king hall wrote:
The answer is YES! And here's why;
the code of regulations, be it State or Federal, defines in clear language crime and penalty. Nowhere is the mention of loss of civil liberties which may include; voting, firearm ownership/possession, employment, travel, public housing, parent & or grandparent rights (talk about natural rights). A defendant cannot defend against such loss nor, in the case of a plea bargain, is a defendant allowed to include 'sovereignty of rights'. The loss of one's rights is strictly an 'enhancement to sentencing' as presented to the 'sentencing court' by the prosecutor.
None of this is 'in law' but is REGULATION determined and delivered by America's court system and the judges that operate it. However, it is blessed by our Congress. (as is; 'it's ok for the FBI to lie to us)
Ladies & Gentlemen, solely because of the abuse of our penal system, special interest groups, (believe it or not, Christian based) non-elected regulatory bodies creating law, regardless of the crime of question, loss of one's civil liberties beyond a penalty prescribed and paid should never be considered; otherwise we are just pretending to live in a free society. Thanks for listening
(next week PR ask about "property taxes & zoning")
The answer is YES! And here's why; br the code of... (
show quote)
Somebody who gets it. Amazing!