Check out topic: BIDEN APPROVES $1 BILLION IN WEAPONS FOR ISRAEL AMID RAFAH TENSIONS
Mueller Closing In On Trump
Mar 6, 2018 14:57:17 #
You don’t know the party affiliations of Mueller’s people. Only two, who were fired.
Super Dave wrote:
A Professional wouldn't pick a team exclusively from one political party, nor pick political fan-boys in a politically charged investigation.
Mar 6, 2018 14:58:17 #
The Uranium thing was debunked long ago.
Nuclearian wrote:
He already said it was false. Don't you ever listen to REAL NEWS? You are about as dumb as a box of rocks. Mueller said there was no collusion, which was what he was supposed to investigate. NOW all Trump has to do is fire the prick, and then get started on Hitlery, Obastard, and all those dimbocraps involved with Uranium ONE. And since Mueller was involved with that, he needs to be prosecuted also.
Mar 6, 2018 14:59:53 #
For starters, obstruction of justice. Also money laundering. Also collusion with Russia.
maureenthannon wrote:
Richard, You're sure Trumpwill be impeached, for what charge? I don't think that he didn't thrill and turn on Chris Mathews like Obama did is an impeachable offense.
Mar 6, 2018 15:11:39 #
Richard94611 wrote:
your fantasies are amusing. You cannot deal with Trump’s evil nature, so you have to look back at Hillary and spout a bunch of atrocious nonsense.
Trump's "evil nature" is the REAL fantasy! How many people are dead and buried that had something against the Clintons? Before you say it, I know there's no proof (yet). Too many "coincidences". However, if you're looking for an "evil nature", Hillary fit the bill perfectly. You probably don't believe all those stories about her yelling and swearing at her campaign workers, or throwing things at Bill, or throwing temper tantrums when she didn't get her way. I don't think all these things never happened, and even if only some of them are true, her "evil nature" has been documented. She's a bitch of the first water. You apparently cannot deal with it.
Mar 6, 2018 15:13:37 #
oldroy
Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
Richard94611 wrote:
Trump will be impeached. Wait and see, wishful thinker.
Do you know what it takes in Congress to impeach any elected officials? I say you are too far left leaning to have any idea what is needed. You don't know that the House does the impeaching and then the Senate, with a 2/3 vote, removes. The numbers against Clinton were about what we have now except there are 2 or 3 more Democrats in the Senate. The Republican House won't impeach Trump as easily as they did Clinton and I don't think enough Senators will vote for removal.
Impeachment is a big word among you leaners but none of you seem to have read the Constitution about how impeachment should be done. Maybe you need to begin some talk about changing that part of the Constitution. That would be dangerous since you may take interest in Amendment 2 away.
May I ask if the reason for appointing Mueller was impeachment of Trump? I ask that because there must have been a better reason than that.
Mar 6, 2018 15:15:53 #
peter11937
Loc: NYS
Richard94611 wrote:
Trump will be impeached. Wait and see, wishful thinker.
Delusional, get over it Hillary LOST!
Mar 6, 2018 15:16:11 #
Richard94611 wrote:
From the Democrat Party supporting Politifact:You don’t know the party affiliations of Mueller’s people. Only two, who were fired.
Six of the 15 lawyers who have been publicly identified have not made campaign contributions to any political campaigns at the federal level. But among the lawyers who did make contributions, a total of $62,043 went to Democrats and $2,750 to Republicans, according to the special counsel’s office
,........
They don't mention some of them are die hard Democrat Party activists.
Mar 6, 2018 18:48:29 #
Richard94611 wrote:
The Uranium thing was debunked long ago.
Please direct me to some evidence that the Uranium One situation has been debunked.
Mar 6, 2018 18:57:31 #
Google it.
JW wrote:
Please direct me to some evidence that the Uranium One situation has been debunked.
Mar 6, 2018 19:01:34 #
Mar 6, 2018 20:31:03 #
Fox News anchor debunks 'Clinton uranium scandal' – and sparks viewer fury
Shepard Smith said Donald Trump’s accusations that Hillary Clinton secured a deal involving uranium mining, Russia and her foundation were ‘inaccurate’
Joanna Walters in New York
@Joannawalters13
Wed 15 Nov 2017 13.37 EST Last modified on Fri 9 Feb 2018 13.36 EST
Shares
Fox News’s chief news anchor, Shepard Smith, called the story ‘inaccurate in a number of ways’.
Fox News anchor Shepard Smith on Tuesday evening debunked what his own network has called the Hillary Clinton uranium scandal, sparking fury among some Fox viewers.
Smith said Donald Trump’s repeated accusations during the election campaign that Hillary Clinton smoothed a deal while she was secretary of state involving US uranium mining, Russia and the family’s charitable Clinton Foundation was “inaccurate in a number of ways”.
Shepard Smith breaks with Fox News line on Trump: 'Why all these lies?'
The story was revived this week because the attorney general, Jeff Sessions, is under from the president to appoint a special prosecutor to look into the old allegations. Sessions hinted in a congressional hearing on Tuesday that there was to do so.
But a comprehensive unraveling of the accusations themselves via Fox News, albeit by an anchor who has balked before at the channel’s habit of stoking stories that bolster Trump and weaken Clinton, has shaken many in Fox’s loyal conservative audience.
“Get Shepard Smith off of Fox. He’s arrogant and doing his own spin. Nobody knows how deep the left’s conspiracy goes and Shepherd Smith has ZERO inside info because nobody trusts him. OUT!” one outraged Fox viewer posted on Twitter after the segment aired.
Fox News reports on Uranium One. Shepard Smith uses detailed facts & graphs to explain why there is no reason to investigate. It is a false controversy meant to draw our attention from real issues within the Trump administration.
4:31 PM - Nov 14, 2017
470
344 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
In a lengthy and complex segment, Shepard Smith outlined the original accusations, made in a book by a journalist for rightwing news website Breitbart, and Trump’s using them to boost support on the campaign, and took them apart.
He first described the accusations that when Hillary Clinton led the state department in the Obama administration, she approved the sale of a Canadian company, which had large uranium mining interests in Wyoming, to the Russian nuclear agency and in a quid pro quo received $140m in donations to the Clinton Foundation from nine people involved in the business deal.
The accusations, along with the problem of Clinton using a private email server while she was secretary of state, which was prohibited, had prompted frequent of “Lock her up” from Republican crowds on the campaign trail, which Trump did not discourage.
On Tuesday night, Smith played a clip of Trump repeating the allegations against Clinton.
“That statement is inaccurate in a number of ways,” Smith said. He then went on to describe how the deal needed the approval of a committee formed from the heads of nine federal government agencies, and Barack Obama – because of the national security implications of Russia holding any US uranium interests – under rules written during the Ronald Reagan administration. He pointed out that the state department said Clinton did not intervene to approve the deal and, besides, did not have the power to approve or block the deal.
He added that none of the uranium mined in Wyoming by the Canadian company was exported to Russia, and the vast bulk of the donations to the Clinton Foundation were made by a man who had already sold his stake in the uranium company in 2007 – years before the Russian deal went through and about 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.
As if perhaps realizing he was broadcasting a segment that went against the grain of other stories about the uranium deal reported by Fox, and against the political bent of many viewers, Smith stumbled over his script several times during the report.
After detailing the scheduling of the donations, he said: “Here the timing is accurate … inaccurate.”
Fox News of the revived scandal on Monday and the prospects of Sessions summoning general counsel to investigate. Sessions has asked DoJ lawyers to review the facts before he makes any announcement.
Shepard Smith said Donald Trump’s accusations that Hillary Clinton secured a deal involving uranium mining, Russia and her foundation were ‘inaccurate’
Joanna Walters in New York
@Joannawalters13
Wed 15 Nov 2017 13.37 EST Last modified on Fri 9 Feb 2018 13.36 EST
Shares
Fox News’s chief news anchor, Shepard Smith, called the story ‘inaccurate in a number of ways’.
Fox News anchor Shepard Smith on Tuesday evening debunked what his own network has called the Hillary Clinton uranium scandal, sparking fury among some Fox viewers.
Smith said Donald Trump’s repeated accusations during the election campaign that Hillary Clinton smoothed a deal while she was secretary of state involving US uranium mining, Russia and the family’s charitable Clinton Foundation was “inaccurate in a number of ways”.
Shepard Smith breaks with Fox News line on Trump: 'Why all these lies?'
The story was revived this week because the attorney general, Jeff Sessions, is under from the president to appoint a special prosecutor to look into the old allegations. Sessions hinted in a congressional hearing on Tuesday that there was to do so.
But a comprehensive unraveling of the accusations themselves via Fox News, albeit by an anchor who has balked before at the channel’s habit of stoking stories that bolster Trump and weaken Clinton, has shaken many in Fox’s loyal conservative audience.
“Get Shepard Smith off of Fox. He’s arrogant and doing his own spin. Nobody knows how deep the left’s conspiracy goes and Shepherd Smith has ZERO inside info because nobody trusts him. OUT!” one outraged Fox viewer posted on Twitter after the segment aired.
Fox News reports on Uranium One. Shepard Smith uses detailed facts & graphs to explain why there is no reason to investigate. It is a false controversy meant to draw our attention from real issues within the Trump administration.
4:31 PM - Nov 14, 2017
470
344 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
In a lengthy and complex segment, Shepard Smith outlined the original accusations, made in a book by a journalist for rightwing news website Breitbart, and Trump’s using them to boost support on the campaign, and took them apart.
He first described the accusations that when Hillary Clinton led the state department in the Obama administration, she approved the sale of a Canadian company, which had large uranium mining interests in Wyoming, to the Russian nuclear agency and in a quid pro quo received $140m in donations to the Clinton Foundation from nine people involved in the business deal.
The accusations, along with the problem of Clinton using a private email server while she was secretary of state, which was prohibited, had prompted frequent of “Lock her up” from Republican crowds on the campaign trail, which Trump did not discourage.
On Tuesday night, Smith played a clip of Trump repeating the allegations against Clinton.
“That statement is inaccurate in a number of ways,” Smith said. He then went on to describe how the deal needed the approval of a committee formed from the heads of nine federal government agencies, and Barack Obama – because of the national security implications of Russia holding any US uranium interests – under rules written during the Ronald Reagan administration. He pointed out that the state department said Clinton did not intervene to approve the deal and, besides, did not have the power to approve or block the deal.
He added that none of the uranium mined in Wyoming by the Canadian company was exported to Russia, and the vast bulk of the donations to the Clinton Foundation were made by a man who had already sold his stake in the uranium company in 2007 – years before the Russian deal went through and about 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.
As if perhaps realizing he was broadcasting a segment that went against the grain of other stories about the uranium deal reported by Fox, and against the political bent of many viewers, Smith stumbled over his script several times during the report.
After detailing the scheduling of the donations, he said: “Here the timing is accurate … inaccurate.”
Fox News of the revived scandal on Monday and the prospects of Sessions summoning general counsel to investigate. Sessions has asked DoJ lawyers to review the facts before he makes any announcement.
Super Dave wrote:
IOW, it wasn't debunked.
Got it.
Got it.
Check out topic: Will Biden Debate Trump?
Mar 6, 2018 20:35:06 #
"HE'S ALREADY SAID THERE WAS NO COLLUSION ? AND YOU BELIEVE A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR WITH 2,000 DOCUMENTED LIES PRINTED UP BY THE NEW YORK TMES?
Nuclearian wrote:
Yes. This is a witch hunt to find BS! He already said there was no collusion. The investigation is technically over. Now is time for investigating the Nazi, Klintoon!!
Mar 6, 2018 20:50:14 #
peter11937
Loc: NYS
Richard94611 wrote:
"HE'S ALREADY SAID THERE WAS NO COLLUSION ? AND YOU BELIEVE A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR WITH 2,000 DOCUMENTED LIES PRINTED UP BY THE NEW YORK TMES?
Shep Smith, wrong as usual.
Mar 6, 2018 22:37:22 #
Richard94611 wrote:
The speeding tickets can come later. Mueller is after bigger targets -- collusion with Russia. And he will prove this and nail Trump real well. Then we will see if a President can pardon himself (I doubt it).
Why do you wish this president such ill will? Why are you so thirsty for blood with this man? Are you really so hateful of this man that your willing to put the country through a constitutional crisis? Are you that unable to accept Hillary lost and unable to wait for the next election to just vote him out of office,,instead of turning the country upside down? Whatever happened to country over party? You liberals are just embarrassing yourselves at this point.
Mar 6, 2018 23:24:05 #
Richard94611 wrote:
Trump will be impeached. Wait and see, wishful thinker.
OK, we will wait, but not holding our breath.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.