Check out topic: Robert Costello wants to testify on Trump's behalf..
Facts is facts
Feb 20, 2018 04:36:48 #
king hall
Loc: Tucson,AZ.
whitenbrat, I wasn't going to bother noting a response until I saw your last plea for help, no rebuttal on any of the FACTUAL items, here is a pair, enjoy:
item 1, did you not hear the DOJ announce its action of 13 indictments? followed by; the 2016 election was not affected? item 8, under the current federal law the mishandling of classified information is a crime...be the material lost or not. (in all fairness to the law the woman is guilty as is all who assisted) And for your bonus point; never has there been a U.S. President who's had 'first' access to nuclear authority. Our President is 3rd in line and after that, there are 2 more safety valves b/4 ignition.
item 1, did you not hear the DOJ announce its action of 13 indictments? followed by; the 2016 election was not affected? item 8, under the current federal law the mishandling of classified information is a crime...be the material lost or not. (in all fairness to the law the woman is guilty as is all who assisted) And for your bonus point; never has there been a U.S. President who's had 'first' access to nuclear authority. Our President is 3rd in line and after that, there are 2 more safety valves b/4 ignition.
Feb 20, 2018 05:05:23 #
whitnebrat
Loc: In the wilds of Oregon
acknowledgeurma wrote:
As I recall, the Dossier was originally started by Republican opponents of Trump, not the Trump Campaign.
You may be right.
Feb 20, 2018 09:37:08 #
whitnebrat wrote:
Ummmm ... if I recall correctly, the Dossier was originally started as an oppo research project by the Trump Campaign. For some reason, they discontinued and the Clinton campaign picked it up and finished it. In either case, it has been verified in many instances as to its accuracy, most recently in the indictments that were made public last Friday. Why can't you all accept factual evidence from multiple sources?
"Why can't you all accept factual evidence from multiple sources?" Because most sources believe it is their job to rid America of President Trump, and they will use fake news to get it done.
Feb 20, 2018 20:05:25 #
My daughter signed me up on Facebook. Lasted a week and I MADE her get me off. Mike
oldroy wrote:
I don't use either of those things but my son did try to get me on that thing. I never could figure out how to do it so only get to see some things on my inbox but do read some good things from a student from way back when.
Feb 20, 2018 20:07:53 #
The only thing they won't label him is SUCCESSFUL! Which he is. He's kicked their asses again and again. Mike
vettelover wrote:
How about our laws that preserve our sovereignty. ... (show quote)
Feb 20, 2018 21:30:47 #
acknowledgeurma wrote:
As I recall, the Dossier was originally started by Republican opponents of Trump, not the Trump Campaign.
You are correct. It started with the GOP when the primaries started. The GOP ended th e dirt search and the Clinton campaign and the DNC picked it up from there.
Feb 20, 2018 23:30:17 #
vettelover wrote:
You are correct. It started with the GOP when the primaries started. The GOP ended th e dirt search and the Clinton campaign and the DNC picked it up from there.
So is "opposition research" collusion to affect the election when the information comes from foreign players? Like Christopher Steele? Or his "Russian sources"? Hmmmm
Check out topic: MAGA folks live the dream
Feb 21, 2018 00:46:26 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
debeda wrote:
So is "opposition research" collusion to affect the election when the information comes from foreign players? Like Christopher Steele? Or his "Russian sources"? Hmmmm
I’d like to know if Steele, DNC, or Hillary registered as a foreign agent.
Feb 21, 2018 00:49:19 #
JFlorio wrote:
I’d like to know if Steele, DNC, or Hillary registered as a foreign agent.
LMAO the DNC should for sure. The Domestic Nihilation Committee
Feb 21, 2018 03:09:32 #
acknowledgeurma wrote:
As I recall, the Dossier was originally started by Republican opponents of Trump, not the Trump Campaign.
You both recall wrong a common thing in the liberal community.
Feb 21, 2018 10:23:30 #
vettelover wrote:
You are correct. It started with the GOP when the primaries started. The GOP ended th e dirt search and the Clinton campaign and the DNC picked it up from there.
C'mon people, the press, the Democrats, AND the Republicans wanted to derail Trump. It turns out he kicked all their butts. That alone is a plus for our President. And those Sunday and late night shows are still at it. Viva Trump MAGA!!!
Feb 21, 2018 19:42:07 #
debeda wrote:
So is "opposition research" collusion to affect the election when the information comes from foreign players? Like Christopher Steele? Or his "Russian sources"? Hmmmm
The whole thing is one giant fcking lie. Obama and the democrats created all this so they cam spy on the Trump campaign and to use as some type of BS to sway public opinion against him. There is no doubt about it.
Feb 21, 2018 19:43:23 #
Kazudy wrote:
C'mon people, the press, the Democrats, AND the Republicans wanted to derail Trump. It turns out he kicked all their butts. That alone is a plus for our President. And those Sunday and late night shows are still at it. Viva Trump MAGA!!!
Agree. That was not the original question though
Feb 21, 2018 21:24:11 #
vettelover wrote:
The whole thing is one giant fcking lie. Obama and the democrats created all this so they cam spy on the Trump campaign and to use as some type of BS to sway public opinion against him. There is no doubt about it.
AGREED
Feb 22, 2018 09:59:56 #
vettelover wrote:
Agree. That was not the original question though
I know, but I had to get that in there, so I took that opportunity.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: Why the Palestinian Authority Should Not Return to Gaza