Who votes and how,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,? We argue a lot in this country about voting, voting rights, and the entire voting process. So what do you think the process should entail?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

We argue a lot in this country about voting, voting rights, and the entire voting process. So what do you think the process should entail?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

JFlorio wrote:

We argue a lot in this country about voting, voting rights, and the entire voting process. So what do you think the process should entail?

O.K. I’ll go first.

1). No early voting except for 70 and older, disabled, and military.
2). Paper ballots. (English only)
3). Photo I. D., such as drivers license. No exceptions.
4). Election Day, to be declared a national holiday. No excuses to not be able to get off work and vote.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

JFlorio wrote:

We argue a lot in this country about voting, voting rights, and the entire voting process. So what do you think the process should entail?

It is quite simple really. In order to vote, you must first be a US Citizen. Second, you should be required to prove you are a US Citizen. Third, the integrity of the voting process must be able to be audited and verified. The whole concept of electronic voting without the ability to establish an audit trail leaves the system open to tampering, hacking, and distrust in the system. Fourth, and in relation to point #3, the voter's picture should be taken, and or a fingerprint matched to the voting entry to insure that any attempt to cast an illegal vote could easily be prosecuted.

Now let's see the howl of protests from the left claiming that there is no problem with illegal voting, and that all these suggestions are simply a means to disenfranchise the left, and minority voters.

Oh, and BTW, you can get a clear idea how many feel on this subject by searching OPP for "Illegal Voting", and this is the result you will get.

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/search-topic-list?q=illegal+voting&sectnum=0&username=

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

JFlorio wrote:

O.K. I’ll go first.

1). No early voting except for 70 and older, disabled, and military.
2). Paper ballots. (English only)
3). Photo I. D., such as drivers license. No exceptions.
4). Election Day, to be declared a national holiday. No excuses to not be able to get off work and vote.

I like your 4 points.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Damn. You nailed it. I actually didn’t say proof of citizenship because I was thinking in the obvious and past. Times have changed. Good catch.

ACP45 wrote:

It is quite simple really. In order to vote, you m... (show quote)

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

JFlorio wrote:

O.K. I’ll go first.

1). No early voting except for 70 and older, disabled, and military.
2). Paper ballots. (English only)
3). Photo I. D., such as drivers license. No exceptions.
4). Election Day, to be declared a national holiday. No excuses to not be able to get off work and vote.

I like all except #3 Cailf and IL are two states that I of that give illegals drivers licenses !

debeda

4430 wrote:

I like all except #3 Cailf and IL are two states that I of that give illegals drivers licenses !

Yep and notice who were the blue states. In Illinois basically the whole state was red except 3 or 4 counties going blue. Of course one of those counties was cook, which contains Chicago the home of voter fraud and patronage. Screwed the whole state, as usual. Ugh so sick of it. I never could understand any LEGAL rationale behind the whole no ID required to vote. Serves no purpose that I can see other than to create ease of fraud.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

I agree. would have ot be a certain designation on the license specifying that you are a citizen.

4430 wrote:

I like all except #3 Cailf and IL are two states that I of that give illegals drivers licenses !

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

JFlorio wrote:

I agree. would have ot be a certain designation on the license specifying that you are a citizen.

However the Libs would not stand for that !

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Wonder what their excuse would be this time? I know, "colored" ink is racist.

4430 wrote:

However the Libs would not stand for that !

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

JFlorio wrote:

Wonder what their excuse would be this time? I know, "colored" ink is racist.

EN Submarine Qualified Loc: Wisconsin East coast

JFlorio wrote:

We argue a lot in this country about voting, voting rights, and the entire voting process. So what do you think the process should entail?

Agree totally with your listing below.
Question. How can reasonable people criticize a system which should first and foremost verify the validity of the voter?

debeda

EN Submarine Qualified wrote:

Agree totally with your listing below.
Question. How can reasonable people criticize a system which should first and foremost verify the validity of the voter?

Cuz some people like to make it easy to cheat

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

debeda wrote:

Cuz some people like to make it easy to cheat

Notice that no lefties have made comments. Strange, isn't it?

EN Submarine Qualified Loc: Wisconsin East coast

mwdegutis wrote:

Notice that no lefties have made comments. Strange, isn't it?

No. Quite expected, I'd say.

I can't imagine why the (R) presidents, Reagan, or the Bushes didn't have the moxie to begin this national overhaul. It has been sorely needed since Eisenhower.

Maybe they were emasculated or scared of the Dems.

God bless you Mr. Trump and I wish you the most success in all you are attempting.