ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Consider the following:
"in 1991, former US Navy Intelligence Briefing Team member Milton William Cooper wrote a book titled "Behold A Pale Horse" within which he reveals a wealth of great information long hidden from the public eye, some dating all the way back to the 1940's.

.....on page 225 of his book, Cooper dropped the following bombshell paragraph that should be looked at much more deeply in light of what recently happened in Florida.:

The government encouraged the manufacture and importation of military firearms for the criminals to use. This is intended to foster a feeling of insecurity, which would lead the American people to voluntarily disarm themselves by passing laws against firearms. Using drugs and hypnosis on mental patients in a process called Orion, the CIA inculcated the desire in these people to open fire on schoolyards and thus inflame the antigun lobby. This plan is well under way, and so far is working perfectly. The middle class is begging the government to do away with the 2nd amendment."

okie don

AS i RECALL, THEY DETESTED HIS ' SPILLING THE BEANS' AND MURDERED HIM IN HIS FRONT DRIVEWAY!

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

It’s a false flag and if what I read it’s going to get a lot worse,some of the things will make a school shooting look mild,sure hope it’s all BS but anything today with the left wouldn’t suprise me.

buffalo Loc: Texas

Come on, Hemiman, it is not a left or right issue. It is a corporate/government collusion designed and financed using taxpayer dollars. Part of that collusion is keeping the sheople ignorant and divided with a false left/right dichotomy. The reason why can be found in the Hegelian Dialectic. Formulated by German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, the Hegelian Dialectic says the human mind can’t understand anything unless it can be split into two polar opposites, i.e. Left / Right.

And establishment insider Carroll Quigley revealed why there doesn’t appear to be much difference between Republican and Democrat presidents, such as Obama and George W. Bush.

http://youtu.be/bF6Dt7SS_yw

“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers,” Quigley advocated in his book Tragedy and Hope. “Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy.”

In other words, Republicans and Democrats will publicly debate minor issues, but when it comes to major corporate and/or international issues of the transnational interests who control both parties, many of the Republicans and Democrats will toe the line and serve their master’s agenda. The rest is just to keep the sheople distracted and divided.

http://youtu.be/IjUX9QGIeeg

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Did not know that!!

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Spot on!!

Justsss Loc: Wisconsin

[quote=buffalo]Come on, Hemiman, it is not a left or right issue. It is a corporate/government collusion designed and financed using taxpayer dollars. Part of that collusion is keeping the sheople ignorant and divided with a false left/right dichotomy. The reason why can be found in the Hegelian Dialectic. Formulated by German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, the Hegelian Dialectic.

buffalo, thanks for bringing this up. I’ll bet 95% or more on here have never even heard of the Hegelian Dialectic.

Justsss Loc: Wisconsin

[quote=ACP45]Consider the following:
"in 1991, former US Navy Intelligence Briefing Team member Milton William Cooper wrote a book

ACP45, Bill paid the ultimate sacrifice for telling us the truth.

buffalo Loc: Texas

[quote=Justsss]

People here on OPP do not seem to understand that it has, for quite some time, not really mattered which party was voted into power in America. Not really. As corporations, the deep state and their media apparatchiks have gained greater and greater control of both sides of the political and legal processes in the US, as they have stacked both sides of every election with their chosen candidates, as they have owned ever greater numbers of politicians at every other level in the political system, so the differences between the "2" parties have become merely the left and right arms of the "1" corporate party. Voting is like one choosing between vanilla or chocolate ice-cream. You choose the flavor you prefer, but what you are really eating is essentially the same thing. In the same way it has, for quite some time now, not really mattered which arm of the "corporate party" was voted into power.

The 2 arms of the corporate party act in concert to create divisiveness with false left/right spectrum among the easily duped sheople while keeping control of the political and economic agenda.

I know many will reject this contention outright. Truly mind-boggling amounts of money and effort have been expended in polarizing the American sheople into these political camps. And so, many of you have allowed yourself to be labelled by this imposed political affiliation and then you have allowed yourself to believe that the ills of your nation are because of the opposing faction.

My recognition of this false left/right paradigm and trying to see the real motives that lie behind is what makes it difficult to accurately place me in either the left arm or right arm of the corporate party because I am neither. I strive to think outside of the constrictive box of left and right that politicians and their apparatchik media have lulled the sheople into. In other words, not supporting a candidate, a policy, or taking position, just because they are considered to be “left-wing” or “right-wing” but rather on the basis of the actual merit OR destructiveness, ie, continual illegal, unConstitutional, immoral warmongering to promote the spending of TRILLIONS of taxpayer dollars/debt for defense of democracy or national security when, in actuality, those wars are being conducted for the benefit and enrichment of the military industrial complex corporations and/or to protect the profits of giant conglomerate corporations and/or to ensure the hegemony of the petrodollar.

Then the lie that the time has come to cut Social Security, Medicare, and welfare to reduce the expected $1 trillion deficit, created by those very tax cuts. When in reality the massive deficits will be created by the tax cuts to the wealthiest 1% and big corporations. Politicians are never fiscally conservative when it relates to military spending, but when it comes time to talk about spending on the millions of poor, elderly and disadvantaged they become tighter "than bark on a tree"...fiscally conservative.

I gotta go for now...

buffalo Loc: Texas

To continue:

Speaking of cutting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and other social safety net programs, why is there no talk of reducing the coming massive budget deficits by eliminating the 100s of BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars spent on corporate welfare which dwarfs social welfare spending? While politicians and their apparatchik media love to portray AND stigmatize social welfare as parasitic while promoting corporate welfare as an integral part of economic progress.

Jon Kofas writes on his blogspot in 2014:

"How humane, how compassionate, how democratic, and how civilized is a society that opts to shift resources to the wealthy from lower income groups, impoverished mothers and children, the elderly, the disabled and the mentally ill unable to care for themselves, while permitting the wretched of the earth to die of starvation, lack of medical care, housing, and the basic necessities of life, while at the same time celebrating the “success” of the rich becoming even richer because of corporate welfare?

Most people are dismayed and shocked when they hear on TV or read about some welfare recipient cheating the system of a few thousand dollars or euro. By contrast, they easily brush aside news that hundreds of billions are given to bail out large banks and subsidies to corporations, or tax breaks as part of a corporate welfare system designed to support a capitalist economy insisting that it is still a “free enterprise” system, presumably standing on its own without government handouts. This means that in the minds of most people there is a lack of legitimacy for social welfare, indeed a stigma. By contrast, there is a sense of rightful ownership and legitimacy to public funds distributed to banks and corporations. When it comes time to reduce budgetary deficits, (regardless of their cause) therefore, the target is not corporate welfare but social welfare.

Conclusions (text in () are mine:
1. Should a modern society under the existing state-supported market political economy have a credible social safety net to avoid cases of extreme poverty and people dying in the street benches where the homeless sleep, or should it simply focus on strengthening the corporate welfare system using taxpayer money with the hope that this will take care of all problems in society? (TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS?)
2. Is greater economic growth and development achieved under the corporate welfare state vs. a weakened social welfare system, or does the trend of massive capital concentration with the state’s help lead to economic contractions that create deep structural economic problems?
3. What engenders greater social and political harmony in society? A very strong corporate welfare system coexisting with a weak social welfare system, or a mix where the social safety net balances the massive capital concentration?
4. Has the advocacy of corporate welfare and opposition to social welfare entailed that centrist and center left political parties and groups embraced the right wing (Social Darwinist) agenda, elements of which include racism, ethnocentrism and xenophobia?"

Full blog:

http://jonkofas.blogspot.com/2014/04/corporate-welfare-vs-social-welfare.html

What is causing the massive deficits? You judge

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

I wish more OPP'ers would take a moment and really think about this paragraph in your post:

"Then the lie that the time has come to cut Social Security, Medicare, and welfare to reduce the expected $1 trillion deficit, created by those very tax cuts. When in reality the massive deficits will be created by the tax cuts to the wealthiest 1% and big corporations. Politicians are never fiscally conservative when it relates to military spending, but when it comes time to talk about spending on the millions of poor, elderly and disadvantaged they become tighter "than bark on a tree"...fiscally conservative."

Spot on!

Crayons Loc: St Jo, Texas

I posted this article Saturday and someone said it was conspiracy...well; it is a conspiracy to incrementally destroy the republic.

Here's two more links the squishy kool aid drinkers wont like...
https://americandigitalnews.com/2018/02/16/red-pill-chronicles-massacre-left-promised-florida-school-shooting/

https://americandigitalnews.com/2018/02/17/massacre-left-promised-p2-kid-nobody-wanted-stop/

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Very interesting articles.

buffalo Loc: Texas

Yes, it is really disgusting that many posters here on OPP do not understand how the taxpayers are LIED to for justification of the obscene amount of tax dollars wasted on military spending.

As Stephen Miles, director of the Washington DC-based Win Without War advocacy group, said the new military spending numbers were a symptom of misplaced national priorities.

“When our nation can’t manage to turn the lights on for the people of Puerto Rico, when we can’t help those suffering from opioid addiction get treatment, and when we can’t ensure education and healthcare to all of our citizens, how is it possible we can justify spending billions more on weapons that don’t work to fight enemies that don’t exist?”

Estimated total military budget for the period Oct.1, 2018 through Sept. 30, 2019 is $886 BILLION! Just the $80 increase for 2018 is bigger than the TOTAL budget of any other country except China.

https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-military-budget-components-challenges-growth-3306320

The US “spends more on national defense than China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, the United Kingdom, India, France and Japan combined”, the report said, and yet “US infant mortality rates in 2013 were the highest in the developed world”.

Don't argue that Social Security and Medicare spending is greater because those programs bring in tax dollars and should be self - funding if the goddamn greedy, corporate owned politicians would keep their hands out of those programs. What tax money does the DOD or Pentagon bring in?

Crayons Loc: St Jo, Texas

It's what they hide, posted a thread here stating they have lost 22 Trillion with a T
enough to pay the debt. Not to mention they've lost track of 44k men; They dont know
where they are? I'd guess a few of em are out in space riding zippin around in TR3B's