She is still walking around with $145 Million Dollars. We the people know the answers! (Page 2): Which Russian changed the minds of soooo manyyyy people to not vote hills?? :sm16:...

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Super Dave wrote:

Which Russian stopped Hillary from campaigning in Wisconsin?

Which Russian changed the minds of soooo manyyyy people to not vote hills??

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

Peewee wrote:

Nope, Shep isn't that stupid. CNN is laying off people now and bleeding green and will soon close up shop. Should be a good deal for a conservative outlet to pick up, for pennies on the dollar.

They wouldn’t even have to change the name,it could be Christian News Network

debeda

Super Dave wrote:

Which Russian stopped Hillary from campaigning in Wisconsin?

Lolololol GREAT point. She thought she had it in the bag. HAHAHAHA silly twit...

mongo Loc: TEXAS

PeterS wrote:

Because this has nothing to do with Trump climbing up Putins ass...

Seems like you're going to keep running with the Trump/Russia
collusion story, even though it's been proven a lie, until the bells on
your pink slippers fall off!

Babsan

Weasel wrote:

Very Good! I have known this for years.
My question still. Knowing this, Why are we paying Mueller for what appears to be nothing?

The DEMOCRATS requested this and should be held responsible to pay this errand boy of theirs.NO taxpayer money to Criminals

moldyoldy

Babsan wrote:

The DEMOCRATS requested this and should be held responsible to pay this errand boy of theirs.NO taxpayer money to Criminals

GOP’s fear and loathing of Hillary Clinton cost you $100 million

http://www.newstalkflorida.com/featured/gops-fear-loathing-hillary-clinton-cost-100-million/

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

moldyoldy wrote:

GOP’s fear and loathing of Hillary Clinton cost you $100 million

http://www.newstalkflorida.com/featured/gops-fear-loathing-hillary-clinton-cost-100-million/

We should get it from Hillary's Uranium bribe

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Weasel wrote:

Very Good! I have known this for years.
My question still. Knowing this, Why are we paying Mueller for what appears to be nothing?

As both a prosecutor and defense attorney, I have written and reviewed many indictments. Though often brimming with legalese, they are designed by prosecutors to tell a compelling and detailed crime story. The indictment announced Friday in the Mueller investigation told just such a story -- of Russian attempts to sabotage the American presidential election.

If the allegations of the indictment prove true, it seems probable that the Russians were successful in their multimillion-dollar effort to influence the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States. Of course the answer to this complex question will never be definitively known. Polling cannot tell us whether voters might have chosen differently if the Russian influence operation hadn't happened.
What is known, however, is that the election was close and voter shifts in just a few significant states could have changed the Electoral College vote count in a presidential election in which Hillary Clinton won the popular vote.
The President, of course, has consistently been assuring the American public that the investigation led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller is all about a "hoax" and that it's a "witch hunt" largely supported by the forces of "Crooked Hillary Clinton" and the "fake news," which can roughly be defined as any news organization that offers any coverage that reflects badly on Donald Trump.
Trump and the GOP are making the Republican brand toxic for a generation
Trump and the GOP are making the Republican brand toxic for a generation
Mueller quietly and effectively disposed of those claims in his detailed explanation of how the Russian government literally sought to hack and hijack America's most important election by creating truly fake social media posts and protests designed to support the candidacy of Donald Trump (and in the primaries, Bernie Sanders) while sabotaging the candidacy of Hillary Clinton. The indictments revealed Russia's use of an assortment of dirty tricks in heavily funded efforts to deceive the American public.

debeda

permafrost wrote:

As both a prosecutor and defense attorney, I have written and reviewed many indictments. Though often brimming with legalese, they are designed by prosecutors to tell a compelling and detailed crime story. The indictment announced Friday in the Mueller investigation told just such a story -- of Russian attempts to sabotage the American presidential election.

If the allegations of the indictment prove true, it seems probable that the Russians were successful in their multimillion-dollar effort to influence the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States. Of course the answer to this complex question will never be definitively known. Polling cannot tell us whether voters might have chosen differently if the Russian influence operation hadn't happened.
What is known, however, is that the election was close and voter shifts in just a few significant states could have changed the Electoral College vote count in a presidential election in which Hillary Clinton won the popular vote.
The President, of course, has consistently been assuring the American public that the investigation led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller is all about a "hoax" and that it's a "witch hunt" largely supported by the forces of "Crooked Hillary Clinton" and the "fake news," which can roughly be defined as any news organization that offers any coverage that reflects badly on Donald Trump.
Trump and the GOP are making the Republican brand toxic for a generation
Trump and the GOP are making the Republican brand toxic for a generation
Mueller quietly and effectively disposed of those claims in his detailed explanation of how the Russian government literally sought to hack and hijack America's most important election by creating truly fake social media posts and protests designed to support the candidacy of Donald Trump (and in the primaries, Bernie Sanders) while sabotaging the candidacy of Hillary Clinton. The indictments revealed Russia's use of an assortment of dirty tricks in heavily funded efforts to deceive the American public.

As both a prosecutor and defense attorney, I have ... (show quote)

I respectfully disagree with your assessment and vigorously disagree with your conclusions.

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

moldyoldy wrote:

GOP’s fear and loathing of Hillary Clinton cost you $100 million

http://www.newstalkflorida.com/featured/gops-fear-loathing-hillary-clinton-cost-100-million/

Not fear, it’s just like a kid waiting for Christmas morning waiting for her perp walk into Federal Prison.
The cost should be billed to the DNC she is their monster.

sisboombaa

permafrost wrote:

As both a prosecutor and defense attorney, I have written and reviewed many indictments. Though often brimming with legalese, they are designed by prosecutors to tell a compelling and detailed crime story. The indictment announced Friday in the Mueller investigation told just such a story -- of Russian attempts to sabotage the American presidential election.

If the allegations of the indictment prove true, it seems probable that the Russians were successful in their multimillion-dollar effort to influence the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States. Of course the answer to this complex question will never be definitively known. Polling cannot tell us whether voters might have chosen differently if the Russian influence operation hadn't happened.
What is known, however, is that the election was close and voter shifts in just a few significant states could have changed the Electoral College vote count in a presidential election in which Hillary Clinton won the popular vote.
The President, of course, has consistently been assuring the American public that the investigation led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller is all about a "hoax" and that it's a "witch hunt" largely supported by the forces of "Crooked Hillary Clinton" and the "fake news," which can roughly be defined as any news organization that offers any coverage that reflects badly on Donald Trump.
Trump and the GOP are making the Republican brand toxic for a generation
Trump and the GOP are making the Republican brand toxic for a generation
Mueller quietly and effectively disposed of those claims in his detailed explanation of how the Russian government literally sought to hack and hijack America's most important election by creating truly fake social media posts and protests designed to support the candidacy of Donald Trump (and in the primaries, Bernie Sanders) while sabotaging the candidacy of Hillary Clinton. The indictments revealed Russia's use of an assortment of dirty tricks in heavily funded efforts to deceive the American public.

As both a prosecutor and defense attorney, I have ... (show quote)

Having read your post several times I have formed the opinion that you are only saying what your opinion is on what you think the indictments are suggesting. I can only conclude you have made one factual statement, and that is, that you are an attorney. Based on your writings I totally believe you are an attorney.

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

permafrost wrote:

As both a prosecutor and defense attorney, I have written and reviewed many indictments. Though often brimming with legalese, they are designed by prosecutors to tell a compelling and detailed crime story. The indictment announced Friday in the Mueller investigation told just such a story -- of Russian attempts to sabotage the American presidential election.

If the allegations of the indictment prove true, it seems probable that the Russians were successful in their multimillion-dollar effort to influence the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States. Of course the answer to this complex question will never be definitively known. Polling cannot tell us whether voters might have chosen differently if the Russian influence operation hadn't happened.
What is known, however, is that the election was close and voter shifts in just a few significant states could have changed the Electoral College vote count in a presidential election in which Hillary Clinton won the popular vote.
The President, of course, has consistently been assuring the American public that the investigation led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller is all about a "hoax" and that it's a "witch hunt" largely supported by the forces of "Crooked Hillary Clinton" and the "fake news," which can roughly be defined as any news organization that offers any coverage that reflects badly on Donald Trump.
Trump and the GOP are making the Republican brand toxic for a generation
Trump and the GOP are making the Republican brand toxic for a generation
Mueller quietly and effectively disposed of those claims in his detailed explanation of how the Russian government literally sought to hack and hijack America's most important election by creating truly fake social media posts and protests designed to support the candidacy of Donald Trump (and in the primaries, Bernie Sanders) while sabotaging the candidacy of Hillary Clinton. The indictments revealed Russia's use of an assortment of dirty tricks in heavily funded efforts to deceive the American public.

As both a prosecutor and defense attorney, I have ... (show quote)

Hahahahaha that is one for Marvel Comic books Mr.Prosecutor.BTW the charge is meddling (WTF)a hundred million dollars worth of meddling,only the libs could come up with something like that.LOL

moldyoldy

Hemiman wrote:

Hahahahaha that is one for Marvel Comic books Mr.Prosecutor.BTW the charge is meddling (WTF)a hundred million dollars worth of meddling,only the libs could come up with something like that.LOL

He is just following the bread crumbs that lead right to the top.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

sisboombaa wrote:

Having read your post several times I have formed the opinion that you are only saying what your opinion is on what you think the indictments are suggesting. I can only conclude you have made one factual statement, and that is, that you are an attorney. Based on your writings I totally believe you are an attorney.

comon, sis..... You know it is a C & P....

We have much to do yet, but the proof is moving from circumstantial to smoking gun..

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Hemiman wrote:

Hahahahaha that is one for Marvel Comic books Mr.Prosecutor.BTW the charge is meddling (WTF)a hundred million dollars worth of meddling,only the libs could come up with something like that.LOL

You are confused or pretending..

they worked with a budget of over million per month... Think that came from anywhere other then Russian pocketbook???