One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Stop the removal of net neutrality
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Dec 18, 2017 08:11:36   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
ron vrooman wrote:
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The day after the Federal Communications Commission 3-2 vote to repeal the Obama-era “Net Neutrality” rules, Twitter is still allowing to be posted continues dozens of death threats attacking FCC Chair Ajit Pai, many containing racial smears and foul-language insults.

On Nov. 27, in his speech to the R Street Institute in Washington, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai attacked Twitter censorship by name, with a warning that reverberated throughout Silicon Valley.

“When it comes to a free and open Internet, Twitter is part of the problem,” Pai said, attacking the Internet edge company content provider for hiding behind net neutrality rules to implement an aggressive plan to censor conservatives and libertarians from the website.

Pai is a liar. I do not condone any threats.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The day after the Federal Commu... (show quote)
So you're saying that repealing Net Neutrality did not stop a problem that existed before the repeal.

Ok.. So?

Reply
Dec 18, 2017 08:16:28   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
JFlorio wrote:
Net Neutrality. Another great sounding disingenuous name. Washingtoneeze for more government interference.


You got it!!! What a joke it is !!

Reply
Dec 18, 2017 08:20:31   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
lindajoy wrote:
You got it!!! What a joke it is !!


Hey..

Let government be in charge of speech.

What could go wrong?

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2017 08:51:51   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Super Dave wrote:
Hey..

Let government be in charge of speech.

What could go wrong?


Everything!!!! Loll

I’m loven your Avi!!

Santa told me We elves have to watch this place ..

He’s a little concerned some will only have coal this year... lololollol😁😃😇

Reply
Dec 18, 2017 08:58:41   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
ron vrooman wrote:
This must be defeated. The FCC has recommended these changes. We must make Congress say no.


Why do you want Trump in charge of the internet?

I don't.

Reply
Dec 18, 2017 08:59:15   #
Lonewolf
 
So you want your internet provider to decide for you what you can see and read on the internet, I sure don't because that is what doing away with it does.
Of course PUTIN will be happy as trump strips away our freedon



JW wrote:
The concept behind net neutrality is identical to the government reasoning that gave us 100 years of black, dial telephones, rental only, from Ma Bell only... and no other choice.

Net neutrality needs to go!

Reply
Dec 18, 2017 09:00:06   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
lindajoy wrote:
Everything!!!! Loll

I’m loven your Avi!!

Santa told me We elves have to watch this place ..

He’s a little concerned some will only have coal this year... lololollol😁😃😇


It's a good thing Trump opened the coal mines. The demand this season will be great.

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2017 09:02:43   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Lonewolf wrote:
So you want your internet provider to decide for you what you can see and read on the internet, I sure don't because that is what doing away with it does.
Of course PUTIN will be happy as trump strips away our freedon
Who told you that putting government in charge of your communications services would increase your freedom?

Reply
Dec 18, 2017 10:05:40   #
Dragnet
 
ron vrooman wrote:
This must be defeated. The FCC has recommended these changes. We must make Congress say no.


Net Neutrality means Net Control. More government control means less, much less freedom.

Reply
Dec 18, 2017 10:17:32   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
then you do not know enough to continue the conversation.

JFlorio wrote:
A plant for corporate governance? How bout your nuts? All I know is Obama was for it so it’s not good for us.

Reply
Dec 18, 2017 10:25:20   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Fine with me. I know enough to know it means more government interference.
ron vrooman wrote:
then you do not know enough to continue the conversation.

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2017 10:55:30   #
Squiddiddler Loc: Phoenix
 
I've read all your comments, seems like you very Ill informed. Go read the fact's from an unbiased source.



ron vrooman wrote:
then you do not know enough to continue the conversation.

Reply
Dec 18, 2017 14:29:58   #
Airforceone
 
JFlorio wrote:
Net Neutrality. Another great sounding disingenuous name. Washingtoneeze for more government interference.


Great what pisses me off is you have no idea what it means. You Trump supporters the first time something is not available to you on the Internet. You will be the first to whine like children and blame democrats.

Reply
Dec 18, 2017 14:50:11   #
JW
 
Lonewolf wrote:
So you want your internet provider to decide for you what you can see and read on the internet, I sure don't because that is what doing away with it does.
Of course PUTIN will be happy as trump strips away our freedon


You really have no clue, do you... read this http://www.businessinsider.com/simple-explanation-of-net-neutrality-2014-4

The bottom line is you get what you pay for, nothing more. It has nothing to do with what you can access. It means competition will determine the marketplace. Eliminating competition was the reason no advancement in telephone technology happened for a hundred years. If one ISP refuses you access to a service, find a different provider who does.

Reply
Dec 18, 2017 15:09:32   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
See JW response. Try educating yourself. couldn't hurt.
Airforceone wrote:
Great what pisses me off is you have no idea what it means. You Trump supporters the first time something is not available to you on the Internet. You will be the first to whine like children and blame democrats.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.