ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

Gorsuch matters. Read this to understand how much he really does matter. VERY SHORT READ. We need more of these type of decisions.Gorsuch matters!

Neil Gorsuch has only been on the
Supreme Court for a short while. Recently he ignited the
fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he
refused to join the SCOTUS "cert pool."

The cert pool was established in 1973
during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to
efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each
term. In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the
Court's law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the
justices recommending a grant or denial. The obvious problem
here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the
law clerks instead of the Justices. It also, in theory,
allows 3rd parties to unfairly influence a case through the
clerks.

That is NOT how the Supreme Court was
designed to operate. Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his
foot down in the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to
pass off judgments to the discretion of legal clerks. This
is the kind of story everyone should be hearing or reading
in the media, but obviously is not.

Today the United States Supreme Court
issued a direct and final blow to the Islamic Indoctrination
of our young in this nation.

The full panel of the United States
Supreme Court which consists of 9 judges met to decide the
fate of Islamic indoctrination in our American public
schools. In a typical 5 X 4 decision, common sense won out,
and we have sanity restored to our schools once again.

The United States Supreme Court was
able to hand out this decision banning Sharia Law and Islam
from being taught in classrooms because of the tie-breaking
vote of the newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil
Gorsuch.

Gorsuch went on to write about the
decision:

"The government certainly has no
business being involved in religion, but this isn't a
government issue or a religious issue. This is about the
judicial branch interpreting the laws as they apply to the
teaching of religion. We shouldn't be teaching any religions
in the public schools of this country
Amen, Justice Gorsuch, Amen!

Liberals are all about teaching Islam
and Sharia Law but they also have issues with "Under God" in
the pledge of allegiance and "In God We Trust" on our
currency. This should have been a unanimous decision, not 5
to 4, but it seems like the 4 liberal judges on the Supreme
Court don't care about the Constitution, nor our values.

Perhaps this is the start of restoring
America to its founding glory. Thank GOD for our new Supreme
Court Justice Neil Gorsuch--- a great selection by President
Trump. Truth Has no Agenda!

woodguru

Of course he matters...

But can you imagine the wailing and hair pulling that would take place if during Trump's last full year Trump needs to replace a supreme court justice, and dems being in power say no way, we need to wait until the election so that the people can speak?

That doesn't even stretch the imagination of people who don't have imaginations, the right would have been ready to overthrow the government if that exact thing were to be tried by Dems.

So what is it that's different about the GOP doing this and dems doing it? It is an interesting question, and most will refuse to try to explain that one, it has no explanation that republicans could clarify. They never thought Obama was a legitimate president. Dems could say the same thing, that Trump stole the election so he can't appoint a supreme court justice during his last year. Precedents mean something, and dems would have every right to go there. Of course the GOP wouldn't see anything fair about it.

woodguru

Now the question is can you see and do you know that Gorsuch is not an unbiased judge? He comes with a hard conservative bias.

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

woodie: So you can't stand the fact the conservative constructionism is the only way to go in rule of law? The word unbiased or biased should not be introduced into Rule of Law!.......Progressivism has no place what-so-ever in Law!!!!!! Conservatism is another logical issue! But you probably can't understand that because it sounds like the Cultural Communist are you're handlers?

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

How in the hell did Trump steal the election? Obama won his election; even though I truly think he was and is an usurper!!!!! Democrats will pay the price when the truth comes out!!!!

Gatsby

Biased you say? How about the rabidly liberal Ginsberg & Sotomeyer?

Gatsby

Great post! Now who should replace Anthony Kennedy, who is almost certian to announce his retirement before Trumps third year begins?

Some think as soon as this summer.

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

Gatsby: It's a beautiful thing.....I can see after Trump's first term a Supreme Court ruling 7 to 2 on every major issue brought forward!!!! By the end of the 2nd term 9 to 0 or worst case 8 to 1!!!!

acknowledgeurma

Youse guys might want to do some fact check on this.
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/04/scotus-didnt-ban-teaching-islam/
http://www.weeklystandard.com/fact-check-did-neil-gorsuch-issue-a-scotus-opinion-banning-islam-from-americas-schools/article/2008348

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

acknowledgeurma: You would do well to stay away from such hobby sites....they are unregulated, have serious hidden agendas and tend to avoid Truth, and generally run by libs!!!!!

acknowledgeurma

That's why I included the weekly standard; it is considered to have a conservative leaning.

I find it useful to check various "fact check" sites. Most will give an explanation of there assessments that can be further evaluated. Where do you go to check the things you read? How do you avoid confirmation bias?

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

Try the federal register, Open Secrets. Org seems to boil all the bullshit out of issues. Utilize Benkert’s Law: If you wonder why somethng is happening
that doesn’t make sense, say “Money” and you’ll have the answer!

maryjane

The truly sad and not understandable part of the court's ruling is that half the justices seem to see no problems with anything Islam being involved in our schools in any way. That is truly scary for me.

acknowledgeurma

So did you check any of these sources to see if what you reported was valid? I checked the federal register and Open Secrets and they had nothing on "SCOTUS bans teaching islam". Googling "Benkert’s Law" just gave a bunch of lawyer references.

What sort of fact checking did you do on your original post?

acknowledgeurma

The court never made the reported ruling. Please do some checking people!