The End is Nigh: Ten Reasons Why
Apr 25, 2018 10:46:31 #
out of the woods wrote:
She's out there, very elaborate psychotic delusions, and has given herself over to possession. Hers is a landscape I very much don't wish to visit. Twisted truth.
Amen and Amen Abraham Lincoln said this “He who represents himself has a fool for a client” So the same cane be said for susanblange as she has her own version of how to be saved and who is who in the bible interpreted by her. Truly sad indeed. So for susan one could say "She who interprets the bible for herself has a fool for a student"
Apr 25, 2018 11:21:33 #
mwdegutis wrote:
b The End is Nigh: Ten Reasons Why /b I (contin... (show quote)
Oh lordy. More "end times" nonsense. You should talk to the JWs; their "end times" was supposed to happen in 1914; then in 1925; then in 1975; then Family Radio announced the end of the "church age" in 1988, and the "end" was certainly going to happen in May, 2008; then again in October 2008.
So what's the next projection?
Apr 25, 2018 11:24:09 #
bahmer wrote:
The Lord knows the day and the hour. Not the angels and not even the Son knew the day and the hour...
Hmm... I thought the Son was co-equal with the Father. How is it that the Son is evidently out of the loop?
Apr 25, 2018 11:26:56 #
kemmer wrote:
Oh lordy. More "end times" nonsense. You should talk to the JWs; their "end times" was supposed to happen in 1914; than in 1925; then in 1975; then Family Radio announced the end of the "church age" in 1988, and the "end" was certainly going to happen in May, 2008; then again in October 2008.
So what's the next projection?
So what's the next projection?
To you it is nonsense to the believer it is fact and hope in our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. If you notice we are not predicting the day and/or hour we are only looking at the world in general and comparing that image to what the scriptures tell us it will be when the Lord returns is all. Even Jesus said in his earthly ministry that he didn't know and the angels didn't know only his father which was in heaven knew the day and the hour of his return. Now does that satisfy you?
Apr 25, 2018 11:27:04 #
PLT Sarge wrote:
I would highly recommend that you get the book by Dr. David Jeremiah. "Escape the coming Night". This is a lesson in Revelation. His insight opens the door to true understanding. In this book you will discover who the two prophets are. One is repentance, the other is the law. Revelation is the only book of the Bible that says the reader, student, seeker of the truth will be blessed. The reason, you can not read Revelation without reading the whole Gospel.
Unfortunately, only a minority of the Church Fathers at Nicaea voted to exclude Revelation from the canon as being too esoteric, and frankly weird.
Apr 25, 2018 11:33:56 #
bahmer wrote:
To you it is nonsense to the believer it is fact and hope in our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. If you notice we are not predicting the day and/or hour we are only looking at the world in general and comparing that image to what the scriptures tell us it will be when the Lord returns is all. Even Jesus said in his earthly ministry that he didn't know and the angels didn't know only his father which was in heaven knew the day and the hour of his return. Now does that satisfy you?
No. Then what's all this noise about "signs" that the "end times" are upon us? Redhots have been saying that for centuries. The cathedrals and churches were jammed on Dec. 31, 999, because everyone thought the jig was up at midnight.
Apr 25, 2018 11:34:10 #
kemmer wrote:
Unfortunately, only a minority of the Church Fathers at Nicaea voted to exclude Revelation from the canon as being too esoteric, and frankly weird.
That was in 325 A.D. correct?
Apr 25, 2018 11:35:05 #
Apr 25, 2018 11:38:41 #
kemmer wrote:
Give or take.
I believe that is before the catholic church fully got its teeth into it then but not sure. I am not that much of a buff on church history I know what I believe and that is it.
Apr 25, 2018 11:42:17 #
kemmer wrote:
Unfortunately, only a minority of the Church Fathers at Nicaea voted to exclude Revelation from the canon as being too esoteric, and frankly weird.
The books of Daniel and Ezekiel gio a long with Revelation as well and they are old testament books and I believe that there are more but it has been a long time ago that I took the class on Revelation.
Apr 25, 2018 11:42:33 #
bahmer wrote:
I believe that is before the catholic church fully got its teeth into it then but not sure. I am not that much of a buff on church history I know what I believe and that is it.
There wasn't really a "Catholic" church till the East broke away in 1053. It was all the CHRISTIAN church.
Apr 25, 2018 11:44:41 #
kemmer wrote:
There wasn't really a "Catholic" church till the East broke away in 1053. It was all the CHRISTIAN church.
If you say so because church history is not my forte.
Apr 25, 2018 11:47:30 #
bahmer wrote:
If you say so because church history is not my forte.
In 1053 the pope in Rome, and the patriarch in Constantinople excommunicated each other, and things went from bad to worse.
Paul VI and Partriarch Anthenagoras lifted the mutual excommunications, and everything got better.
Apr 25, 2018 11:52:59 #
kemmer wrote:
In 1053 the pope in Rome, and the patriarch in Constantinople excommunicated each other, and things went from bad to worse.
Paul VI and Partriarch Anthenagoras lifted the mutual excommunications, and everything got better.
Paul VI and Partriarch Anthenagoras lifted the mutual excommunications, and everything got better.
Are you a practicing catholic?
Apr 25, 2018 11:57:13 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.