One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Just a few facts the MSM can't seem to cover.
Feb 20, 2018 07:57:03   #
cold iron Loc: White House
 
Just a few facts the MSM can't seem to cover.

https://www.uspoliticalculture.com/2018/02/19/look-obama-caught-immediately-trump-cleared-collusion/

Reply
Feb 20, 2018 08:41:29   #
Lonewolf
 
Trump was cleared on nothing yet Muller will get to him soon enough



quote=cold iron]Just a few facts the MSM can't seem to cover.

https://www.uspoliticalculture.com/2018/02/19/look-obama-caught-immediately-trump-cleared-collusion/[/quote]

Reply
Feb 20, 2018 08:50:51   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 





BREAKING: Obama’s Damning Secret Finally Goes Public – Congress Considering Federal Charges

February 19, 2018 baze kosulcev News, Politics 0

A new book is reportedly about to come out that will expose the “vast corruption,” by some of Washington’s most powerful players, including Barack Obama.

Breitbart reported that HarperCollins just released the book cover of “Clinton Cash” author Peter Schweizer’s new book, Secret Empires: How Our Politicians Hide Corruption and Enrich Their Families and Friends. Though not much is known about what is in the book, five images on the book’s cover suggest that Schweizer’s next targets may include Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), former Vice President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State John Kerry, and President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.

The publisher said that the book will expose vast corruption by top Washington figures who leverage their political power to enrich their family members and friends, often by helping grease deals with foreign entities.

“My publisher has me under a strict embargo not to reveal any contents from the book,” Schweizer said.

Schweizer’s 2015 book “Clinton Cash” revealed that Hillary Clinton’s State Department, along with eight other agencies, approved the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium and that nine foreign investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation. In a surprising twist, some of Schweizer’s biggest defenders were liberals, with progressive columnist Eleanor Clift hailing Schweizer as“an equal-opportunity investigator, snaring Republicans as well as Democrats.” And Columbia University Earth Institute Director Jeffrey D. Sachs said Clinton Cash was “compelling reading on how Bill and Hillary have mixed personal wealthy, power, and influence peddling.”

Speculation is mounting that Schweizer’s new book will expose Obama’s deep state that is hellbent on taking Trump down. Unlike most other presidents, Obama decided to stay in Washington after leaving office, moving to a home near the White House so that he could keep an eye on Trump.

Reply
Feb 20, 2018 09:04:15   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
I have doubts, I think the "Russian" portion is over. However, I think that Mueller will attempt to expand his writ of authority and try to charge our President with "interference" or "obstruction of justice". I think that will also fall flat. The problem is proof.... if President Trump exercised his power — even his lawful power — with a corrupt motive of interfering with an investigation, that’s obstruction. But, proving that his motivation was corrupt, would be difficult or impossible. We are talking about pretending to know what a person was thinking. In light of this, even under oath, Comey said that he was not told to stop investigating. As far as I know, no one can say that the President told anyone to stop investigating. If you have a link to someone who could shut down the investigation...do provide a link.

Lonewolf wrote:
Trump was cleared on nothing yet Muller will get to him soon enough


quote=cold iron]Just a few facts the MSM can't seem to cover.

https://www.uspoliticalculture.com/2018/02/19/look-obama-caught-immediately-trump-cleared-collusion/
[/quote]

Reply
Feb 20, 2018 09:15:13   #
cold iron Loc: White House
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Trump was cleared on nothing yet Muller will get to him soon enough



quote=cold iron]Just a few facts the MSM can't seem to cover.

https://www.uspoliticalculture.com/2018/02/19/look-obama-caught-immediately-trump-cleared-collusion/
[/quote]


Seems you missed the report "No American was involved in any collusion." I guess that means you are still being check on.

Reply
Feb 20, 2018 09:25:09   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
cold iron wrote:
Seems you missed the report "No American was involved in any collusion." I guess that means you are still being check on.


It would seem that it is a hospital for the criminally insane is still checking on him to see if they think he should be returned there. A recall seems like a great idea.

Reply
Feb 20, 2018 09:48:57   #
Kevyn
 
Pennylynn wrote:
I have doubts, I think the "Russian" portion is over. However, I think that Mueller will attempt to expand his writ of authority and try to charge our President with "interference" or "obstruction of justice". I think that will also fall flat. The problem is proof.... if President Trumpb exercised his power — even his lawful power — with a corrupt motive of interfering with an investigation, that’s obstruction. But, proving that his motivation was corrupt, would be difficult or impossible. We are talking about pretending to know what a person was thinking. In light of this, even under oath, Comey said that he was not told to stop investigating. As far as I know, no one can say that the President told anyone to stop investigating. If you have a link to someone who could shut down the investigation...do provide a link.
I have doubts, I think the "Russian" por... (show quote)
The charges in my opinion will not be for obstruction but for criminal business practices related to money laundering for Russians in exchange for high risk loans to prevent Trumps financial collapse. Time will tell.

Reply
Feb 20, 2018 15:41:05   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Perhaps. But, if the goal is to remove the President from office or to impeach him which although would stain his record, then money laundering will not accomplish that goal. If you look carefully at events, it is unmistakable the desired outcome.... that of removing the sitting President.

If it were about Russians meddling or any country meddling in our elections, then actions would have taken place long before 2016. We first became aware that Russia could and did meddle in elections back in 1968 and have been investigated from that election onward to 2016. Back in 68, Russia funded antiwar demonstrators. And collusion... I think when historians get around to it, they may also conclude that Richard Nixon's meeting with Anna Chan Chennault who represented South Vietnamese President Nguyen Van Thieu qualifies. NSA intercepted the cables where Nixon promised he would secure a better deal for his country than either Humphrey or Johnson, and that the Democrats were effectively prepared to sell out Saigon in order to secure peace at any price. If Chennault could convince Thieu to stay away from the negotiating table, the talks would collapse, LBJ would look foolish and the Democrats’ 11th-hour gambit would fail. But, no investigation was brought forward indeed the plan to impeach him was devised by the Democrats to impeach him on Watergate. NSA lacked a definitive “smoking gun” that tied Nixon to the arrangement, and they were loath to compromise American intelligence services by acknowledging the taps and intercepts. Times have changed.... now the creditability of our intelligence community has almost vanished and wiretaps are common place.

Going forward in time, Iran and Regan. The release of the hostages held was no coincidence. Reagan's campaign manager, William Casey, who later became CIA director, colluded with persons close to the ayatollah to delay the release of the hostages. So, as you can see from these two examples, foreign interference in U.S. elections is not, strictly speaking, an entirely unprecedented event.

The only charge, still left for Mueller to accomplish the goal of impeaching and removing our sitting president is obstruction of justice. It is a very long shot, but will serve the goal of the Democrats who do not think highly of our president...and the senators/congressmen can say that they "tried their best" and the voting public may applaud them and award them with their votes.



It would not meet constitutional requirements.
Kevyn wrote:
The charges in my opinion will not be for obstruction but for criminal business practices related to money laundering for Russians in exchange for high risk loans to prevent Trumps financial collapse. Time will tell.

Reply
Feb 21, 2018 07:10:51   #
Big Kahuna
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Trump was cleared on nothing yet Muller will get to him soon enough



quote=cold iron]Just a few facts the MSM can't seem to cover.

https://www.uspoliticalculture.com/2018/02/19/look-obama-caught-immediately-trump-cleared-collusion/
[/quote]
The only thing the MSM better cover is their lying and fake news behinds as the ratings show their favorable ratings are at an all time low. A most corrupt group of leftist people is hard to find!!

Reply
Feb 21, 2018 13:37:56   #
Mikeyavelli
 
All the bureaus are involved.
Trump should address them, one and all, from the Chiefs to the janitor, Ya fiyad!

Reply
Feb 21, 2018 17:28:58   #
cold iron Loc: White House
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Perhaps. But, if the goal is to remove the President from office or to impeach him which although would stain his record, then money laundering will not accomplish that goal. If you look carefully at events, it is unmistakable the desired outcome.... that of removing the sitting President.

If it were about Russians meddling or any country meddling in our elections, then actions would have taken place long before 2016. We first became aware that Russia could and did meddle in elections back in 1968 and have been investigated from that election onward to 2016. Back in 68, Russia funded antiwar demonstrators. And collusion... I think when historians get around to it, they may also conclude that Richard Nixon's meeting with Anna Chan Chennault who represented South Vietnamese President Nguyen Van Thieu qualifies. NSA intercepted the cables where Nixon promised he would secure a better deal for his country than either Humphrey or Johnson, and that the Democrats were effectively prepared to sell out Saigon in order to secure peace at any price. If Chennault could convince Thieu to stay away from the negotiating table, the talks would collapse, LBJ would look foolish and the Democrats’ 11th-hour gambit would fail. But, no investigation was brought forward indeed the plan to impeach him was devised by the Democrats to impeach him on Watergate. NSA lacked a definitive “smoking gun” that tied Nixon to the arrangement, and they were loath to compromise American intelligence services by acknowledging the taps and intercepts. Times have changed.... now the creditability of our intelligence community has almost vanished and wiretaps are common place.

Going forward in time, Iran and Regan. The release of the hostages held was no coincidence. Reagan's campaign manager, William Casey, who later became CIA director, colluded with persons close to the ayatollah to delay the release of the hostages. So, as you can see from these two examples, foreign interference in U.S. elections is not, strictly speaking, an entirely unprecedented event.

The only charge, still left for Mueller to accomplish the goal of impeaching and removing our sitting president is obstruction of justice. It is a very long shot, but will serve the goal of the Democrats who do not think highly of our president...and the senators/congressmen can say that they "tried their best" and the voting public may applaud them and award them with their votes.



It would not meet constitutional requirements.
Perhaps. But, if the goal is to remove the Presid... (show quote)




All the Russians meddling was done by the Democrats, It's all the the report. The left just close there eyes to the facts.

Reply
Feb 21, 2018 17:56:26   #
Mikeyavelli
 
cold iron wrote:
All the Russians meddling was done by the Democrats, It's all the the report. The left just close there eyes to the facts.


Trump walked into hillary's Whitehouse and all of Washington DC is trying to remove him from office. With few exceptions, they are all anti Trump seditionists.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.