Mr. Trump, no matter what he uncovered.-NYT

No American court has ever addressed the matter, however elements of the issue were argued before the Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon in a 1974 case in which Richard Nixon was forced to comply with a subpoena from special counsel Lee Jaworski during the Watergate investigation, however the issue of indictment was not ruled on.

"This case is essentially over," Giuliani said. "They're just in denial..

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-16/mueller-says-he-wont-indict-trump-giuliani
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 3157 next>>